What media are you guys watching that promotes homosexuality?

[ExodusNirvana]

it always comes down to money. If it wasn't interesting and popular then it wouldn't make money. Just like the life and times of fake and real thugs.

However, There are lgb organizations and groups involved in the production and push for the presence of positive lgb stereotypes and images.

I don't think the majority of black people are happy to see ignorant videos or killing young black youth music out there. As a matter of fact, the majority of the money that comes from those sells isn't coming from us or supporters of our community.

Why is the bolded an issue? Would you prefer negative or none at all? Both of which would be unfair?

 

[Kaydigi]

Modern Family especially season 2 and 3. They were going out of there way to push it, every episode to had to mention there sexual preference.

 

[Gallo]

I dont watch television, listen to the radio but I do watch gay films so i didnt become a zombie like a lot of my friends here. Lets avoid being brainwashed by the media yall.

 

[WhiteDawg3000]

Patrice Oneal had an interesting rant on the "gay cartel" Starting 3 minute mark

Opie And Anthony - Patrice O'Neal on Gays, Money, Life And Success - YouTube

 

[alybaba]

Yall are forgetting that gay characters appeal to women.

 

[The Real]

The idea that there is an agenda to "promote" homosexuality is nonsense, of course, but what there is, and what these anti-homo types are partially responding to is the sudden viability of homosexuals as a marketing niche. It's not that there's some conspiracy to get gay people into the media - those activists concerned with media representation are only a small factor. What's really happening is that businesspeople are realizing that there is a contingent of gay people with money- mostly gay white men, surprise, surprise, and pandering to them by adding a gay element to tv shows, etc. There's been no massive increase in Black lesbians or gay, working class immigrants on tv. This is also why the stereotype most anti-homo types and others have in their heads of a homosexual individual is of a white, gay man with some money, despite most homosexuals actually suffering economic discrimination.

This is just capitalism doing what it's always done.

 

[thekingsmen]

The idea that there is an agenda to "promote" homosexuality is nonsense, of course, but what there is, and what these anti-homo types are partially responding to is the sudden viability of homosexuals as a marketing niche. It's not that there's some conspiracy to get gay people into the media - those activists concerned with media representation are only a small factor. What's really happening is that businesspeople are realizing that there is a contingent of gay people with money- mostly gay white men, surprise, surprise, and pandering to them by adding a gay element to tv shows, etc. There's been no massive increase in Black lesbians or gay, working class immigrants on tv. This is also why the stereotype most anti-homo types and others have in their heads of a homosexual individual is of a white, gay man with some money, despite most homosexuals actually suffering economic discrimination.

This is just capitalism doing what it's always done.

You denying an agenda or calling it non-sense proves you are out of touch with reality. There are always agenda out there wither you agree with them or not that promote White Supremacy....more ways than one.

 

[Julius Skrrvin]

I don't think it's an agenda, just that a disproportionately large percentage of the population that works in arts and entertainment is homosexual or of another alternative sexual preference. That seems to have always been the case. I suppose its just that they're allowed to be more open about it now, so it translates into the media at higher proportions.

 

[MeachTheMonster]

I don't think it's an agenda, just that a disproportionately large percentage of the population that works in arts and entertainment is homosexual or of another alternative sexual preference. That seems to have always been the case. I suppose its just that they're allowed to be more open about it now, so it translates into the media at higher proportions.

Wouldn't it be fair to say that they have an agenda?

If the industry has a disproportionately large gay presence, wouldn't it be feasable to say they have an agenda, if not for anything but to continue their dominance in the industry?

 

[Mr. Somebody]

You denying an agenda or calling it non-sense proves you are out of touch with reality. There are always agenda out there wither you agree with them or not that promote White Supremacy....more ways than one.

Hes definately out of touch. Queens that are in positions of power in media outlets generate content to push their agendas of the world accepting sweetness but im sorry we just dont. Hes lost his mind friend.

 

[The Real]

You denying an agenda or calling it non-sense proves you are out of touch with reality. There are always agenda out there wither you agree with them or not that promote White Supremacy....more ways than one.

There isn't an agenda. This is how capitalism works. This is the same reason capitalism destroyed the previous, feudal social order. It doesn't obey rules of the previous social order if there is profit to be made (with a few exceptions, of course- Capitalism would not have ended and still won't end racism, for example.)

 

[Mr. Somebody]

There isn't an agenda. This is how capitalism works. This is the same reason capitalism destroyed the previous, feudal social order. It doesn't obey rules of the previous social order if there is profit to be made (with a few exceptions, of course- Capitalism would not have ended and still won't end racism, for example.)

Last December, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton delivered a landmark speech at the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva, proclaiming that "gay rights are human rights" and announcing the U.S.'s first government-wide policy to push for the decriminalization of homosexuality overseas (the speech coincided with a memorandum issued by President Obama). She vowed "to ensure that our foreign assistance promotes the protection of LGBT rights" but was light on specifics. Within days, newspapers in Liberia -- one of America's closest allies in the region -- were condemning the policy in particular and homosexuality in general. Sub-Saharan Africa is marked by widespread homophobia as well as chronic dependence on foreign aid, in particular from the U.S., and the idea that those two issues might now be linked seemed to upset a lot of people here. (dont feel like sourcing. google it)

Looks like an agenda to me, but im sure you have a spin as to why there is no agenda coming right up. Its so demonic, friend.

 

[Mr. Somebody]

Part of the backlash in some countries has to do with misinterpretation: a number of African media outlets have consistently reported that the policy makes U.S. foreign aid conditional on gay rights. Graeme Reid, director of the LGBT Rights Program at Human Rights Watch, noted that Western powers had threatened to cut aid in the past, and that this may help explain today's misperception. In October, for example, UK Prime Minister David Cameron had threatened to withhold some aid from countries that outlaw homosexuality, though the money would only be redirected from a program called "budget support," which recipient governments prefer, to other programs such as humanitarian aid.

Reid suggested that misplaced fears about aid cuts could harm the effort to promote gay rights. "It's a very fraught issue, because of course cutting general development aid on the basis of a vulnerable and unpopular minority can have consequences for that minority," he said, even if the fears about losing foreign aid are actually unfounded, as with U.S. gay rights promotion. "They can be made more stigmatized and more vulnerable because suddenly it seems like they're bringing even more difficulty to the lives of the citizens of their country by being the cause of a cut in aid."

I didnt write the above.

 

[thekingsmen]

There isn't an agenda. This is how capitalism works. This is the same reason capitalism destroyed the previous, feudal social order. It doesn't obey rules of the previous social order if there is profit to be made (with a few exceptions, of course- Capitalism would not have ended and still won't end racism, for example.)

So here is the White Supremacy Agenda...Colonialism, Capitalism, Feminism, Globalism, Homosexuality, Apartheid, Racism, Sexism, Atheism, Religious Extremism, etc.

 

[Julius Skrrvin]

Wouldn't it be fair to say that they have an agenda?

If the industry has a disproportionately large gay presence, wouldn't it be feasable to say they have an agenda, if not for anything but to continue their dominance in the industry?

Agenda implies a plan, centralized organization, and cooperation. I don't see evidence of that. Is your evidence that they want to stay employed and successful in their field? If so then they don't need to promote homosexuality with cooperation to do just that?

Basically all of you guys are claiming that there is an overarching gay mafia type thing going on in the media and are not corroborating such allegations with any evidence besides subjective perceptions of TV content. You do realize how flimsy that is as an argument right?