WaPo about to drop a story on Kim Mulkey and she’s shook

[FaTaL]

She had hidden cameras?

 

[Anerdyblackguy]

Definitely some racist shyt on her part. She probably said a lot of racist shyt to her coaches and players

 

[RoCKetSity256]

How can she claim the story is one-sided or bad journalism if the article hasn't even come out yet?


She says, "This is why people don't trust the media", and she's exactly right. People like her preemptively shyt on the media WITHOUT EVEN KNOWING WHAT THE MEDIA IS ACTUALLY GOING TO SAY, not because the media did anything wrong. How does she know whether the story will be fair or biased, accurate or misleading, if she hasn't seen any of it yet?

Before I even know what it’s about I’m assuming she’s guilty. But I’m pretty sure the former students they tried to get statements from told her what it’s about because they were asked about it right?

 

[Ron Mexico]

Yeah she sounds like a plantation owner's wife in her interviews

Don't know how black girls sign up to play for her. Especially after that Griner situation.

 

[wire28]

She was there on Jan 6

 

[Ed MOTHERFUCKING G]

Don't know how black girls sign up to play for her. Especially after that Griner situation.

That's very telling

 

[Professor Emeritus]

Before I even know what it’s about I’m assuming she’s guilty. But I’m pretty sure the former students they tried to get statements from told her what it’s about because they were asked about it right?

But no matter what the story is about, it could be reported accurately or it could be reported inaccurately. She didn't present a single piece of evidence from her players that WaPo was biased or was failing to tell the "good" side of the story. The very fact that they spoke to players who are loyal to her suggests they're looking for all sides of the story, right?

 

[Koapa]

What is it, her shyty outfits aren't fashion forward.

 

[concise]

I wonder if that mysterious Angel Reese "suspension" from earlier this season will be discussed.

 

[Elim Garak]

fukkery incoming.

 

[Rocket Scientist]

Probably something between her and Angel.

 

[RoCKetSity256]

But no matter what the story is about, it could be reported accurately or it could be reported inaccurately. She didn't present a single piece of evidence from her players that WaPo was biased or was failing to tell the "good" side of the story. The very fact that they spoke to players who are loyal to her suggests they're looking for all sides of the story, right?

She said they spoke to disgruntled players also. We pretty much know she knows what they’re reporting on.

 

[Bleedin Gums Murphy]

A bad story about this lady?



I’m shocked.

 

[L. Deezy]

It's over

 

[Professor Emeritus]

She said they spoke to disgruntled players also. We pretty much know she knows what they’re reporting on.

And that's all she knows, which is my point. WHAT they're reporting on tells you nothing regarding HOW WELL they are going to report it.

How can you claim they are being dishonest if you only know the subject and haven't even seen the actual reporting yet?