White guys were edited out of the recent street harassment video

mr.africa

Veteran
Joined
Aug 17, 2013
Messages
19,837
Reputation
3,925
Daps
68,256


tariqelite
47 minutes ago
White supremacy and Photoshop Strikes again! Last week the governor of Pennsylvania was exposed of photoshopping Black people in his campaign ads to appear to be more racially inclusive. Now the http://www.ihollaback.org organization-the group behind the controversial "Street Harassment" campaign,are being accused of being racially bias and anti-Black male. In an effort to appear racially inclusive,and to give the impression that some Black males are cosigning their Street harassment campaign,I Holla Back has a photoshopped picture of a Black man modeling their t-shirt on the official IHollaBack website. If you look at the illustration below,you can see they put the head of a Black man on the body of a white person,then darkened the skin.The photo on the bottom right is the original picture of the Black male model.. Nice try Holla Back... www.hiddencolorsfilm.com (be sure to share this)


rCWpf1a.gif

WOW!!!
 

godkiller

"We are the Fury"
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
26,151
Reputation
-4,700
Daps
35,650
Reppin
NULL
"He added: "We got a fair amount of white guys, but for whatever reason, a lot of what they said was in passing, or off camera. So their scenes were a lot shorter, but the numbers themselves are relatively even."

The person that created the video is a cac himself so it's no wonder only black men (and Latinos) are given a "special line" of distinguishment which cacs coincidentally don't meet for miscallenous and ridiculous reasons. Were there no "distractions" when the non-black man dudes courted? Also, one would expect cacs making "passerby" comments--which are unsolicited and vulgar--counts as street harassment. Except maybe cacs are garbage at it so the interaction ends as quickly as it starts. This isn't a reason to remove the cacs, but to spotlight them. This reason assumes the person behind the camera isn't a goddamn cac himself that rationalizes everything cacs do to make them see superior and demonize blacks.
 
Last edited:

mrken12

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Messages
80,804
Reputation
20,860
Daps
300,329
Reppin
Maryland
The guy himself said he edited the footage out and made very vague and nonsensical excuses as to why....

SO it isn't a fair and balanced picture. He already admitted this in a reddit AMA.

Just report his posts. He's been on this white supremacist bullshyt from day one. Don't even waste your time with his circular arguments.
 

godkiller

"We are the Fury"
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
26,151
Reputation
-4,700
Daps
35,650
Reppin
NULL
no he wasn't lol :comeon:

racism or not

the concept of street harassment still exists

I hate that this video happened

for couple of reasons one being the obvious racism

two....because now black men are gonna use this as a reason to dismiss black womens issues. great, just great. :snoop:

The concept of street harassment is subjective and mired in racial stereotype. When a cac hits on a woman, their actions apparently doesn't reach the level of street harassment. When black men hit on a woman, our actions do. Inasmuch as feminism continues to be just another vehicle for cac's violence against minority men, then street harassment is just another propaganda tool of the enemy. And all those who purposely follow that propaganda, knowing full well the anti-black implications, are no different to the white supremacists.

Asking people to not follow you for 10 blocks while you walk home is a subsidiary of racism? Nah....

Showcasing only black men doing said stalking is racism tho'.

It doesn't have to be either/or.

So long as feminists allow themselves to be used by cacs--either intentionally or advertently-- to push the latter's own white supremacist male ideas--to neuter non-black men, prostrate their own white selves as superior, and then use the nubious shade of feminism as cover--then feminism is no different to racism. And as the two ideals cannot be decoupled in action, so they deserve the same label: anti-black, racist, white supremacist. And insofar as this is true, no white supremacist should receive any black support, irregardless of anything else attached. If feminsm is attached to white supremacy, then both must perish.
 
Last edited:

mrken12

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Messages
80,804
Reputation
20,860
Daps
300,329
Reppin
Maryland
Dude could have easily put an end to this by showing these deleted scenes or making an extended cut with no editing.

Doubt we'll ever see them though.

He won't and he never will. He'd rather take this backlash than depict white men in a negative light. So it's considered a greater priority to him to protect the image of white men than to show a complete picture of the so called "harassment" women deal with. He clearly doesn't give a fukk about women, feminism, or any of their problems. It's all about his agenda.
 

christinasade

Banned
Joined
Jul 13, 2013
Messages
2,059
Reputation
-1,360
Daps
2,433
Reppin
NULL
The concept of street harassment is subjective and mired in racial stereotype. When a cac hits on a woman, their actions apparently doesn't reach the level of street harassment. When black men hit on a woman, our actions do. Inasmuch as feminism continues to be just another means for cacs to prostrate themselves as superior--the better man--than non-black men, then street harassment is our enemy. And those whom

Yup, the issue is going to be dismssed, as it is now just a front for cacs to prostrate themselves as more civilized and superior than blacks. Like we said over and over again, while


So long as feminists allow themselves to be used by cacs--either intentionally or advertently-- to push the latter's own white supremacist male ideas--to neuter non-black men, prostrate their own white selves as superior, and then use the nubious shade of feminism as cover--then feminism is no different to racism. And as the two ideals cannot be decoupled in action, so they deserve the same label: anti-black, racist, white supremacist. And insofar as this is true, no white supremacist should receive any black support, irregardless of anything else attached. If feminsm is attached to white supremacy, then both must perish.


dismissing black womens issues is okay with you?

thats cool but i know one thing, you guys had better clean up your act as black women are starting to pick up a gun

because if we cant talk to yall....


then i guess yall will have learn the hard way.
 

christinasade

Banned
Joined
Jul 13, 2013
Messages
2,059
Reputation
-1,360
Daps
2,433
Reppin
NULL
Everyone knows that black and Latino men are more aggressive with women than white and Asian men. So when the makers of that video say that there was footage of white men harassing that girl that they couldn't use I think they are lying. They are probably just saying that in order to be politically correct and make it seem like all men are equally aggressive when everyone knows they aren't.

Feminist groups are very liberal and being accused of racism is one of the worst things you can do to them. There is no way in hell they would consciously choose to edit out videos of white men cat calling a woman. What would even be the point in editing out white men?


yes they are more aggressive

thats not the issue, the issue is more to the fact that black and latino dudes dont know how to take rejection well.

and when you reject them......thats when the problem occures. and then as a woman especially black women we feel scared to death.

so no, to tell you the truth i dont think white men said anything to her, why? because look at her.....shes a slightly chunky dark haired white woman--thats not white mens type....thats

not what they like. however black and latino eat that shyt up like skittles as we see in the video. personally.....they should do it again this time using a black woman in a black

neighborhood so black dudes could understand from a visually standpoint what we go through. but thats too much like right though.
 
Top