WB Shelves Coyote vs Acme

feelosofer

#ninergang
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
47,478
Reputation
6,531
Daps
132,050
Reppin
Brick City, NJ
This is unfortunate because worst case people would check for it just for the fukkery. Some streamer would buy it because it is a classic character and concept.
 

Piff Perkins

Veteran
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
51,625
Reputation
18,782
Daps
281,263
Honestly, a lot of these companies not just WB are at that point because the streaming game is a money losing venture.

And they're often being run by old school television execs who are coming into this completely unprepared. Guys like Zaslav who was once an NBC exec came from an environment where money was real. Budgets, views, advertising dollars. The revenue was real, the profits were real, success was tangible and explainable. With streaming you're dealing with infinite budgets of fake money, "successful" shows that cannot truly be accounted for financially, and investment money that hinges on subscriber numbers that frankly aren't impressive. It's an endless game of debt leverage and investment and sooner or later the hot potatoes get too hot to pass to the next guy.

Seems pretty obvious that we're speeding to an end game where Apple and Amazon are the last standing, unless someone like Alphabet Inc (Google) enters the game. Basically streaming is going to be what gaming is to Microsoft. An added service or content that's used to help market real products that make real money. Amazon Prime rakes in cash whether people are watching shows/movies or not. Apple rakes in cash and their most ardent supporters don't even know they have a streaming service.
 

Thavoiceofthevoiceless

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 26, 2019
Messages
42,607
Reputation
2,995
Daps
131,137
Reppin
The Voiceless Realm
And when they feel someone is exploiting them it is in the american public’s best interest to close them, unless they believe it is part of the plan.
Why would they do that when they are all in cahoots together? Only the rich can exploit those loopholes as the majority of people don’t have the resources to figure it out.

One of these days people are going to realize that.
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
67,524
Reputation
10,927
Daps
235,202
Reppin
206 & 734
Why would they do that when they are all in cahoots together? Only the rich can exploit those loopholes as the majority of people don’t have the resources to figure it out.

One of these days people are going to realize that.
…do you think you’re teaching me something here?

If the IRS believes that purposefully tanking a movie, purposefully failing and causing a loss (not accelerating depreciation, or spreading a loss out over years) is a form of tax evasion, they will probably take issue with it. The IRS is a collection agency for the government, that’s it. If congress has a tax POLICY, and the irs feels someone is circumventing it…that is a concern of theirs.

The ‘in cahoots’ is how policy is created by congress, infuenced by the rich and congress’ corporate controllers. But this is about warner brothers potentially steppingmout of that policy to evade taxes.
 

Thavoiceofthevoiceless

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 26, 2019
Messages
42,607
Reputation
2,995
Daps
131,137
Reppin
The Voiceless Realm
…do you think you’re teaching me something here?

If the IRS believes that purposefully tanking a movie, purposefully failing and causing a loss (not accelerating depreciation, or spreading a loss out over years) is a form of tax evasion, they will probably take issue with it. The IRS is a collection agency for the government, that’s it. If congress has a tax POLICY, and the irs feels someone is circumventing it…that is a concern of theirs.

The ‘in cahoots’ is how policy is created by congress, infuenced by the rich and congress’ corporate controllers. But this is about warner brothers potentially steppingmout of that policy to evade taxes.
Them taking issue with it means nothing in the grand scheme of things as long as they continue to allow loopholes for these type of things to happen is my point.

Let’s not act like the rich haven’t been exploiting those type of loopholes for years yet they keep allowing it to happen
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
67,524
Reputation
10,927
Daps
235,202
Reppin
206 & 734
Them taking issue with it means nothing in the grand scheme of things as long as they continue to allow loopholes for these type of things to happen is my point.

Let’s not act like the rich haven’t been exploiting those type of loopholes for years yet they keep allowing it to happen
Who is “they” in this conversation? Congress or the IRS?

Congress CREATES the loopholes. The irs catches people trying to create their own.
 
Top