(VIDEO) Bill O'Reilly interviews President Barack Obama on Superbowl Pre-Show

[the cac mamba]

6 million to be contracted to make a website for the US government?



FOH

i mean obv not 6 but its safe to say money was wasted

why the fukkd they go to canada anyway? all the bright talent we have in silicon valley, etc?

 

[No_bammer_weed]

Coli's resident democrats playing the race issue up again

Orielly gave him that work in front of the entire country...no underhanded pitches...

Hardly. This was theater for nitwits to eat up. O'reilly knows his base hates Obama and finds him dishonest, so he satisfied their cravings by pressuring him to answer long debunked "scandals" that conservatives can easily digest and mobilize around. This strengthens his conservative bona fides, while also being appeasing Obama's base, paradoxically, since anyone with an IQ over 70 knows stuff like beghazi and IRS scandal are bogus controversies that only survive in the right wing echo chamber. Oreilly basically softballed Obama retorting with the Fox News critique. This helps Obama's base mobilize around him against a conservative, racist crackpot.

Ultimately this was just another log on the partisan fire.

 

[filial_piety]

Hardly. This was theater for nitwits to eat up. O'reilly knows his base hates Obama and finds him dishonest, so he satisfied their cravings by pressuring him to answer long debunked "scandals" that conservatives can easily digest and mobilize around. This strengthens his conservative bona fides, while also being appeasing Obama's base, paradoxically, since anyone with an IQ over 70 knows stuff like beghazi and IRS scandal are bogus controversies that only survive in the right wing echo chamber. Oreilly basically softballed Obama retorting with the Fox News critique. This helps Obama's base mobilize around him against a conservative, racist crackpot.

Ultimately this was just another log on the partisan fire.

Wow, you just said a whole lot of nothing. You over extended yourself as usual.

BTW....The NY Times seems to disagree with you.

Excerpt from Peter Baker of the NYT

"Obama is Tackled by Orielly"

In the interview, conducted live before the game, Mr. Obama was grilled about the botched rollout of the health care law, his discredited assurances that anyone who liked their insurance could keep it, the attack on the American post in Benghazi, Libya, and the Internal Revenue Service scrutiny of conservative groups.

His answers shed little if any new light on some of the most controversial moments of Mr. Obama’s presidency, but it was a feisty 10-minute encounter that exposed the different world views of Mr. Obama and some of his sharpest critics.

For Mr. Obama it may have been an unpleasant duty that was more or less unavoidable but for some conservative fans of Fox, it was an opportunity to watch the president challenged in a way they believe he has not been by the rest of the news media.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/03/us/politics/obama-is-tackled-by-oreilly-before-game.html?_r=0

Gallup Poll on Obama's Presidency through the month of January:

Presidential Approval Ratings -- Barack Obama
Barack Obama Presidential Job Approval

Barack Obama's Daily Job Approval Trend

Barack Obama's Job Approval Average by Subgroup

 

[No_bammer_weed]

Wow, you just said a whole lot of nothing. You over extended yourself as usual.

BTW....The NY Times seems to disagree with you.

Excerpt from Peter Baker of the NYT

"Obama is Tackled by Orielly"



http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/03/us/politics/obama-is-tackled-by-oreilly-before-game.html?_r=0

I dont think the NY times "disagrees" with my take, unless you're an idiot with poor comprehension skills, and armed with the critical thinking of a lab rat.

 

[Kritic]

I dont think the NY times "disagrees" with my take, unless you're an idiot with poor comprehension skills, and armed with the critical thinking of a lab rat.

 

[filial_piety]

I dont think the NY times "disagrees" with my take, unless you're an idiot with poor comprehension skills, and armed with the critical thinking of a lab rat.

Still saying a whole lot of nothing.

This is where I leave you to argue with yourself and commit myself to discussing the issues with sharper minds on the subject matter.

