We need decentralized communication, now.

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
53,064
Reputation
8,012
Daps
151,420

John Boyer
Sep 29 ·

The U.S. and the U.K. have formed a treaty, forcing WhatsApp, Facebook, and other social media platforms to hand over the encryption keys of certain individuals, allowing these authorities to read their private messages.

This treaty has disturbing implications. WhatsApp uses the Signal protocol, which guarantees end-to-end encryption, preventing even their employees from reading your confidential messages. This means the only way WhatsApp could comply with these demands is by fundamentally altering their software in contradiction to the Signal protocol.

Consider being forced to remove the lock on your door to allow the NSA, the FBI, or the police to come visit anytime without a notice, warrant, or probable cause. This will render the online communications of everyone less secure, not just those of suspected criminals.

The U.S. government already forces companies to surrender any collected user data at will. They are now compelling businesses to undermine their security and create backdoors, thus further violating the privacy of their citizens. This new treaty is leading the U.S. in the direction of Australia’s ban on encryption, which was, on its own, an unprecedented assault on privacy.

The two governments claim this will only be used against suspected terrorists, pedophiles and other serious criminals. However, James Clapper, the former Director of National Intelligence, perjured himself by making the same claim, under oath, to an unaware U.S. Congress. Edward Snowden’s leaked NSA documents later proved his statements false. For decades, the privacy of millions of innocent Americans has been violated in the name of security, and things are only getting worse.

Decentralization is paramount to restoring privacy and freedom to the internet. As long as there are centralized service providers for communication platforms, the U.S. will use them to tighten its authoritative grip, silencing dissent with FISA gag orders and threats of shutting down their services.

Matrix is a secure and decentralized communication protocol. This specification is an open standard designed to make privacy and security the default of the web. Riot is one of the leading open source implementations of Matrix, providing end-to-end encrypted private chats, group chats, and VoIP in a decentralized manner.

Although Riot has made significant progress in the past few months, there is still a long way to go before it becomes a suitable drop-in replacement for platforms such as WhatsApp or Discord. The single greatest factor that is holding back mass adoption of decentralized and privacy-oriented applications is the lackluster user experience.

Start using Riot. Create an account, make an encrypted room, invite some friends and send some messages. Take note of every bug, typo or general inconvenience, and file an issue on the Riot GitHub repository. If you are a programmer, contribute to the project (open source development looks great on a resume). If you have the means, donate to the Matrix Foundation.

The usability of Riot must improve. The importance of “it just works” cannot be understated in bringing privacy and security to the masses. Try it out, get involved, and help make the internet a better place.

This is not a sponsored article. This is a call to action — to make privacy and decentralized applications the norm.
 

The Minister Of Culture

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
6,370
Reputation
3,600
Daps
43,254
I’ve tried to get people in my immediate area in that wave put they don’t wanna listen Signal,Wire,Riot or any other XMPP client is what we should heading towards with this shroud of anti privacy laws & attics from the gov looming over our heads.
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
53,064
Reputation
8,012
Daps
151,420
I’ve tried to get people in my immediate area in that wave put they don’t wanna listen Signal,Wire,Riot or any other XMPP client is what we should heading towards with this shroud of anti privacy laws & attics from the gov looming over our heads.

years ago i thought xmpp and sip would be poppin but sadly it didn't turn out that way. i remember when google had xmpp support for google talk on their todo list and they just stopped any interoperability talk as a whole. federated protocols need to be widely adopted.
 
Last edited:

DetroitEWarren

Superstar
Joined
Jul 15, 2012
Messages
18,269
Reputation
6,329
Daps
57,734
Reppin
Detroit You bytch Ass nikka
If in not doing no felonious shyt in my messages, why should i care if a random government nerd seen my personal messages? Especially if it can prevent terrorist attacks and rapey situations?


I dont get it. Why are people so mad about this. Are u a low key fakkit sending pics to dudes you fukkin queer? Think your wife can get that info from the government :mjlol:, dumbass.


Ill never understand unimportant ass regular ass people acting like someone gives a fukk about them enough to be affected by this, u aint that important dawg.
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
53,064
Reputation
8,012
Daps
151,420
If in not doing no felonious shyt in my messages, why should i care if a random government nerd seen my personal messages? Especially if it can prevent terrorist attacks and rapey situations?


