Negro Caesar
Superstar
500 max
4K/60 hz Monitor
https://www.bestbuy.com/site/lg-ult...SJdNyWJQ2JnWV8uEnpxoCBKoQAvD_BwE&gclsrc=aw.ds
1440hz/144hz
500 max
looking forward to spiderman . also something that can play 4k movieswhat type of games you play most
Yeah that LG monitor is a nice monitor.looking forward to spiderman . also something that can play 4k movies
I hear the LG Nanocell 90 actually has 2.1... which was one of the main reasons I went with the OLEDCX. Nanocells have a bad rep for screen uniformity issues and not good picture quality even by LCD standards.
On the other hand you don't have to worry about burn-in and unlike most LCDs (Samsung excluded) come with HDMI 2.1 as standard.
Edit
It also depends whether the television will be in a very bright environment. OLED does well in a dark environment while Nanocell does well in bright rooms.
That's what I meant. The only LCD TVs with 2.1 are Samsung and LG. Sony only has one model with it and technically it hasn't because 2.1 will only be activated via an update.I hear the LG Nanocell 90 actually has 2.1... which was one of the main reasons I went with the OLED
So Nanocell or CXThat's what I meant. The only LCD TVs with 2.1 are Samsung and LG. Sony only has one model with it and technically it hasn't because 2.1 will only be activated via an update.
Join OLED GangSo Nanocell or CX
I mean, I already bought the CX but could return it for a bigger TV that utilizes 2.1 and a better value as well.
Do you know which one has the better input lag?
According to rtings.com, input lag for the CX is 13.6 ms. It's 14.7ms for the Nanocell.So Nanocell or CX
I mean, I already bought the CX but could return it for a bigger TV that utilizes 2.1 and a better value as well.
Do you know which one has the better input lag?
I thought CX said 1msAccording to rtings.com, input lag for the CX is 13.6 ms. It's 14.7ms for the Nanocell.
Tbh the CX is the better TV.