Video:Quantum Physics: Double Slit & How we shape our reality and universe

[Blackking]

This video is only 6 mins, but after a few minutes you start to understand the point... and the conclusion is stated during the last few seconds.

 

[Sensitive Blake Griffin]

welcome to physics 101. that stupid hippy's conclusion at the end of the video is status though. It's not like someone can shoot a bullet at you and mid-flight you get to decide where it goes

what makes me wonder is if the observer's energy/magnetic field disrupts the photons in some way to make them behave like a particle again.

 

[Brown_Pride]

Trippy. I'm goign to have to look into an explanation for this...

 

[Sensitive Blake Griffin]

Trippy. I'm goign to have to look into an explanation for this...

I'm not sure there actually is an explanation

 

[Brown_Pride]

I'm not sure there actually is an explanation

Religion

Nah this is too cool NOT to be explained. If watching something "changes" what it does then...well nah that just don't make sense.

 

[Sensitive Blake Griffin]

Religion

Nah this is too cool NOT to be explained. If watching something "changes" what it does then...well nah that just don't make sense.

quantum mechanics doesn't make any sense. it's all about probabilities and uncertainty.

 

[88m3]

Personally I don't put much stock in theories.

 

[squiddyB]

Please do correct me if I'm wrong my knowledgable brothers, but isn't the reason the position of a particle changes as we observe it simply a result of observing it being a non-passive act?

To see the particle, we need to shoot electrons at it in an electron microscope, so that they are reflected off the particle back onto a film (producing an image), but in the process of reflecting electrons of the particle you end up inevitably moving the particle.

Therefore, it's not "you observing" the particle that changes it, but you shooting shyt at it - which will of course move it.

No mystery here.

 

[BlvdBrawler]

Please do correct me if I'm wrong my knowledgable brothers, but isn't the reason the position of a particle changes as we observe it simply a result of observing it being a non-passive act?

To see the particle, we need to shoot electrons at it in an electron microscope, so that they are reflected off the particle back onto a film (producing an image), but in the process of reflecting electrons of the particle you end up inevitably moving the particle.

Therefore, it's not "you observing" the particle that changes it, but you shooting shyt at it - which will of course move it.

No mystery here.

Pretty much.

 

[BlvdBrawler]

Personally I don't put much stock in theories.

I bet if

said, "I theorize that I can make you bust a nut" you'd "put some stock in it".

*rimshot*

 

[88m3]

I bet if

said, "I theorize that I can make you bust a nut" you'd "put some stock in it".

*rimshot*

I have a sneaking suspicion she a tranny breh

[ame]http://youtu.be/276__j2hBXo[/ame]

:sconi:

 

[BlvdBrawler]

I have a sneaking suspicion she a tranny breh


:sconi:

 

[Berniewood Hogan]

Please do correct me if I'm wrong my knowledgable brothers, but isn't the reason the position of a particle changes as we observe it simply a result of observing it being a non-passive act?

To see the particle, we need to shoot electrons at it in an electron microscope, so that they are reflected off the particle back onto a film (producing an image), but in the process of reflecting electrons of the particle you end up inevitably moving the particle.

Therefore, it's not "you observing" the particle that changes it, but you shooting shyt at it - which will of course move it.

No mystery here.

THIS IS CORRECT, BROTHER!

 

[Hawaiian Punch]

Please do correct me if I'm wrong my knowledgable brothers, but isn't the reason the position of a particle changes as we observe it simply a result of observing it being a non-passive act?

To see the particle, we need to shoot electrons at it in an electron microscope, so that they are reflected off the particle back onto a film (producing an image), but in the process of reflecting electrons of the particle you end up inevitably moving the particle.

Therefore, it's not "you observing" the particle that changes it, but you shooting shyt at it - which will of course move it.

No mystery here.

Shhhh don't tell 'em all the secrets

 

[the mechanic]

Please do correct me if I'm wrong my knowledgable brothers, but isn't the reason the position of a particle changes as we observe it simply a result of observing it being a non-passive act?

To see the particle, we need to shoot electrons at it in an electron microscope, so that they are reflected off the particle back onto a film (producing an image), but in the process of reflecting electrons of the particle you end up inevitably moving the particle.

Therefore, it's not "you observing" the particle that changes it, but you shooting shyt at it - which will of course move it.

No mystery here.

Quit ruining things with common sense.....the religious folks like to get worked up about quantum mechanics because they think it gives them an infinitismal hope of sneaking their God of the gaps in

And there you are pointing out the obvious fact that to measure an electron you must disrupt its field and that will obviously change its motion.