Type Username Here
Not a new member
From Shutter Island:
Last edited by a moderator:
thats a good scene...great dialogue
People forget that, u take away how intelligent hmo sapiens are/have evolved into, the "meaning of life" is to survive by any means necessary, to be the head of the pack, and to reproduce
Violence is a part of human nature.
Take a look at history--From the fossil record of the paleolithic era to the 1900's and beyond.
Kennwick man looked very different from the people who inhabited the Americas. Is that why his body was littered with arrow points and traumatic damage?
We are controlled by tribalism, racism, violence and apathy, it's a part of all of us. However, it's a bell curve. there is a small minority that is ultra violent and a small minority that is always passive.
Nature made us this way because nature rewards the most violent. From the Zulu's that violently consolidated the Zulu nation, to the Mongols who spread their genes across Eurasia, to the European decedents who have control and majority populations on Multiple continents.
Say what you want about peace.......
Israel expanded its territory by 100% (iirc), and never gave it back. They got that land through violence. Moreover, They get to subjugate their enemies, and remove them from their homes without legal recourse.
I think it proves crazy people are not always seen as crazy(looks, career) until you get a chance to talk with them, and see how they have a twisted view of reality which means you better protect yourself or be a victim, which si what they want. They love violence, and confrontation as this keeps their brains alive and balance them out. As 50 cent said when he was beefing with bang 'em smurf at hot 97 summerjam, "I love the drama motherfukker"
I think that violence is really something done to protect against crazy, narcissistic people who tend to resort to violence to get what they want. To say nature made us this way is only seeing some of the picture. Mental disorder plays a big part on why the world is the way it is. We are diagnosing it now, but it has always been there. Even today, the people who tend to be in powerful occupations show heavy traits of narcissism. This is easily seen when you look at how corporations, and governments, are fukking up the world. In ancient times they just had a different name(church&royalty). In the animal, world it most likely happens but we see it as an animal being aggressive and strong but it may have brain problems and seeing things in a distorted way. Look at at pitbulls, when living in a wonderful, loving environment, they don't have a lot of aggression, but when raised in a hostile one they do and it passes on to their children until it is bred out of them. The hostile environment is most likely stressing their brain, and causing the aggression not because they naturally are.
I don't understand why you posted this video because it could mean one of them has a major mental disorder and causing a hostile environment for the rest which is like my pitbull analogy which is why they did what they did in the video.
You do know there was a study that showed when the chimpanzese or monkeys, I can't remember, who caused problems in a group were displaced, the group became more peaceful and everyone got along better. I wish I could find the study but I saw it on pbs a few years ago. I will try to find it so you can see I'm not bullshytting you.
The benefits of chimp warfare are clear enough, at least from the perspective of human observers. Through decades of careful work, primatologists have documented the links in a long causal chain, proving for instance that females with access to more fruit trees will bear children faster.
But can the chimps themselves foresee the outcome of their behavior? Do they calculate that if they pick off their neighbors one by one, they will eventually be able to annex their territory, which will raise their females fertility and the power of their group? I find that a difficult argument to sustain because the logical chain seems too deep, says Richard Wrangham, a chimp expert at Harvard.
A simpler explanation is that the chimps are just innately aggressive toward their neighbors, and that natural selection has shaped them this way because of the survival advantage that will accrue to the winner.
Wow, I think humans severly underestimate the intelligence of other creatures on the planet. And to assert we are the only self-conscious beings on this planet is probably false. I've been watching videos on apes and chimps lately and there is some evidence of extremely intelligent behavior. Maybe they cant communicate with us in a way that seems conscious, but they probably have some rudimentary form of consciousness, or even thoughts inside their heads.
Wow, I think humans severly underestimate the intelligence of other creatures on the planet. And to assert we are the only self-conscious beings on this planet is probably false. I've been watching videos on apes and chimps lately and there is some evidence of extremely intelligent behavior. Maybe they cant communicate with us in a way that seems conscious, but they probably have some rudimentary form of consciousness, or even thoughts inside their heads.
a long-term study of Chimpanzee wars found that the victors had a expanded their territory and resources. Nature rewarded them.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/22/science/22chimp.html?_r=0
Nature rewards the most violent and most aggressive.
Here... Watch the end of this video.
http://worldsciencefestival.com/videos/evolution
These are all top scientists. What do they all conclude? Human beings weren't born to be peaceful hippies.