Why did technology take so long to advance?

Orbital-Fetus

cross that bridge
Supporter
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
40,544
Reputation
17,734
Daps
147,020
Reppin
Humanity
i think people had to get to a point where they could actually have the time to dedicate to something like technology. for a very long time in human history the vast majority of our time was spent doing things like growing food, hunting, dying young from an arrow to the knee, etc.

one of the major advancements that helped us leap forward was created by a man named Fritz Haber:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fritz_Haber

During his time at University of Karlsruhe from 1894 to 1911, Fritz Haber and Carl Bosch developed the Haber process, which is the catalytic formation of ammonia from hydrogen and atmospheric nitrogen under conditions of high temperature and pressure.[4]

In 1918 he received the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for this work.

The Haber-Bosch process was a milestone in industrial chemistry, because it divorced the production of nitrogen products, such as fertilizer, explosives and chemical feedstocks, from natural deposits, especially sodium nitrate (caliche), of which Chile was a major (and almost unique) producer. Naturally extracted nitrate production in Chile fell from 2.5 million tonnes (employing 60,000 workers and selling at $45/ton) in 1925 to just 800,000 tonnes, produced by 14,133 workers, and selling at $19/tonne in 1934. The annual world production of synthetic nitrogen fertilizer is currently more than 100 million tonnes. The food base of half of the current world population is based on the Haber-Bosch process.[6]

He was also active in the research of combustion reactions, the separation of gold from sea water, adsorption effects, electrochemistry, and free radical research (see Fenton's reagent). A large part of his work from 1911 to 1933 was done at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Physical Chemistry and Elektrochemistry at Berlin-Dahlem. In 1953, this institute was renamed for him. He is sometimes credited, incorrectly, with first synthesizing MDMA (which was first synthesized by Merck KGaA chemist Anton Köllisch in 1912)
long story short he invented a process that allowed the world to grow a lot more food so less people needed to farm...more people focusing on other things like Tech.

the science he used to make this breakthrough was based upon the discoveries of others before him and so on.

at this point technological advancement is going forward at an exponential rate and i don't think that we can absorb it as fast as it is created.
 

Olivia Pope

Banned
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
1,693
Reputation
0
Daps
1,021
Reppin
City of Peace of Mind
ΘГβĮŦ∆Ŀ ₣℮ŦЏگ;352262 said:
i think people had to get to a point where they could actually have the time to dedicate to something like technology. for a very long time in human history the vast majority of our time was spent doing things like growing food, hunting, dying young from an arrow to the knee, etc.

one of the major advancements that helped us leap forward was created by a man named Fritz Haber:
Fritz Haber - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


long story short he invented a process that allowed the world to grow a lot more food so less people needed to farm...more people focusing on other things like Tech.

the science he used to make this breakthrough was based upon the discoveries of others before him and so on.

at this point technological advancement is going forward at an exponential rate and i don't think that we can absorb it as fast as it is created.


But this doesn't really answer my question though...

Humans didn't have the tools to advance before 1918 centuries ago is what you're saying?
 

Orbital-Fetus

cross that bridge
Supporter
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
40,544
Reputation
17,734
Daps
147,020
Reppin
Humanity
But this doesn't really answer my question though...

Humans didn't have the tools to advance before 1918 centuries ago is what you're saying?

i'm trying to say that there are certain advancements that are game changers and allow things to happen that were inconceivable before.
the example i gave you was one of them.

if everyone had a real hard time growing enough food to feed themselves and then BAM....one day you need a fraction of the number of people to grow much more food, that would change everything,

almost immediately a huge part of the worlds population don't have to worry about spending most of their time farming. they are doing things like going to school.

less than 1% of the American population farms...and they make so much food that we not only feed America but we also export around the world.

if you went back in time 100 years and told someone that you come from a place where fewer that 1 out of 100 people grow food and it's enough to feed everyone and have a shyt load left over to sell or even give away they would think you where insane and continue to plow their land.

this is the kind of magic moment that allows the kind of great advancements we are witnessing today.
 

MR. SNIFLES

**** YOU THUNDAAAAAAAAAAH
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
20,489
Reputation
6,189
Daps
82,254
Reppin
THUNDER BUDDIES
WE'VE SEEN THAT OLDER CIVILIZATIONS DID HAVE SOME EARLY TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCES BUT BACK THEN WHOLE CITIES AND shyt WOULD JUST GET WIPED OUT AFTER WARS OR BY DISEASE. WE LOST SO MUCH KNOWLEDGE FROM WARS AND DISEASE.
 

Orbital-Fetus

cross that bridge
Supporter
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
40,544
Reputation
17,734
Daps
147,020
Reppin
Humanity
WE'VE SEEN THAT OLDER CIVILIZATIONS DID HAVE SOME EARLY TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCES BUT BACK THEN WHOLE CITIES AND shyt WOULD JUST GET WIPED OUT AFTER WARS OR BY DISEASE. WE LOST SO MUCH KNOWLEDGE FROM WARS AND DISEASE.

i agree.

i think what i'm trying to say is that major advancements are occurring more often is because there is more to build upon now. every major advancement allows for many others to be possible.

stone age was very limited.
iron age gave us cool, stronger tools.
agriculture allowed civilization to take root.
industrial revolution kicked down the door.
penicillin >>>> your life. i would be dead if antibiotics where not discovered.

i may not be presenting my answer in the best manner but i hope you get the idea.
 

acri1

The Chosen 1
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
23,986
Reputation
3,755
Daps
104,823
Reppin
Detroit
Fetus is right...

Prior to the last, let's say, couple hundred years, people had to spend most of their time just trying to survive. Not to mention that people had shorter lifespans. Most people didn't have much free time to ponder how the world worked or study science.

After the industrial revolution we got to a point where many people didn't have to be farmers, and had way more free time to think about other shyt, so technology started advancing faster.
 

Orbital-Fetus

cross that bridge
Supporter
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
40,544
Reputation
17,734
Daps
147,020
Reppin
Humanity
OP's question is a valid one and opens the door to many different paths that humanity has taken.

5 stars.
 

Serious

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
79,892
Reputation
14,198
Daps
190,197
Reppin
1st Round Playoff Exits
Fetus is right...

Prior to the last, let's say, couple hundred years, people had to spend most of their time just trying to survive. Not to mention that people had shorter lifespans. Most people didn't have much free time to ponder how the world worked or study science.

After the industrial revolution we got to a point where many people didn't have to be farmers, and had way more free time to think about other shyt, so technology started advancing faster.
This....

and Like I always say.

As technology advances, we become smarter in some ways but fattier, lazier and overall dumber.



ΘГβĮŦ∆Ŀ ₣℮ŦЏگ;354900 said:
allot of info in those vids.
i'll check it out later for sure.
It's a must see. I had to watch them simultaneously, because they were so good and hard to stop watching.....
 
Top