“If a government has no debt”
Now we’re playing a different game all together. Name a government without debt. Name a business that employs a shyt ton of people without debt. I’ll wait
The fed literally did this to choke the money supply leading to a cut in spending. They knew that would happen. So ur trying to make the argument that they did without any reasons behind it? You’re talking about something in a vaccum. Unfortunately that’s not how the world works
We’re splitting hairs. No debt, little debt etc The same principle applies, if the government can service its debts it will be fine. If it can’t then it means it was over-leveraged.
Everyone knows why the Fed is raising rates, to make it hard to borrow and cool off demand (more demand than supply, inflation). The issue is hiking rates is a blunt tool and not as precise as some think it is, but it’s really the only tool they have.
If you have a suggestion to what measures can be taken to tame inflation without hiking rates then you’ll win the Nobel Prize in Economics and The John Bates Medal easy.
Anyway, what I’m getting at is hiking interest rates =/= austerity measures. That’s all.
Last edited: