Good on you. Though, you do have a propensity to react very emotionally on this website. So while your statement above is a good one, your past actions displayed in your postings do not align with your claim above.
VP Kamala Harris Walks into the Lion's Den on FOX News. UPDATE: FOX Reporter Admits He fukked Up
- Thread starter the bossman
- Start date
Good on you. Though, you do have a propensity to react very emotionally on this website. So while your statement above is a good one, your past actions displayed in your postings do not align with your claim above.
RickyDiBiase
The Sword of Jesus of Nazareth
I was unaware I need to be a robot, but ok.
No, but you don't have to allow your emotions to run rampant either. There is a middle ground, you know.
RickyDiBiase
The Sword of Jesus of Nazareth
If my emotions are so rampant, I wouldn't have the life I currently have.
I don't know what life you have. I only know what life you live on this website. Your actions on this website demonstrates a lack of control. You state you are 40 years old, but you react on this website to posts sometimes like you are an "angry" teenager.
I can only judge your emotional stability by what you do here. That is a truth that holds for everyone else that sees how you post too.
edit: Clarified my point with angry.
RickyDiBiase
The Sword of Jesus of Nazareth
Thats ok by me
This is the double standard so many have. She went into a hostile environment of a media entity known for ridiculous propaganda including having to pay 3/4 of a BILLION dollars for lying about HER ELECTION. Additionally the host blatantly attempted to lie by omission playing a clip that was not the one in question.
Meanwhile, Trump has cancelled interviews with numerous places recently and refused a second debate. This piece of shyt would never ever EVER appear on Lawrence O’Donnell because he knows he’d get ate the fukk up.
Additionally this pos was interrupting her and doing that talking over you shyt all right wingers do because they want to break your focus AND limit your ability to push back.
Putting politics aside, anyone should condemn those tactics because they are obviously designed to slant the discourse. And if something is designed to slant discourse thinking people should ask WHY that is. This clown would never pull that on Trump or any other Republican for that matter
That alone should make thinking people dismiss them before you even get to the substance of whats said. Intelligent conversation consists of I make a point then I give you equal time to counter. And so on. Too many don’t even understand that.
Meanwhile, Trump has cancelled interviews with numerous places recently and refused a second debate. This piece of shyt would never ever EVER appear on Lawrence O’Donnell because he knows he’d get ate the fukk up.
Additionally this pos was interrupting her and doing that talking over you shyt all right wingers do because they want to break your focus AND limit your ability to push back.
Putting politics aside, anyone should condemn those tactics because they are obviously designed to slant the discourse. And if something is designed to slant discourse thinking people should ask WHY that is. This clown would never pull that on Trump or any other Republican for that matter
That alone should make thinking people dismiss them before you even get to the substance of whats said. Intelligent conversation consists of I make a point then I give you equal time to counter. And so on. Too many don’t even understand that.
buzzkill
All Star
Blah blah blah gimme govt titty - Marxist leftist money printer nikkasYou don’t know what the fukk Marxism is you imbecile. Didn’t you claim that you read Marx and when I pressed you on it you could t name one specific thing he said.
Marx believed that a proletarian of the dictatorship would lead to a stateless society where there wouldn’t be a need for government as every community would be self sufficient. That’s why there is a thing called libertarian socialism because many socialists believe in little government involvement outside of basic needs.
The USA, China, Japan, Norway, France, Britain, Chile, Korea etc all practice mixed economies and various degrees of social democracy.
Karl Marx was not a Social Democrat as social democrats believe that capitalism should occur and then the excess should be distributed amongst the needy.
Once again showing you don’t know what the fukk you are talking because your momma was on only fans instead of raising your little ass. Probably ate corn puffs for dinner didn’t ya
Wrong c00n
The dollar is overwhelming the world’s reserve currency coin. What fantasy world do you live in
Did you just compare Venezuela and Zimbabwe to the USA?
Actually that’s a good analogy, you are Zimbabwe, wealthy people like Elon Musk are the US.
Get it yet? Again do you need crayons?
Actually they can
Let’s take a look at countries by percentage of debt of the GDP instead of just raw debt that doesn’t tell us anything
As you can see the US debt to GDP ratio is inline with China and the EU. Japans is far higher.
Tell me you stupid bastwds are China, the EU, Japan and US on the verge of collapse
That’s not the definition at all dummy
In the United States, the debt ceiling or debt limit is a legislative limit on the amount of national debt that can be incurred by the U.S. Treasury, thus limiting how much money the federal government may pay by borrowing more money, on the debt it already borrowed.
It’s just a legislative measure it has no overall impact on the economy or anything whatsoever as the US is in no danger of default no non its debt
We don’t even know the constitutionality of the US defaulting on its debt. I.e it will never happened and if it somehow did we were already fukked long before it happened.
This is a free lesson in economics child. You should pay me. In fact I’ll take a free subscription to your mommas only fans as payment
What would happen if a meteor struck the United States
No it’s not. Inflation is low. It ticked up a little because of supply issues during the pandemic but it was never a concern.
Nobody with your punctuation skills, lack of vocabulary, economic understanding would ever have a real job. You arent fooling anyone sambo
You're stupid and really think you're smart by saying we can spend and print recklessly. I already know what you're financial health is looking like. You say economics lesson but you don't understand spending less than you make or any other economic fundamentals. You are truly a retard.
While the U.S. benefits from the dollar being the world’s reserve currency and has flexibility with its debt, that doesn't mean reckless spending comes without consequences. Continuously raising the debt ceiling and running large deficits can lead to long-term issues like eroding fiscal stability. Inflation, even if currently manageable, can spike if supply and demand get out of balance, as seen post-pandemic. Debt-to-GDP ratios matter, but comparing the U.S. to Japan or China ignores key differences in how their economies operate. Sustainable growth requires responsible spending, not limitless borrowing.
You're ignoring concerns looking for a gotcha making yourself sound dumber and dumber. Just say you need the govt to hold your hand. You're oversimplifying and ignoring the long term effects.
You completely sidestepped the Zimbabwe Venezuela point, which is key to understanding the risks of reckless spending. While the U.S. is in a much stronger position, Zimbabwe’s collapse shows how quickly things can go wrong when economic fundamentals are ignored.
Just because the U.S. has more leeway doesn't mean it's immune to the long-term risks of inflation and loss of confidence in the dollar. Also you side stepped countries losing confidence by saying it could never happen.
Ignoring this comparison overlooks the potential consequences of fiscal mismanagement. A dumb ankle grabbing fakkit like you doesn't think about the long term though. Talk about fantasy - printing and infinite amount of money and spending reckless has no consequences. Basically we can do whatever we want.
I'm 5 yrs going on 6 yrs deep as a Vue/React + Laravel dev. I've also worked with Java and Aem. Built apps for a Mogul and for a fortune 500 company. I'm self taught too but I did graduate from college. Stop projecting because you're a loser.
Last edited:
There has been a double standard from the beginning and it was anticipated. White dude vs a black woman. Not exactly surprising…just an extra hurdle or two Kamala has to jump over.
Mister Terrific
It’s in the name
Brilliant reply. High level soft ware engineer.
Define recklessly
Tell me why all social democracies that carry a high value of public spending and civic health are the richest and most prosperous societies?
If spending less equates to a high standard of living why is the standard of living in the US increasing as we spend more?
Neither China nor Japan are the world’s reserve currencies and their debt to GRP ratio is on par or higher than America’s. Why isn’t inflation in those countries spiraling out of control and why does Japan have a higher quality of life than the US given the fact Japan is notorious for its public spending?
Debt and deficit has been rising for 40 years. Why haven’t we seen fiscal instability? When do you predict this will occur. What threshold?
What are the key differences?
Define government “holding your hand?” What does that mean in economic and social terms?
I didn’t know anything Onlyfans jr. I pointed out comparing Zimbabwe to US is like comparing your mom selling feet picks for $10 to Taylor Swift posting a selfie. Completely different solar systems of credit rating and financial backing. Again not hard to comprehend.
Why hasn’t confidence in the dollar decreased. By “long term” when do you mean?
Does your mom let you hold the camera when she’s performing too?
buzzkill
All Star
Mom jokes because you don't understand spending less than you make. Hahaha what a loser.Brilliant reply. High level soft ware engineer.
