in 2020, there will be a "untouchable" dark skinned underclass. the new face of blacks will be mostly bi-racial mixtures.
Not really. Even so,the white population will shrink rapidly when the baby boomers disappear.
in 2020, there will be a "untouchable" dark skinned underclass. the new face of blacks will be mostly bi-racial mixtures.
Not really. Even so,the white population will shrink rapidly when the baby boomers disappear.
in 2020, there will be a "untouchable" dark skinned underclass. the new face of blacks will be mostly bi-racial mixtures.
even if every black person in US procreated w/cacs, we'd get absorbed into their gene pool eventually.
So skin shade will determine black peoples financial status in the future or are you saying by the year 2020 black people will be so diluted that darkskin will be a minority? Either way,both charges don't make any sense because the vast majority of African Americans still resemble their ancestors when they arrived here four hundred years ago. also a person's skin shade does not determine their financial future.
I thought you were smarter than that, guess not
well, i still disagree, but i'll go with that. so what does that mean? still a dark skinned underclass, right? those that are in power and control, will look more euro-centric. those in the gutters, those with no voice or power; i'm just guessing, but i suspect they'll have the darker skin, agree or disagree?If anything, we be a more ratchet Brazil. The white folks are gonna disappear first since their birth rates are dropping rapidly.
well, i still disagree, but i'll go with that. so what does that mean? still a dark skinned underclass, right? those that are in power and control, will look more euro-centric. those in the gutters, those with no voice or power; i'm just guessing, but i suspect they'll have the darker skin, agree or disagree?
Skin tone won't be as important as $$$$.
if that's the case, where are all the daughters of wealthy families marrying nikkas at? i think the only example i can think of is jay electronica. meanwhile, any potato farming white chick with a decent body can snatch up a black millionaire athlete.
well we can argue that poverty (which is mostly associated with race) can determine financial status. but i'm saying blacks will make a deliberate effort to procreate with non-blacks, to shake the negative stigma of being black in america. those that cant, will be viewed as a underclass.
the new mixed offspring they bring up, those will be the nu blacks. wouldnt be surprised if they give out reparations for slavery to the mixed breeds. but nah, none of this by 2020, this is a few decades down the line, imo
No, education determines financial status not skin shade.By following your logic there wouldn't be more dark millionaires then light ones. In the near future,I don't see black people deliberately mixing themselves with intentions to dilute their family tree.
Are there are some exceptions?yes, but the level of self hatred is not that high. The more racist society becomes the closer it will force black people to come together opposed to mixing in hopes of eliminating racism and white supremacy.
trying telling this to all of the "overqualified" black men that have trouble finding gainful employment.
i'd like to believe more racist society would force blacks to work together. but unless they're stringing us up by trees and telling us we cant join their community, i don't think blacks will ever unify on that level.
The abortion rate may be high in the black community, but the white people that do that, both numbers and percentage wise, is much higher. Not trying to say copy off of whites, but you acting like abortion is a black only problem. Besides, its mostly the lower class blacks that have babies that do abortions. Would you like to see black folk give birth to more poor people that continue the cycle of poverty?
This is a republic, b. If this was a democracy there would not have had to been a damn court order to let us go to school. Numbers mean nothing when you don't have wealth, which is what @Wild self is trying to tell you.Yes,even the poor black people who don't home shyt and live on the government still have it far better than any poor person living in a third world country.
Why make it seem like the poverty in America is back breaking like the third world poverty?
I don't support able bodied people leaching off the government, however if a family needs financial assistance from the government,then so be it.
It sounds like you believe black people should use abortion as a form of birth control just because they're poor and I can't endorse that line of thinking.
Yes, poor as well as financially stable black people need increase our population because numbers mean a lot in a democracy.
You do know what a democracy means right?
The majority will win while the minority is subject to whatever the majority wants.
Whites may not have the comfort of those white collar jobs due to the recession but they still have access to more capital and opportunities than black people regardless of said white persons socioeconomic status.
Also,even though you have white trash, they have standards and boundaries they won't cross or compromise when it comes to certain behavior especially in reference to their identity.