Where The Word God Comes From - The Real Origins of Religion Stolen From Egyptians

[KOohbt]

what do you get out of getting so worked up about it?

besides, I was reading bout this stuff since like the mid 90's, fukk outta here.

put me on ignore and keep it moving.

Just like I thought.

 

[GSR]

Like I posted earlier, there's the second largest desert in the world blocking them from traversing from east to west and I never stated they didn't travel.

Comparing modern-day societal travels to those 5,000+ years ago is why you're having difficulties.​

This is patently false. The Saharan desert was like 10% the size back then as it is today. Much of that region was a plush wet forest back then including the center of KMT as the Sphinx has been shown to have water erosion marks on it potentially dating it back to 10,000bc. Ancient (dynastic) Egypt is much older than most people think, and even before them ancient Nubia was a powerhouse.

Now I know you don't know what your talking. You're just rehashing stuff written in a few books.

On another note I do agree that ancient Egypt is far from the only thing that makes black people/history great. There were countless other advanced civilization all over the continent.....sheeeeiiit not even 3 years ago they discovered ancient mounds that literally stretch all over the continent easy to west north to south dated to be at least 100,000 years old. Africans were transcending the entire continent before KMT was even thought of. There were ancient advanced civilizations that literally left no evidence behind whatsoever but we know about thru other means....

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

This is patently false. The Saharan desert was like 10% the size back then as it is today.

Yeah, back after the last Ice Age. Approximately 10,000 BCE. By 5,000 BCE, the Sahara completely dominated North Africa. Egypt's Old Kingdom civilization didn't begin until 3,000 BCE with the unification of Upper and Lower Egypt.
​

Now I know you don't know what your talking. You're just rehashing stuff written in a few books.

Yep, this one in particular......

.....while those opposing me are using the work of Godfrey Higgins and Gerald Massey, or, those using their work as a starting point.​

On another note I do agree that ancient Egypt is far from the only thing that makes black people/history great. There were countless other advanced civilization all over the continent.....sheeeeiiit not even 3 years ago they discovered ancient mounds that literally stretch all over the continent easy to west north to south dated to be at least 100,000 years old. Africans were transcending the entire continent before KMT was even thought of. There were ancient advanced civilizations that literally left no evidence behind whatsoever but we know about thru other means....

Humanity started in Africa so it is only common-sense that they traversed most the continent prior to leaving. This is the theory created by Cheikh Anta Diop and supported by mountains of evidence. The only people suggesting otherwise are motivated by racism.
​

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

The Sahara wasn't as dry back then. It was a lot more fertile and green.

You're referring to after the last Ice Age (~10,000 BCE), but, as I stated earlier, the Sahara dominated North Africa by 5,000 BCE........about 2,000 years before Egyptian civilization began.
​

 

[GSR]

Yeah, back after the last Ice Age. Approximately 10,000 BCE. By 5,000 BCE, the Sahara completely dominated North Africa. Egypt's Old Kingdom civilization didn't begin until 3,000 BCE with the unification of Upper and Lower Egypt.
​

Yep, this one in particular......

.....while those opposing me are using the work of Godfrey Higgins and Gerald Massey, or, those using their work as a starting point.​

Humanity started in Africa so it is only common-sense that they traversed most the continent prior to leaving. This is the theory created by Cheikh Anta Diop and supported by mountains of evidence. The only people suggesting otherwise are motivated by racism.
​

I'll have to check that book out but considering it's from Cambridge (UK) don't know how much trust I can put in it.

And there's no proof that KMT only started in 3000bc. Pre dynastic lower KMT could have been much older, anywhere from 4500bc to 10,000 bc

And I always give a side eye to anyone who speaks on this shyt as if they know or what they're saying is indisputable. Fact is modern archeologists don't know for a fact. All we have is evidence which also requires proper interpretation of the evidence and the vast majority of archeologists have shytty interpretation.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

I'll have to check that book out but considering it's from Cambridge (UK) don't know how much trust I can put in it.