Define recklessly
Tell me why all social democracies that carry a high value of public spending and civic health are the richest and most prosperous societies?
If spending less equates to a high standard of living why is the standard of living in the US increasing as we spend more?
Neither China nor Japan are the world’s reserve currencies and their debt to GRP ratio is on par or higher than America’s. Why isn’t inflation in those countries spiraling out of control and why does Japan have a higher quality of life than the US given the fact Japan is notorious for its public spending?
Debt and deficit has been rising for 40 years. Why haven’t we seen fiscal instability? When do you predict this will occur. What threshold?
What are the key differences?
Define government “holding your hand?” What does that mean in economic and social terms?
I didn’t know anything Onlyfans jr. I pointed out comparing Zimbabwe to US is like comparing your mom selling feet picks for $10 to Taylor Swift posting a selfie. Completely different solar systems of credit rating and financial backing. Again not hard to comprehend.
Why hasn’t confidence in the dollar decreased. By “long term” when do you mean?
Does your mom let you hold the camera when she’s performing too?
Reckless = spending more than you bring in dumb fukk. spending without care about consequences, what you advocate for.
High interest and inflation, countries looking for alternatives other than usd, debt ceiling standoffs, growing debt to gdp and widening deficits all signs we are very healthy financially you're right. Let's keep printing.
Last edited:
buzzkill
All Star
You’re conflating public spending with overall economic prosperity without addressing key structural differences.Brilliant reply. High level soft ware engineer.
Define recklessly
Tell me why all social democracies that carry a high value of public spending and civic health are the richest and most prosperous societies?
If spending less equates to a high standard of living why is the standard of living in the US increasing as we spend more?
Neither China nor Japan are the world’s reserve currencies and their debt to GRP ratio is on par or higher than America’s. Why isn’t inflation in those countries spiraling out of control and why does Japan have a higher quality of life than the US given the fact Japan is notorious for its public spending?
Debt and deficit has been rising for 40 years. Why haven’t we seen fiscal instability? When do you predict this will occur. What threshold?
What are the key differences?
Define government “holding your hand?” What does that mean in economic and social terms?
I didn’t know anything Onlyfans jr. I pointed out comparing Zimbabwe to US is like comparing your mom selling feet picks for $10 to Taylor Swift posting a selfie. Completely different solar systems of credit rating and financial backing. Again not hard to comprehend.
Why hasn’t confidence in the dollar decreased. By “long term” when do you mean?
Does your mom let you hold the camera when she’s performing too?
Japan’s economy benefits from low inflation due to its aging population and deflationary pressures that keep prices stable despite high public spending. The US, on the other hand, experiences different demographic and growth patterns, making a direct comparison misleading. Japan’s debt is largely held domestically, which reduces the risk of foreign investors losing confidence, whereas the US has a more global reach with its debt.
China’s economy is heavily state-controlled with a unique financial system that doesn’t operate with the same transparency or global trust as the US economy. This limits its ability to inflate or deflate its currency without major consequences. China and Japan's ability to manage debt without spiraling into inflation isn't an argument for limitless spending.....it's a result of careful economic control and different fiscal policies tailored to their domestic conditions.
The US benefits from the dollar being the world’s reserve currency. The demand for US debt is high because of the trust in the dollar. You know that trust that isn't permanent?
The standard of living doesn’t necessarily increase just because we spend more. Spending less can lead to a more efficient allocation of resources. Lower spending can lead to lower taxes, reduced inflation, and better economic stability. You know a surplus?? The rising costs of healthcare, housing, and education, despite increased spending, show that more money spent doesn't always translate into higher quality of life. You're in fantasy land but I guess living with your mom at 40, you don't understand money doesn't grow on trees without consequences. You've never been in the real world. Once again over simplified for a simple mind.
I'm done bro. Let the money printer go brrrr.
Last edited:
Mister Terrific
It’s in the name
Why are all high income, successful countries, with high standards of living and quality of life countries that spend a greater proportion of their GDP on health and human services?
