Olivia Pope
Banned
I ask this question because technology advanced within the past 70 years fairly quick if you ask me. But why didn't it advance centuries ago? And maybe if it did, technology will be 3 times advanced then it is now.
long story short he invented a process that allowed the world to grow a lot more food so less people needed to farm...more people focusing on other things like Tech.During his time at University of Karlsruhe from 1894 to 1911, Fritz Haber and Carl Bosch developed the Haber process, which is the catalytic formation of ammonia from hydrogen and atmospheric nitrogen under conditions of high temperature and pressure.[4]
In 1918 he received the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for this work.
The Haber-Bosch process was a milestone in industrial chemistry, because it divorced the production of nitrogen products, such as fertilizer, explosives and chemical feedstocks, from natural deposits, especially sodium nitrate (caliche), of which Chile was a major (and almost unique) producer. Naturally extracted nitrate production in Chile fell from 2.5 million tonnes (employing 60,000 workers and selling at $45/ton) in 1925 to just 800,000 tonnes, produced by 14,133 workers, and selling at $19/tonne in 1934. The annual world production of synthetic nitrogen fertilizer is currently more than 100 million tonnes. The food base of half of the current world population is based on the Haber-Bosch process.[6]
He was also active in the research of combustion reactions, the separation of gold from sea water, adsorption effects, electrochemistry, and free radical research (see Fenton's reagent). A large part of his work from 1911 to 1933 was done at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Physical Chemistry and Elektrochemistry at Berlin-Dahlem. In 1953, this institute was renamed for him. He is sometimes credited, incorrectly, with first synthesizing MDMA (which was first synthesized by Merck KGaA chemist Anton Köllisch in 1912)
ΘГβĮŦ∆Ŀ ₣℮ŦЏگ;352262 said:i think people had to get to a point where they could actually have the time to dedicate to something like technology. for a very long time in human history the vast majority of our time was spent doing things like growing food, hunting, dying young from an arrow to the knee, etc.
one of the major advancements that helped us leap forward was created by a man named Fritz Haber:
Fritz Haber - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
long story short he invented a process that allowed the world to grow a lot more food so less people needed to farm...more people focusing on other things like Tech.
the science he used to make this breakthrough was based upon the discoveries of others before him and so on.
at this point technological advancement is going forward at an exponential rate and i don't think that we can absorb it as fast as it is created.
But this doesn't really answer my question though...
Humans didn't have the tools to advance before 1918 centuries ago is what you're saying?
WE'VE SEEN THAT OLDER CIVILIZATIONS DID HAVE SOME EARLY TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCES BUT BACK THEN WHOLE CITIES AND shyt WOULD JUST GET WIPED OUT AFTER WARS OR BY DISEASE. WE LOST SO MUCH KNOWLEDGE FROM WARS AND DISEASE.
It's exponential growth.. at first it begins slow, but gets faster and faster and faster and faster (because we have previous knowledge we just improve upon) now we have Singularity on the horizon.
This....Fetus is right...
Prior to the last, let's say, couple hundred years, people had to spend most of their time just trying to survive. Not to mention that people had shorter lifespans. Most people didn't have much free time to ponder how the world worked or study science.
After the industrial revolution we got to a point where many people didn't have to be farmers, and had way more free time to think about other shyt, so technology started advancing faster.
It's a must see. I had to watch them simultaneously, because they were so good and hard to stop watching.....ΘГβĮŦ∆Ŀ ₣℮ŦЏگ;354900 said:allot of info in those vids.
i'll check it out later for sure.