 

[KingpinOG]

LOL @ left wingers flipping out because someone dared to ask Barack Obama a tough question. You could tell Obama was getting frustrated when he started to lash out at Fox News. I guess he is used to only getting questions like

"So, what songs are currently on your IPOD?"
"What's it like to hang out with Jay-Z and Beyoncé?"
"Who do you think will win the Super Bowl"?
"When was the last time you and Michelle had a romantic night out?"
etc

 

[KingpinOG]

Hardly. This was theater for nitwits to eat up. O'reilly knows his base hates Obama and finds him dishonest, so he satisfied their cravings by pressuring him to answer long debunked "scandals" that conservatives can easily digest and mobilize around. This strengthens his conservative bona fides, while also being appeasing Obama's base, paradoxically, since anyone with an IQ over 70 knows stuff like beghazi and IRS scandal are bogus controversies that only survive in the right wing echo chamber. Oreilly basically softballed Obama retorting with the Fox News critique. This helps Obama's base mobilize around him against a conservative, racist crackpot.

Ultimately this was just another log on the partisan fire.

How is the IRS scandal bogus? If the IRS scandal is bogus why is it being investigated by the FBI? Why did IRS director Lois Lerner plead the fifth instead of testifying before Congress? Why did she later resign from her position?

I know that left wingers aren't that bright but even you can't be this stupid......

 

[Dusty Bake Activate]

Hardly. This was theater for nitwits to eat up. O'reilly knows his base hates Obama and finds him dishonest, so he satisfied their cravings by pressuring him to answer long debunked "scandals" that conservatives can easily digest and mobilize around. This strengthens his conservative bona fides, while also being appeasing Obama's base, paradoxically, since anyone with an IQ over 70 knows stuff like beghazi and IRS scandal are bogus controversies that only survive in the right wing echo chamber. Oreilly basically softballed Obama retorting with the Fox News critique. This helps Obama's base mobilize around him against a conservative, racist crackpot.

Ultimately this was just another log on the partisan fire.

Basically. It was just a dog and pony show. O'Reilly gets to energize his geriatric base by "grilling" Obama about fake Fox News-only "scandals," and Obama gets to throw in a few zingers at Fox News as fodder for the left. Nothing is gained by society as a whole by this pro wrestling-like farce. Only moron lemmings like @thereheis think anybody gave anybody that work here.

 

[88m3]

Basically. It was just a dog and pony show. O'Reilly gets to energize his geriatric base by "grilling" Obama about fake Fox News-only "scandals," and Obama gets to throw in a few zingers at Fox News as fodder for the left. Nothing is gained by society as a whole by this pro wrestling-like farce. Only moron lemmings like @thereheis think anybody gave anybody that work here.

Skippy seems pretty impressed but then again he's a virgin.

 

[KingpinOG]

Wow, you just said a whole lot of nothing. You over extended yourself as usual.

BTW....The NY Times seems to disagree with you.

Left wingers like No Bammer Weed are freaking out because Obama is being exposed as a fraud who is both incompetent and a liar. All they have left to do is rant and rave about Fox News and call everybody racist.

It truly is pathetic.

 

[88m3]

Left wingers like No Bammer Weed are freaking out because Obama is being exposed as a fraud who is both incompetent and a liar. All they have left to do is rant and rave about Fox News and call everybody racist.

It truly is pathetic.

Why did Mitt lose then?

 

[No_bammer_weed]

How is the IRS scandal bogus? If the IRS scandal is bogus why is it being investigated by the FBI? Why did IRS director Lois Lerner plead the fifth instead of testifying before Congress? Why did she later resign from her position?

I know that left wingers aren't that bright but even you can't be this stupid......

Is this a right wing troll alias acct?

 

[88m3]

Is this a right wing troll alias acct?

Yeah?

Not an alias though...

 

[filial_piety]

Why did Mitt lose then?

The same reason the poor remain poor, and the fact that the willfully ignorant continue to vote for the left?