I dont get it. Why are people so mad about this. Are u a low key fakkit sending pics to dudes you fukkin queer? Think your wife can get that info from the government :mjlol:, dumbass.


Ill never understand unimportant ass regular ass people acting like someone gives a fukk about them enough to be affected by this, u aint that important dawg.

if our communications is so unimportant, they wouldn't be working so hard to retain our data and build a digital database on each civilians lives. the fact that you don't realize this is unprecedented and something the statsi themselves couldn't have conceived of is very telling.
 

The Minister Of Culture

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
6,370
Reputation
3,600
Daps
43,254
if our communications is so unimportant, they wouldn't be working so hard to retain our data and build a digital database on each civilians lives.

^this also why would microsoft and now google more recently have plans to make underwater datacenters and what type of data are they storing exactly
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
53,064
Reputation
8,012
Daps
151,420
I'd add in addition to that we need more viable mesh networks. localized sites less proned to non-local interference such as trolling, surveillance, harassment, manipulation, etc.
 

DetroitEWarren

Superstar
Joined
Jul 15, 2012
Messages
18,269
Reputation
6,329
Daps
57,734
Reppin
Detroit You bytch Ass nikka
if our communications is so unimportant, they wouldn't be working so hard to retain our data and build a digital database on each civilians lives. the fact that you don't realize this is unprecedented and something the statsi themselves couldn't have conceived of is very telling.
I just dont give a fukk. Im not a faq, i dont talk to kids online, im not selling dope in my messages, at most im inboxing a few bytches tryin to link up. How will this affect my life negatively? It might stop my child from being shot or raped though :yeshrug:
 

The Minister Of Culture

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
6,370
Reputation
3,600
Daps
43,254
I just dont give a fukk. Im not a faq, i dont talk to kids online, im not selling dope in my messages, at most im inboxing a few bytches tryin to link up. How will this affect my life negatively? It might stop my child from being shot or raped though :yeshrug:

it's not that you have something to hide its just the principle of that you have nothing you want the goverment or any 3 letter agencies to see. Privacy is more than just bad people trying to hide clandestine operations breh.
 

DetroitEWarren

Superstar
Joined
Jul 15, 2012
Messages
18,269
Reputation
6,329
Daps
57,734
Reppin
Detroit You bytch Ass nikka
it's not that you have something to hide its just the principle of that you have nothing you want the goverment or any 3 letter agencies to see. Privacy is more than just bad people trying to hide clandestine operations breh.
Yea, i feel u but if the exchange is a safer country and less mass murder terrorist out here then its fine imo. Now if jobs, business partners, ect can access this shyt then im against it for sure.
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
53,064
Reputation
8,012
Daps
151,420
I just dont give a fukk. Im not a faq, i dont talk to kids online, im not selling dope in my messages, at most im inboxing a few bytches tryin to link up. How will this affect my life negatively? It might stop my child from being shot or raped though :yeshrug:

COINTELPRO - Wikipedia

COINTELPRO (portmanteau derived from COunter INTELligence PROgram) (1956–1971) was a series of covert and, at times, illegal[1][2] projects conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) aimed at surveilling, infiltrating, discrediting, and disrupting domestic political organizations.[3][4] FBI records show that COINTELPRO resources targeted groups and individuals that the FBI deemed subversive,[5] including feminist organizations,[6] the Communist Party USA,[7] anti–Vietnam War organizers, activists of the civil rights movement or Black Power movement (e.g. Martin Luther King Jr., the Nation of Islam, and the Black Panther Party), environmentalist and animal rights organizations, the American Indian Movement (AIM), independence movements (such as Puerto Rican independence groups like the Young Lords), and a variety of organizations that were part of the broader New Left. The program also targeted the Ku Klux Klan in 1964.[8]

According to Noam Chomsky, in another instance in San Diego, the FBI financed, armed, and controlled an extreme right-wing group of former members of the Minutemen anti-communist para-military organization, transforming it into a group called the Secret Army Organization that targeted groups, activists, and leaders involved in the Anti-War Movement, using both intimidation and violent acts.[9][10][11]