Countries with the highest welfare spending per capita
Countries by standard of living
By your “I ate Cocoa Puffs for dinner” shrunken brain, we should see the inverse and these countries going through economic calamity? Why isn’t this happening?
Describe the state of the world if foreign investors lost confidence in the US financially. Like literally describe it.
As to why the US will remain the world’s reserve currency. Are you getting it yet simpleton? What currency would the world put its trust in?
Wait, I thought you said that high spending always causes inflation. Are you saying there are other factors that play into inflation?
Haven’t I been outlining that to you this whole time you stupid mutherfukker
Holy shyt. I’ve said this to you multiple times. Did someone finally write it down for you in crayon?
90% of global exchange transactions are made in the dollar. Global currencies themselves are pegged to the dollar. Can you explain to me why every billionaire in the world would want to lose their life saving and what scenario short of a nuclear apocalypse is this taking place in?
Due you have an internal monologue? Is it telling you to shut the fukk up yet?
Nobody said this goofy. It’s in direct contradiction to your claim that spending increases inflation. As I’ve demonstrated time and time again it does not. Give it up. Your IQ isn’t gonna get a Zenkai boost from this ass whooping.
You’re retarded
And your moms only fans career is only until she finds another job
Again this is why you are retarded and this highlights that fact. The confidence in your retardation is staggering. As I’ve told you time and time again, economics is not precise and the first thing economists will tell you is a lot of this guess work and that things you think are positive signs for an economy can be negative aka budget surplus.
A budget surplus occurs when a government's revenues exceed its expenditures. While a surplus can indicate fiscal health, there are several reasons why it might be considered detrimental to the economy:
- Reduced Government Spending: A surplus often results from reduced government spending. If the government cuts back on spending, it may lead to decreased investment in public services like education, infrastructure, and healthcare, which can hinder economic growth.
- Crowding Out Private Investment: When a government runs a surplus, it may be pulling money out of the economy that could otherwise be used for private investment. This can lead to higher interest rates, making it more expensive for businesses to borrow and invest.
- Economic Slowdown: If a government is focused on achieving a surplus, it may implement austerity measures or tax increases that can slow down economic growth. This can lead to higher unemployment and lower consumer spending, creating a negative feedback loop.
- Inequality: Surpluses can sometimes be achieved through tax increases or spending cuts that disproportionately affect lower-income individuals. This can exacerbate income inequality and reduce overall demand in the economy.
- Opportunity Cost: The funds that contribute to a surplus could be used for investments that stimulate the economy, such as infrastructure projects or social programs. By prioritizing a surplus, the government might miss out on opportunities that could lead to long-term growth.
- Public Perception and Policy Implications: A focus on maintaining a surplus might lead to political pressure to keep taxes high or to avoid necessary spending increases, even when economic conditions warrant them.
You see retard if you had actually read Marx one of his key arguments against capitalism was it causing social instability between classes as the proletariat will always despise the Bourgeoisie.
Stratifying the US into winners and losers may sound good to your 14 year coin brain but healthy countries would prefer social cohesion.
Why are the countries that spend most on welfare tend to have highest QOL?
I’m still waiting on my free Onlyfans subscription.
buzzkill
All Star
Keynesian economics never worked. Can't argue with someone who doesn't believe in inflation. This is pointless because you are an adult child. This will be never ending because you completely side step what I say with corny jokes and oversimplication. You have no answer for what happens when countries lose trust in us financial stability, u also side step the Venezuela, Zimbabwe and Russia tried Keynesian economics and failed miserably point, but once again that would require you to actually understand inflation which a dumb fukk Marxist p*ssy feminine ass nikka like you doesn't believe. You are a dumbass. You believe in monopoly money and fantasy. Not budgeting.Why are all high income, successful countries, with high standards of living and quality of life countries that spend a greater proportion of their GDP on health and human services?
Countries with the highest welfare spending per capita
Countries by standard of living
By your “I ate Cocoa Puffs for dinner” shrunken brain, we should see the inverse and these countries going through economic calamity? Why isn’t this happening?
Describe the state of the world if foreign investors lost confidence in the US financially. Like literally describe it.
As to why the US will remain the world’s reserve currency. Are you getting it yet simpleton? What currency would the world put its trust in?
