No I mean all American women. You give to much credence to racial difference the base is still the sameThe deck is stacked in women's favor?
You mean white women right?
No I mean all American women. You give to much credence to racial difference the base is still the sameThe deck is stacked in women's favor?
You mean white women right?
The why is to gauge the feasibility of such programs being implemented on a larger-scale in the future.Why…..?
And from where…?
In 2022, the D.C. government announced a pilot program that offered 132 new and expecting low-income mothers $10,800 over the course of a year — no strings attached — intended to assess how unconditional cash payments could improve their families’ outcomes and economic mobility.
Facilitated by the nonprofit Martha’s Table, the $1.5 million Strong Families, Strong Futures pilot was limited to families in Wards 5, 7 and 8, which contain some of the District’s poorest neighborhoods. The city’s program was based on similar successful cash-transfer pilots that have now been modeled in at least 100 U.S. jurisdictions and drew 1,553 applications in just three weeks, requiring a lottery system to winnow down the final group.
All 132 mothers had to choose whether they wanted 12 monthly payments of $900 or the entire amount immediately in a lump sum, a unique feature of D.C.’s pilot. About 75 percent chose the lump sum — which was better for those also receiving government benefits, for whom monthly payments from the pilot were more likely to be flagged as additional income, potentially affecting their eligibility, said David Lloyd, the deputy chief of programs at Martha’s Table.
Did it work? Program coordinators at Martha’s Table say that over the pilot’s duration, the moms reported spending the majority of their funds on needs such as housing, food and transportation. Comparing responses from the middle of the program’s first year to the closing months, participants increasingly said they were using the money to build up cash savings for the future, illustrating a behavioral shift toward financial security — a core goal of the pilot.
Nah just mad I got to live in a society with gaslighting ass women and simp nikkas like you who carry water for them. But carry on
Who's upsetFirst you’re upset that women in need are getting help, now you’re using vaginal terms like gaslighting.
Y’all the weakest generation of men who ever existed.
Why would men get anything? They didn't birth the child. Lol I can't even with some of yall brehsNone for the men? That darn patriarchy and toxic masculinity rearing its ugly head again
You're treating people who give birth differently then those that don't. Is that not discriminatory?Why would men get anything? They didn't birth the child. Lol I can't even with some of yall brehs
Go sit down and have a conversation with your grandfather and tell him women are gaslighting you.Who's upset
Gaslighting is a most definitely vaginal term since it mostly women who quote unquote gaslight men ie you calling an entire generation of men weak for one faceless poster highlighting how full of shyt most women in this country are. Textbook definition of gaslighting
I'm sure knowing DC if u identify as a woman ull get it to. So nah not discriminatory breh....You're treating people who give birth differently then those that don't. Is that not discriminatory?
giving the poor scraps to keep them happy and under control
Grandpas been dead. If you were smart enough you would have caught how I'm mocking American women with my use of the term gaslighting. But you're not smart.Go sit down and have a conversation with your grandfather and tell him women are gaslighting you.
Then go reflect on his wisdom and change your life.
Nobody told them to have multiple babies out of wedlock and broke.giving the poor scraps to keep them happy and under control