Which is easier: Turning $100 into a milli, or turning a million into a billion?

which is easier

  • $100 ->$1 million

    Votes: 8 26.7%
  • $1 milion -> $1 billion

    Votes: 22 73.3%

  • Total voters
    30

marcuz

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
55,000
Reputation
12,806
Daps
157,153
I voted for 100 into a million. We have thousands of pro athletes that became millionaires but only Tiger Woods and Michael Jordan were able to generate a billion dollars. You have Fanduel, Draftkings,casino sportsbooks, lottery scratch offs and regular lottery tickets that can all turn your Benjamin Franklin into a million dollars. Going from millionaire to billionaire sounds harder.
it probably is easier to turn 100 into a million, but your example aint it. this thread is about investing money and it turning into something more. not being a sports athlete (which still cost well over 100 bucks)
 

Ohene

Free Sheist
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
71,482
Reputation
5,955
Daps
122,077
Reppin
Toronto
The math of this question is dumb. 1million is 10000 hundreds
1 billion is 1000 millions


The latter is the answer based on that alone...but even if even the layer still the answer
 

Ohene

Free Sheist
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
71,482
Reputation
5,955
Daps
122,077
Reppin
Toronto
100 into million i think is easier. my reasoning is that

1. if you have the same knowledge in both situations, the types of hustles people will come up with to seperate you from your money will be more "common" and known to you if you have the million. billion dollar congame will be more sophisticated.

2. On the stock market, generally when you're smaller, you have more room and opportunity to grow. more options to double up. the bigger you get the less investing options you have that will be worth it.
You're such a good poster. I can't believe you posted the nonsense in #2 lol

Trading fees alone would kill your 100 dollars and you won't be able to diversify. You'll lose that money in a second unless you luck up and buy stock options in a biopharmaceutical company that gets acquired forna 50% premium or some shyt. That in itself is a lottery.

shyt....there are stocks out there that have one share equal to more than 100
 

Turbulent

Superstar
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
17,927
Reputation
4,184
Daps
54,958
Reppin
NULL
You're such a good poster. I can't believe you posted the nonsense in #2 lol

Trading fees alone would kill your 100 dollars and you won't be able to diversify. You'll lose that money in a second unless you luck up and buy stock options in a biopharmaceutical company that gets acquired forna 50% premium or some shyt. That in itself is a lottery.

shyt....there are stocks out there that have one share equal to more than 100
didn't think of that :ehh:
 

MJ Truth

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Feb 1, 2015
Messages
37,956
Reputation
3,393
Daps
151,002
I think the first mil would be easier. There are tons of millionaires walking around but not too many people are billionaires. If turning a million into a billion was easier then it would stand to reason that there would be a lot more than there are now.
The first million is more likely, the first billion is easiest.....

But that's an opinion from a cat who has neither. :whoa:
 
Top