Bystander effect breh. Everybody looks around and expects someone else to do something. Hell, look at what you just posted. You expect another black man to lose his freedom to take out Zimmerman.Black folks aint united like that.
Until shyt becomes really personal (like a member of your family gets hurt) most people (not just blacks) don't have it in them to take an aggressive action such as shooting a gun or physically attacking someone.
As far as putting another black man down goes, it's the same shyt. nikkas aren't out here killing other nikkas unless it's personal (i.e. a vendetta or for financial gain). Even gang members don't just ride around shooting people for no reason.
It all does reads marvellously well but...
Do you then mind enlighten some of us less versed as to what 'Matthew Apperson' stand to gain through the act in which he undertook?
- Perhaps the two are indeed biologically related?
- I bet the late Trayvon Martin did had cousins, niece, aunts, and I dare say at least two brothers and a father, no? Right.
Surely, surely one realises and acknowledges that ones kinsmen and women are utterly defenceless imbeciles when in what can be depicted as 'one of opposition half scores an own goal out of mere pity'?
Let me tell you, none of you git could so much as muster challenge here:
nor are you able to now.
Hence the saying reads: 'The sooner we acknowledge our shortcoming, the better'.
Last edited:
"
fukk is funny about this?
