The United States' Armed Forces have more weapons and NOWHERE did I insinuate CEO's own the Government.
So then the US government is not obligated to use its military to protect CEOs if they are being targeted by enraged citizens and being murdered on a regular basis.
So once again what are you arguing for? We are only having this discussion because all other attempts at change have failed.
People tried to sue health insurance companies and lost. They tried to vote for politicians who would change the system and the companies threw their money around using lobbying to buy off politicians and kill the attempts at regulating them.
Nobody WANTS this to be the way that people get heard, but when you block off other options for a peaceful resolution what do you expect people to do?
Take the empathy you have for the judeo-fascist state that murders civilians and is literally doing apartheid and apply it to people who are fed up with companies choosing to deny lifesaving care because they want money while adding nothing. They're literally a middleman between doctors who want to provide care and patients who need it.
Give us your strategy then if lawsuits don't work, if bills get killed by compromised politicians who care more about their personal financial gain. What is your plan?
Did the british allow America to declare independence after reading well articulated arguments? Was slavery ended when southern leaders read abolition paperwork? Did colonialism end because the Europeans listened to organized protests and lawsuits? Was Zimbabwe freed because of constructive dialogue between good faith actors? If you refuse to obey a police officer's command does he patiently stand there and continue to talk to you until you do, or perhaps write a letter or give you a phone call?