In what ways
because frank miller's comic was violent doesn't mean the joker was any different in personality, it was the same character
ledger's joker is an entirely different character, a rather uninteresting one at that
Wesley Snipes' Version Of The Joker >>>> Jack And Heath.
- Thread starter R.O. Double
- Start date
In what ways
because frank miller's comic was violent doesn't mean the joker was any different in personality, it was the same character
ledger's joker is an entirely different character, a rather uninteresting one at that
But your core point is that tdk joker and others are invalid and that only 89 joker which is essentially a darker version of Adam west era joker is legit...and that's total fukking Bullshyt.
Man, you're all over the place.
There is no such thing as a "typical Batman story". That's like saying the '89 "Batman" movie ain't legit because it wasn't campy like the TV series which came before it.
And I never said Frank Miller's version was the same as Heath Ledgers....I said there's been dark versions of the character. As well as goofy, funny versions. As well as video game versions....as well as cartoons. All of them are The Joker.
I seen both versions in theaters....yes, I'm that old....and there was nothing scary, creepy, or serious about Nicholson's version. It was a modern twist on Cesar Romero....like Ledger's was a twist on "The Killing Joke", etc. Likewise the movie itself had zero stakes....all the shyt you're talking about is window dressing. It was never in doubt Batman would win. Meanwhile in "The Dark Knight" The Joker not only turned Dent into Two-Face he killed Rachel and made Batman indirectly take the blame for all his actions. There is more to adult content than blood and sexual innuendos.
Fred.
Kill Dat Noize
Banned
breh...
the joker wasn't a normal bad guy. he was beyond that. he had plans on plans on plans. just when you thought you had him cornered, he had another devious plot ready to hatch.
the joker was a threat of the like never seen before. his arrival in gotham marked the birth of the first true supervillain. i don't know what else to tell you. i thought the movie conveyed that pretty clearly.
Whether you were interested that's on you. Clearly you prefer joy buzzers and flower gas over grenades and random murders.
Joker blew up fukking hospitals for the laugher of the chaos it created. He was an outstanding version of the character. He fukked with batman just to fukk with him. In comics he 'killed' Jason Todd for the same reasons.
Modern joker does evil shyt because it amuses him...because he's super..super fukked up...sorry he isn't a goofier clown.
And that IS A HUGE problem with a lot of criticisms about comic movies...it really hurts perceptions of superman but that's an entirely different thread
He blew up and empty hospital, shyt Dennis Hopper was more trill in Speed
So basically Joker in Dark Knight equals every bomber in movie history
Yes the Joy Buzzer scene was more entertaining than anything in the Dark Knight
joker talking to the dead corpse was classic material
joker doing the commercials taking over the TV, classic villain stuff, every scene the joker is in is gold in that movie
with ledger it's oh, look at weird he looks, oh he's dressed like a drag, his whole scene turning two face to dark side, the hospital, all that shyt was trash man
lmao show me any joker that resembles the heath ledger that's from any type of material that's considered good
there is none
Wesley Snipes as Simon Phoenix is really the closest thing we'd ever gotten to the comic book Joker. Only Mark Hamill's DCAU Joker (imo) has come closer.
The jokes, the ruthlessness, the unpredictability, the maniacal laughter, the coolness.
This nikka is The Joker that we've always wanted to see go up against Batman.
Jack Nicholson was cool, but his Joker was over the top and damn near cartoony. You didn't realize how much he was overacting until he basically did the same character is The Departed.
Heath Ledger's Joker was good, he had people ahook, but he didn't have that sense of humor like The Joker should. nikka seemed like he was depressed. I could easily see him as part of the Trench Coat Mafia. Plus it felt like he was doing a version of Mankind/Raven as The Joker.
Now Simon Phoenix.
He was everything the Joker should be.
to Wesley for showing how it should be done.
This is just
R.O. Double
Holdin My Balls Since 83
This thread is funny but.....How can you play a great Joker if you not the damn Joker? Why not throw in the fact Wesley played a better Batman than Christian Bale with his portrayl of Blade?Bane played a great Apocalypse because he sounded just like the cartoon version
....you could start saying this about alot of movie characters if we just gon compare regardless of who they were actually playing....im pretty sure when most people watched Demolition Man that The Joker never crossed they mind,until now
My bad on the delayed response breh. I been working.
First of all I gotta say.
nikka, I explained everything in my first post. Simon Phoenix fits the criteria of what the Joker should be.
Your comparisons are baseless.
Dirty Mcdrawz
Your girl loves em....
Wesley Snipe's version of the joker
:reach:
R.O. Double
Holdin My Balls Since 83
Dirty Mcdrawz
Your girl loves em....
You never heard of Simon Phoenix?
:simpson: I'm not @satam55 of course I've Heard of Simon Phoenix. I just don't agree with your opinion. There are many incarnations of the joker and trying to pigeon hole him into a single criteria destroys who he is.....
Last edited: