Yal aren't saying the same thing. Playing time was never an issue with James Harden in OKC.
Playing time is the main issue with Kuminga in GS. That's a fundamental difference in the argument.
No.
They are both held back.
to low ball in future negotiations.
Harden was close to leading rhe ncaa or lead rhe ncaa in scoring.
Harden was kept on the bench and six man. So he would be the odd man out financially for okc to low ball. Same with kuminga.
Kuminga was just not allowed any or much esrly playing time. Simply because of the excuse of locale and Kerr having a standard unit.
Yet same thing.
Kuminga was not allowed a real chance to do just like Harden.
Simply because the fo wanted to low ball Harden and kuminga.
Same thing here.
As far as administrative bullshyt to achieve a similar goal.
No difference.
Art Barr