Was Emancipation Constitutional?

[Json]

The Constitution was considered a living document meant to be added to and changed.

Saying something is unconstitutional is a weird argument to begin with.

 

[OfTheCross]

The Constitution was considered a living document meant to be added to and changed.

Saying something is unconstitutional is a weird argument to begin with.

There are Constitutional ways of changing it. If it's outside of those bounds, it'd be unconstitutional.

 

[Json]

There are Constitutional ways of changing it. If it's outside of those bounds, it'd be unconstitutional.

I mean in the fact we can add stuff to the Constitution.

The Constitution in modern times has become a bible to Originalist, when in reality it closer to a dictionary. Meanings change and words can be added.

we could just clarify what “ right to bear arms is” instead of trying to parce the meaning from dudes who had no idea what concealed carry even is.