Wait, I thought you said that high spending always causes inflation. Are you saying there are other factors that play into inflation?
Haven’t I been outlining that to you this whole time you stupid mutherfukker
Holy shyt. I’ve said this to you multiple times. Did someone finally write it down for you in crayon?
90% of global exchange transactions are made in the dollar. Global currencies themselves are pegged to the dollar. Can you explain to me why every billionaire in the world would want to lose their life saving and what scenario short of a nuclear apocalypse is this taking place in?
Due you have an internal monologue? Is it telling you to shut the fukk up yet?
Nobody said this goofy. It’s in direct contradiction to your claim that spending increases inflation. As I’ve demonstrated time and time again it does not. Give it up. Your IQ isn’t gonna get a Zenkai boost from this ass whooping.
You’re retarded
And your moms only fans career is only until she finds another job
Again this is why you are retarded and this highlights that fact. The confidence in your retardation is staggering. As I’ve told you time and time again, economics is not precise and the first thing economists will tell you is a lot of this guess work and that things you think are positive signs for an economy can be negative aka budget surplus.
A budget surplus occurs when a government's revenues exceed its expenditures. While a surplus can indicate fiscal health, there are several reasons why it might be considered detrimental to the economy:
In summary, while a budget surplus can reflect fiscal responsibility, it can also have negative implications for economic growth, public welfare, and overall economic stability if not managed carefully.
- Reduced Government Spending: A surplus often results from reduced government spending. If the government cuts back on spending, it may lead to decreased investment in public services like education, infrastructure, and healthcare, which can hinder economic growth.
- Crowding Out Private Investment: When a government runs a surplus, it may be pulling money out of the economy that could otherwise be used for private investment. This can lead to higher interest rates, making it more expensive for businesses to borrow and invest.
- Economic Slowdown: If a government is focused on achieving a surplus, it may implement austerity measures or tax increases that can slow down economic growth. This can lead to higher unemployment and lower consumer spending, creating a negative feedback loop.
- Inequality: Surpluses can sometimes be achieved through tax increases or spending cuts that disproportionately affect lower-income individuals. This can exacerbate income inequality and reduce overall demand in the economy.
- Opportunity Cost: The funds that contribute to a surplus could be used for investments that stimulate the economy, such as infrastructure projects or social programs. By prioritizing a surplus, the government might miss out on opportunities that could lead to long-term growth.
- Public Perception and Policy Implications: A focus on maintaining a surplus might lead to political pressure to keep taxes high or to avoid necessary spending increases, even when economic conditions warrant them.
You see retard if you had actually read Marx one of his key arguments against capitalism was it causing social instability between classes as the proletariat will always despise the Bourgeoisie.
Stratifying the US into winners and losers may sound good to your 14 year coin brain but healthy countries would prefer social cohesion.
Why are the countries that spend most on welfare tend to have highest QOL?
I’m still waiting on my free Onlyfans subscription.
Also the high quality of life in prosperous countries often stems from entrepreneurship and innovation (from US entrepreneurs) rather than government intervention. It’s pointless arguing with a grown man that doesn't recognize that relying on government spending without accountability is stupid. The reason you can sit up and lie and bullshyt on the Internet is because a capitalist created the Internet and websites for you to spew your nonsense.
Funny how the top QOL countries are tax havens for US companies and benefit from USA entrepreneur's investment. Netherlands, Luxembourg, Switzerland, Singapore, Ireland etc.
Government doesn't create wealth jobs or inventions that benefit humanity... entrepreneurs and innovation do. When you increase the debt taxes and money supply, you hurt entrepreneurship and innovation. Ask east Germany, Russia, and cuba how communism went for them. What great things has a communist, socialist state invented. What great cultural works did they make.... Mfs were too busy starving to death. Matter of fact in your expenditure graph, tell me what great benefit to humanity have these countries came up with in recent history. Why innovate and start business when u can suck govt titty? Notice how most innovation and tech comes from capitalist?? nikka wants everyone to be poor on welfare and if not you're a c00n. Stupid loser government daddy ass nikkas man. Get a job.
Capitalism fukk nikka>>>
Last edited:
