Why is it that people who say Michael Jackson was GUILTY can never give you details of the Case?

[DatNkkaCutty]

Michael Jackson did not have child porn at his house...he professionally done and widely available and sold photographic books of nude boys...

Read the article you posted lmao...

 

[richaveli83]

Michael Jackson was a weird dude but he wasn't a pedophile.

 

[AlainLocke]

Bullshyt Theories again.

Do you believe Michael Jackson molested Evan Chandler and Gavin Arvizo? I'm not going to argue about why you think MJ owned a book.

The Truth About What Michael Jackson Had (And Didn't Have) In His Bedroom | HuffPost

From the 1993 case in MJ's bedroom...

Come on breh...

 

[Yo Mama]

Well I guess most people will never understand the desire to sleep in the same room/bed with kids that arent yours for fun. WHY?

A lot of peope have fked up or missed their childhoods altogether, but that isnt a good enough excuse, what were the parents thinking? The charges should have been against the parents.

Was Micheal ever accused of anything involving black kids?

 

[Benefited]

If u found out your neighbor let your sons sleep in his bed would you be pleading his innocence?would you draw your own conclusion and beat the shyt out lf em?

 

[Booker T Garvey]

Having had this debate so many times in my life, on and offline, I've noticed that when you bring forth undeniable evidence, the conversations ALWAYS stop.

I'll prove it to you here - nobody in here calling MJ a pedophile will address these two things, they'll pretend not to see them:

1)

2) MJ's FBI FILE >>>>> Michael Jackson

^^^^ i've been on Facebook, twitter, instagram, message boards...not one person has EVER come back after they see these two things.

what happens is something that has nothing to do with michael jackson; you show somebody irrefutable evidence that they've been duped, lied to
and they have to deal with the possibility that they may just be gullible and dumb after all.

it's too much...it's easier just to abandon the discussion altogether and pretend they didn't see it

MJ was wierd no doubt, very weird. but he never did anything sexual w/a child, there's also never been an accuser that didn't ask for money.

 

[Booker T Garvey]

From the 1993 case in MJ's bedroom...

Come on breh...

Michael Jackson was always a fan of books concerning children, he wasn't jacking off to them.

in fact he did a photo shoot with his photographer TODD GRAY, and when they were on the bus they were thumbing through a national geographic (i believe) and saw some kids abandoned through war

he told Todd Gray: "look at the sadness on their faces, we should do a photo shoot where I portray their sadness in my face"

AGAIN - very weird, odd or whatever, but that is where his mind would go - he felt a connection with those kids sadness, but he didn't think anything SEXUAL about children

Spoiler: some photos from that shoot

 

[AndroidHero]

I don't think his plastic surgery is an allegation.

 

[ISO]

From the 1993 case in MJ's bedroom...

Come on breh...

Didn’t it come out that this was false?

 

[Blankthawtz]

when I was a child Michael Jackson touched me......

























































with his tribute to James Brown.....

 

[xCivicx]

Because they're incapable of thinking for themselves and we live in a highly demonized/feminized culture in which "gossip" and "evidence" are intechangeable concepts

 

[5n0man]

There was a police report that said he had child porn

No he didnt, he had an art book that was autographed and given to him as a gift by the artist that featured children in a non sexual manner. I forgot the name of the book but I heard its available for purchase on Amazon.

The police even came out and denied allegations of them finding child porn in 2016

Authorities rebut claims child porn found at Michael Jackson’s Neverland Ranch

 

[AlainLocke]

Didn’t it come out that this was false?

No...it's an actual police report of what they found Michael's house in 1993

Here it is in full...dude liked all types of shyt...

http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/011805pltreqaseemd.pdf


All this stuff is public information...you can find out exactly what was in his house, testimonies from the boys he was friends with, and all types of shyt...

 

[You Win Perfect]

True. But I've seen MANY black folks do it too.

Ok and it’s still the I’m white and I say so narrative lol like wtf.
Black people love to come together to take down one of our own but it’s tumble weeds and crickets when it’s time to get a white supremacist

 

[Dynamite James]

From the 1993 case in MJ's bedroom...

Come on breh...

This comes from a prosecution motion from 2005 where Sneddon claimed that in 1993 they found a nude photo of a boy believed to be Jonathan Spence.
However they never actually showed this supposed photo, it was never introduced to the court. Why if this is the bombshell evidence you believe it to be? Actually when the prosecution eventually introduced evidence from 1993 they introduced two books but never even mentioned the supposed Spence photo again, let alone introducing it. So it's probably not really what the prosecution claimed. Let's not forget that the prosecution had a habit of claiming things in motions which did not turn out to be true in court. This alleged photo was never shown by them.


As for the books, it was two art books, one inscribed by a fan, the other inscribed by MJ. MJ was a collector of art books and it's not that he had an obsessive collection of books with nude boys. He had two such books in 93 in a collection of thousands of books - and they appeared to be a gift by a fan. If he had a sexual interest in such material he would have had a large collection of such material, but instead we are talking about two books in 93. Let's not forget they also searched his home in 2003 but haters are still forced to go on about those two art books from 93. Tells a lot about their best evidence..