That's a good starting point, but check their references and footnotes.​

And there's no proof that KMT only started in 3000bc. Pre dynastic lower KMT could have been much older, anywhere from 4500bc to 10,000 bc

Actually, they base their findings on stone tools and other traces of permanent settlement, like land cultivation, garbage dumps (middens), and pottery. Prior to that, they were migratory hunter/gatherers.​

And I always give a side eye to anyone who speaks on this shyt as if they know or what they're saying is indisputable. Fact is modern archeologists don't know for a fact. All we have is evidence which also requires proper interpretation of the evidence and the vast majority of archeologists have shytty interpretation.

Never stated it was indisputable. I stated there is no evidence to the contrary. As far as reconstructing history, all we can do is look for evidence to support/reject hypotheses.​

 

[KingMalik]

Facts. People dikkride Egypt because white people dikkride Egypt. People ignore other African societies because white people ignore them.

"the man got game like a motherfukka" Ras Kass

So, what white people dikk ride Egypt out of genuine interest and curiosity? No. They dikkride it because they've tried to prove unsuccessfully for centuries that an African country didnt rule the world at one point. Black people just correcting all the lies and misinformation they put out here. Your reverse psychology isn't going to work.

 

[Oceanicpuppy]

You're referring to after the last Ice Age (~10,000 BCE), but, as I stated earlier, the Sahara dominated North Africa by 5,000 BCE........about 2,000 years before Egyptian civilization began.
​

When the Sahara Turned to Sand
BY KIM MARTINEAU|NOVEMBER 8, 2013

The Sahara wasn’t always a desert. Trees and grasslands dominated the landscape from roughly 10,000 years ago to 5,000 years ago. Then, abruptly, the climate changed, and north Africa began to dry out.

Previous research has suggested that the end of the African Humid Period came gradually, over thousands of years, but a study published last month in Science says it took just a few hundred. The shift was initially triggered by more sunlight falling on Earth’s northern hemisphere, as Earth’s cyclic orientation toward the sun changed. But how that orbital change caused North Africa to dry out so fast–in 100 to 200 years, says the study–is a matter of debate.

Two feedback mechanisms have been proposed. In the first, as the climate gets warmer and drier, trees give way to sparser vegetation, making the now barren region warmer and drier, causing more vegetation to wither. The explanation favored by the authors–climate scientists Jessica Tierney, at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, and Peter deMenocal, at Columbia University’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory–is that shifting sea-surface temperatures in the Indian Ocean reduced rainfall over east Africa.

In analyzing the above sediment core, deMenocal and Tierney found that north Africa’s climate about 5,000 years ago dried out in as little as 100 to 200 years.

The study puts the dawn of the Egyptian state, at about 5,000 years ago, into context and suggests that feedback mechanisms could cause similar rainfall switches in north Africa and other regions as humans continue to heat the planet. “It’s evidence that climate doesn’t respond gradually to gradual forcing,” deMenocal told The Atlantic.

The study is also one of the few climate reconstructions to have come out of the region recently. One of the crucial sediment cores was recovered in 2001 aboard a Dutch research ship in the Gulf of Aden a couple of months before the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, just before a major surge of terrorism, political unrest and piracy largely placed the Horn of Africa off-limits to scientists.

Even then, pirates were already a danger, deMenocal explains in the video above. Lamont’s own research ship, the Maurice Ewing, had been attacked with rocket-propelled grenades a few months before. To avoid detection, the captain shut off the ship’s radar, radio and navigation lights as they sailed along the coasts of Somalia and Yemen. By fax, the ship received updates of known pirate attacks, some near sites they had planned to core. But they got their core and eventually docked safely in Egypt.









And even then humans today still cross the current dry Sahara so either way Africans where spreading around the continent. There are various tribes that cross the Sahara.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

And even then humans today still cross the current dry Sahara so either way Africans where spreading around the continent. There are various tribes that cross the Sahara.

Article doesn't refute anything I stated and no one is disputing that there were people traveling the continent, but they weren't Egyptians, they were Mandé people from Central Africa and Berbers.

The people who built the pyramids stayed in Northeast Africa and didn't head west due to the Sahara.​

 

[Oceanicpuppy]

Article doesn't refute anything I stated and no one is disputing that there were people traveling the continent, but they weren't Egyptians, they were Mandé people from Central Africa and Berbers.

