You know Common Law marriage is legal in 17 states right?
So it literally can be "morally" possible in the eyes of the law as well. If women were just more honest and just straight up say, "I want financial security in a divorce settlement in case this shyt goes left" more Men would actually respect that and make better decisions with this dilemma. Don't know why it's so hard for women to admit that
This fluff in this post, and the absolute commitment for Women to gaslight Men on this issue is the perfect example of why Men should NOT be signing that contract
(Sigh)
As long as I've been on this site, I rarely post... I mostly sit back and observe... If I hit "reply" to make a post, it is because I'm genuinely curious about something that has been said, or either something has been said which I do not entirely understand...
I have no desire nor energy to gaslight anyone on here...for the intention of what is that needed?
All of that said though......
I'll contend with my original post, that I framed it all within the context of the woman being shamed because she didn't get married first before giving a man children.
Common law marriage has always been a thing, but since you brought it up (because, admittedly, I was not thinking about it when I made my post), I hardly ever hear that type of marriage lauded as the standard on TLR, nor is it held up to defend unwed ladies who give men children without a more recognized form of commitment (I.e. traditional marriage). That is the point I was trying to make.
It isn't hard to admit that most women want financial security in a divorce settlement in case the shyt goes left, so you'll get no argument or reluctance from me to "admit" that.