The FBI has used covert operations against domestic political groups since its inception; however, covert operations under the official COINTELPRO label took place between 1956 and 1971.[12] COINTELPRO tactics are still used to this day and have been alleged to include discrediting targets through psychological warfare; smearing individuals and groups using forged documents and by planting false reports in the media; harassment; wrongful imprisonment; and illegal violence, including assassination.[13][14][15][16] The FBI's stated motivation was "protecting national security, preventing violence, and maintaining the existing social and political order".[17]

Groups that were known to be targets of COINTELPRO operations include"


'I've Got Nothing to Hide' and Other Misunderstandings of Privacy
SSRN-id998565('I've Got Nothing to Hide' and Other Misunderstandings of Privacy).pdf - AnonFile
'I've Got Nothing to Hide' and Other Misunderstandings of Privacy by Daniel J. Solove :: SSRN


Privacy Is Not Secrecy; Debunking The 'If You've Got Nothing To Hide...' Argument

a snippet:
Commentators often attempt to refute the nothing-to-hide argument by pointing to things people want to hide. But the problem with the nothing-to-hide argument is the underlying assumption that privacy is about hiding bad things. By accepting this assumption, we concede far too much ground and invite an unproductive discussion about information that people would very likely want to hide. As the computer-security specialist Schneier aptly notes, the nothing-to-hide argument stems from a faulty "premise that privacy is about hiding a wrong." Surveillance, for example, can inhibit such lawful activities as free speech, free association, and other First Amendment rights essential for democracy.

The deeper problem with the nothing-to-hide argument is that it myopically views privacy as a form of secrecy. In contrast, understanding privacy as a plurality of related issues demonstrates that the disclosure of bad things is just one among many difficulties caused by government security measures.
It goes on to note that even if you have nothing to hide, there are plenty of reasons why a loss of privacy should concern you: One such harm, for example, which I call aggregation, emerges from the fusion of small bits of seemingly innocuous data. When combined, the information becomes much more telling. By joining pieces of information we might not take pains to guard, the government can glean information about us that we might indeed wish to conceal. For example, suppose you bought a book about cancer. This purchase isn't very revealing on its own, for it indicates just an interest in the disease. Suppose you bought a wig. The purchase of a wig, by itself, could be for a number of reasons. But combine those two pieces of information, and now the inference can be made that you have cancer and are undergoing chemotherapy. That might be a fact you wouldn't mind sharing, but you'd certainly want to have the choice.

Another potential problem with the government's harvest of personal data is one I call exclusion. Exclusion occurs when people are prevented from having knowledge about how information about them is being used, and when they are barred from accessing and correcting errors in that data. Many government national-security measures involve maintaining a huge database of information that individuals cannot access. Indeed, because they involve national security, the very existence of these programs is often kept secret. This kind of information processing, which blocks subjects' knowledge and involvement, is a kind of due-process problem. It is a structural problem, involving the way people are treated by government institutions and creating a power imbalance between people and the government. To what extent should government officials have such a significant power over citizens? This issue isn't about what information people want to hide but about the power and the structure of government.
 

The Minister Of Culture

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
6,370
Reputation
3,600
Daps
43,254
Yea, i feel u but if the exchange is a safer country and less mass murder terrorist out here then its fine imo. Now if jobs, business partners, ect can access this shyt then im against it for sure.

the reason why @bnew is talkng about the communications is due to certain goverment/lobbyist groups are tip toeing and crossing that line between keeping us safe and invading our privacy & also finding loopholes.Its not widely talked about on the news (except fot the facebook cambridge analytica shyt)cause most people dont know what really is going on. I might start a privacy thread soon in the 6 cert forums explaing questions like ones you have and other info.
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
53,064
Reputation
8,012
Daps
151,420
the reason why @bnew is talkng about the communications is due to certain goverment/lobbyist groups are tip toeing and crossing that line between keeping us safe and invading our privacy & also finding loopholes.Its not widely talked about on the news (except fot the facebook cambridge analytica shyt)cause most people dont know what really is going on. I might start a privacy thread soon in the 6 cert forums explaing questions like ones you have and other info.

in the last 20 years we've really gotten to a point like no other period in history where technology has surpassed the majority of peoples understanding especially in regard to privacy violations. The majority of people have no idea they're being violated daily.

people install apps and give no thought to what that app may be doing in the background. how many free flashlight apps were created with the sole purpose of stealing contacts, sms photos etc? they got away with it too.
 
Top