Was Buddha A Black African Or Not?

Drummage_EL

Drummage_EL

Pro
Joined
Oct 9, 2013
Messages
1,202
Reputation
-780
Daps
1,414
lotty said:
Doing what I stated in my previous post. Thank you for proving me right AGAIN. Those are just quick links, do the rest yourself. And only one was old, and gave that because it was from an actual person who seen this with their own eyes. But you dont like it so you ignore it lime I thought you would.

The source of the caste system was based on skin color and a certain group of people in its essence...... fukk it, believe what you want. You really need to learn deeper about things. I feel like Im arguing with a child who only sees things the way a child would. And the caste system is fairly new when looking how old the so called hindu culture is.

Anyway for others, this is a good read about the buddha. The whole website is thought provoking:
http://realhistoryww.com/world_history/ancient/Indus_Valley_India_3.htm
The Buddhist

Another, who led a religious movement to relieve suffering, was a prince named "Siddhartha Gautama", later to be known as the "Buddha" (Great Teacher). Siddhartha was born into the Sakya tribe at the foot of the Himalayan Mountains, just north of the Ganges Valley. Siddhartha lived in a small city named "Kapilavastu" (in what is now southern Nepal). He is reported to have seen his native city over-run and its people butchered by the Arians. The Sakya tribe was under Arian suzerainty, but had retained it's independence in exchange for a tribute paid to Arian overlords. The Sakya tribe had aristocrats and commoners, and according to legend, Siddhartha was a prince.

According to legend, in his youth, Siddhartha had been sheltered from the ugliness and poverty all around him. But when he was twenty nine - around 534 B.C. - he decided to become a wanderer. Apparently Siddhartha withdrew from a world, that he saw as inhospitable to conquered royalty such as he. Though he was disturbed by the Arian's, he was also fascinated by the Arian people who had destroyed his state and its traditions. The legend created by his followers, describes Siddhartha as having become a wanderer, in order to learn about human existence. He became an ascetic and abused his body by hardly eating. After accepting failure, in his quest to gain understanding of human existence, Siddhartha began eating better, and he began devising what he believed were better solutions to human misery.
Click to expand...

I like that website you posted. But I question the validity of it. From what I've seen, the editor of that site categorizes all dark-skinned people as negroes. And that's extremely inaccurate.
 
GetInTheTruck

GetInTheTruck

Member
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
15,661
Reputation
-736
Daps
27,703
Reppin
Queens
lotty said:
Heres something elese to read:
http://proudblackbuddhist.org/Dr. Iniyan Elango.htm

T

A History of India, observes as follows:"The main stress in the ordering of castes appears to have been the division of society into brahmans and non-bramans (in Tamil Nadu). Among the non-brahmans there is as compared to north India, little mention of the `Kshatriyas' and the Vysyas' but the `shudras' are prominent. The `Shudras' were divided (in south India) into the clean Shudras whose touch was not polluting and the unclean Shudras (Panchamas-Dalits) who were debarred from entry into the temple. The picture which emerges suggests that the Brahmans were in control of powerful positions and that the non-Brahmans were more or less working for them. The Brahmans naturally emphasized caste loyalties and caste assemblies, since this would prevent a wider basis of unity developing amongst the the non-brahmans (Tamils)."The above phenomena is peculiar to the region of Tamil Nadu where the Dravidians have been pitted against fellow Dravidians by the cunning and wily Brahmans who spearhead the Hindu caste religion. In the rest of India all caste Hindus, where upper or lower caste, are all Caucasoid and brown skinned. Dalits are all starkly differentiated by their indigenous features and black skin. It is not uncommon to find fair skinned people among Dalits, just like some fair skinned African-Americans. But it should be observed that even fair skinned Dalits are differentiated by their indigenous features, while Hindus whose colour varies from dark brown to ivory are easily differentiated by their caucasoid features.Sources: Without Malice: The Truth About India, by Iniyan Elango
A History of India, by Romila ThaparEnd of part 1*Iniyan Elango, M.D. graduated from the Madras Medical College in 1989 with a degree in Medicine and Surgery. He subsequently studied and traveled extensive in Europe and the United States for three years. He is the author of Without Malice: The Truth About India. Dr. Elango can be contacted at tamilhumanrights@hotmail.com**Runoko Rashidi is an historian and writer currently coordinating an educational tour of Aboriginal Australia for July 2000. To schedule lectures, order audio and video tapes and acquire information about the tour contact Rashidi at RRashidi@swbell.net or call (210) 648-5178. Visit Rashidi's Global African Presence web site at http://www.cwo.com/~lucumi/runoko.html
Click to expand...

Runoko Rashidi, great :snoop:

All South Indians regardless of caste are Dravidians because they all speak Dravidian languages. Dravidian isn't a racial category, it's a language grouping. All Indians belong to the same race, including Brahmins who never mix or marry outside their caste.

This guy is the most famous dalit ever :

dalit-voice-dr-ambedkar2.jpg


here is a typical south indian brahmin:

Brahmin_Priest.jpg


most dalits in India aint even dravidians or south indian. just stop.
 
M

Mr. Pink

All Star
Joined
Jun 14, 2012
Messages
3,050
Reputation
-430
Daps
5,942
lotty said:
I was watching the bbc documentary "murderous minds of europeans" and it just added to the proof how evil these people are and how they have fukked up the world.
Click to expand...
Ah yes, the evil europeans with twirling mustaches victimizing the mythical "peaceful savage".:snoop:
How new and refreshing.
 
bouncy

bouncy

Banned
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
5,153
Reputation
1,110
Daps
7,061
Reppin
NULL
post: 7707115, member: 594"]Runoko Rashidi, great :snoop:

All South Indians regardless of caste are Dravidians because they all speak Dravidian languages. Dravidian isn't a racial category, it's a language grouping. All Indians belong to the same race, including Brahmins who never mix or marry outside their caste.

This guy is the most famous dalit ever :

dalit-voice-dr-ambedkar2.jpg


here is a typical south indian brahmin:

Brahmin_Priest.jpg


most dalits in India aint even dravidians or south indian. just stop.[/quote]
You are such a dingdong. I dont like calling names but you are so ignorant and dont even know it.

Of course they all have brown skin, its fukking India for gods sake. The point is dalits have features that are no doubt connected with african features. Its not just skin color. Even the article I posted states this butnyou happen to not mention that part. Wake the fukk up. You always state the obvious which is why I feel like Im dealing withma child.

Why not show how dalits look today?. You are being deceptive and you know it. Here are dalits of today, not no black and white picture
photo_zoom.gne

x.jpg

x.jpg

dalits1.jpg


I notice when you did your google search for pictures of brahmin you picked the closest one that has more features we associate with black to play games with everyone but most of those pictures, the brahmin priest look different then the one you posted. My head is hurting dealing with you. Im done.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top