here's a fun fact... Steph Curry has 29 dunks in his 15-year career of over 950 games. Griner has 26 dunks in her 11 year NBA career of over 300 games. And most people say Steph is one of the most exciting players in the NBA. Care to make sense of that for me?
Male muscle is four times stronger than female muscle.
So steph relative to his professional nba standing. Plus his game.
Has dunked about what is normal.
While grinder playing center on a regulation male goal.
Has not dunked nearly as much being a big. That would make relative sense. If griner was a male big at seven foot plus.
Which is the problem. With women playing basketball on a male regulation goal. It is not women's basketball. It is women playing on a male regulation goal.
Women need to be able to play women's basketball. Not women playing on a male regulation height goal.
It is asinine.
Plus the game will never really draw worth a damn. As it has nuffin to draw in a gateway general consumer.
As the visual of watching the women play on a male regulation height goal. Has no way to really create a profit. In general to the common consumer.
watching the wnba.
is the same low drawing visual. Of watching bitty ball on a adult male regulation goal.
nobody in general will watch it. As it offers no payoff to a general consumer. Plus for a woman watching. It does not produce any rise in the genrral female consumer. As the game creatws no gateway reward to play. Whereas as a male. At any age. That male player is playing in and based on the hope. That they will one day throw it down. Even if they never grow. While women playing on a male regulation goal. Have no general endgame to play.
Plus no general basic reward as a propective player.
playing on a male regulation height goal.
Art Barr
. 