The people who built the pyramids stayed in Northeast Africa and didn't head west due to the Sahara.​

Some mande's speaking tribes claim to have originated from Egypt. Specifically the Dogon. The article states that at the dawn of Egyptian civilization the Sahara started to dry. Egyptian Civilization was an extension of Nubia which predates Egypt. So them crossing west within that span of time is not farfetched. They have also recently also found pyramid mounds in Niger.
Also Ancient Libya was just NorthWest and there were a number of Libyan Pharaohs and a period of Libyan Rule in Egypt. So to say they didn't go west is not accurate.

 

[bouncy]

I just found this article about an ancient Egyptian city that was found underwater. This helps prove my point that the people could have traveled the coastline to get to west Africa. @Dafunkdoc_Unlimited keeps writing there is no proof, so he just brushes it off, but like I wrote earlier, why do that if you know new information is always developing?

Again, use your brain, come up with theories, and see if they can be proven. Just wait, and time will reveal the truth. I'm even more convinced they traveled the coastline. Why would a whole city be built, but they won't continue follow the coastline to see where it leads? This city is more recent, so imagine what older stuff may be out there, if they search further down the coastline.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...y-lost-1-200-years-begins-reveal-secrets.html

Sunken city gives up its treasure: Ancient Egyptian metropolis lost for 1,200 years below Mediterranean sea set to go on display

• Heracleion was submerged by the sea and sands 1,200 years ago
• Was discovered during a survey at the beginning of the last decade
• Archaeologists are now preparing to show some of the objects found

colossal statue of an ancient unknown Pharaoh (left) lies on a barge in an Alexandrian naval base after it was uncovered in the ancient submerged city of Heracleion. French marine archaeologist Frank Goddio (right) explains text on the stele of Heracleion

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Some mande's speaking tribes claim to have originated from Egypt. Specifically the Dogon.

Those accounts are unreliable (like the claim they knew Sirius was a dual-star) and are more recent than the height of Egyptian civilization.
​

The article states that at the dawn of Egyptian civilization the Sahara started to dry. Egyptian Civilization was an extension of Nubia which predates Egypt. So them crossing west within that span of time is not farfetched. They have also recently also found pyramid mounds in Niger.

All of which is East Africa and them crossing the Sahara is farfetched since the Old Kingdom didn't start till about 3,100 BCE.........2,000 years after the Sahara dried up. The construction of pyramids isn't due to Egyptian influence, it's just a matter of convention and practicality. Pyramids are the most stable structures of any significant height.
​

Also Ancient Libya was just NorthWest and there were a number of Libyan Pharaohs and a period of Libyan Rule in Egypt. So to say they didn't go west is not accurate.

Libyan Pharaohs didn't come into power until the 9th Century BCE........2,000 years after Pre-dynastic Egypt. Libyans are descendants of Berbers and Phoenicians, not Egyptians.

Egyptians didn't go west until Alexander the Great and Ptolemy came to power in the 3rd/4th Century BCE.​

 

[bouncy]

Those accounts are unreliable and are more recent than the height of Egyptian civilization.
​

All of which is East Africa and them crossing the Sahara is farfetched since the Old Kingdom didn't start till about 3,100 BCE.........2,000 years after the Sahara dried up. The construction of pyramids isn't due to Egyptian influence, it's just a matter of convention and practicality. Pyramids are the most stable structures of any significant height.
​

Libyan Pharaohs didn't come into power until the 9th Century BCE........2,000 years after Pre-dynastic Egypt. Libyans are descendants of Berbers and Phoenicians, not Egyptians.

Egyptians didn't go west until Alexander the Great and Ptolemy came to power in the 3rd/4th Century BCE.​

You assume they didn't go west based off of what you have previously learned. You can't say this as fact, and this is my problem with you, you act like these are concrete facts, when they aren't.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

I just found this article about an ancient Egyptian city that was found underwater. This helps prove my point that the people could have traveled the coastline to get to west Africa

It doesn't prove your point since it is north of Lower Egypt.​

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

You assume they didn't go west based off of what you have previously learned. You can't say this as fact, and this is my problem with you, you act like these are concrete facts, when they aren't.

I never stated they were 'facts'. Your problem is reading too much into what I post.​