What tv should I get for PS5 and Series X ?

O.T.I.S.

Veteran
Joined
Sep 15, 2013
Messages
74,365
Reputation
15,729
Daps
286,099
Reppin
The Truth
CX. Nanocells have a bad rep for screen uniformity issues and not good picture quality even by LCD standards.

On the other hand you don't have to worry about burn-in and unlike most LCDs (Samsung excluded) come with HDMI 2.1 as standard.

Edit

It also depends whether the television will be in a very bright environment. OLED does well in a dark environment while Nanocell does well in bright rooms.
I hear the LG Nanocell 90 actually has 2.1... which was one of the main reasons I went with the OLED
 

O.T.I.S.

Veteran
Joined
Sep 15, 2013
Messages
74,365
Reputation
15,729
Daps
286,099
Reppin
The Truth
That's what I meant. The only LCD TVs with 2.1 are Samsung and LG. Sony only has one model with it and technically it hasn't because 2.1 will only be activated via an update.
So Nanocell or CX :lupe:

I mean, I already bought the CX but could return it for a bigger TV that utilizes 2.1 and a better value as well.

Do you know which one has the better input lag?
 

O³ (O cubed)

No more PAWGs, PLEASE??!!!??
Joined
Mar 8, 2017
Messages
17,502
Reputation
3,940
Daps
64,405
Reppin
Hackney, London
So Nanocell or CX :lupe:

I mean, I already bought the CX but could return it for a bigger TV that utilizes 2.1 and a better value as well.

Do you know which one has the better input lag?
According to rtings.com, input lag for the CX is 13.6 ms. It's 14.7ms for the Nanocell.

Tbh the CX is the better TV.
 
Top