United Health CEO Andrew Witty says they will continue to prevent "unnecessary care"

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,063
Reputation
8,154
Daps
122,260
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
If we assume a hypothetical scenario where a significant portion of the U.S. military operates under the influence or direct command of CEOs or corporate interests, the balance of power would shift dramatically. Here's an analysis of how such a situation might unfold:
They don't so this is meaningless while there's a National Guard Armory in EVERY State.​
 

Seoul Gleou

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Feb 11, 2017
Messages
11,837
Reputation
7,052
Daps
79,707
Reppin
McDowell's
They don't so this is meaningless while there's a National Guard Armory in EVERY State.​
then what's your argument. you asked who has more weapons, it's americans. then you insinuated the CEOs own the government and therefore the military, and citizens could still come out on top. so what exactly are you arguing for or against
 

Wild self

The Black Man will prosper!
Supporter
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
81,320
Reputation
11,533
Daps
219,349
When the American public gets it's hands on nuclear submarines, F-22/35's/C-130's, battalions full of well-trained forces, drones, & aircraft carriers, it might stand a chance.​

So kill off 95% of the American population that they profit off of, just to prove a point? :skip:

95% pay the taxes a d support their corrupted business model. Without them, they would collapse economically.
 

Scustin Bieburr

Baby baybee baybee UUUGH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
21,227
Reputation
10,496
Daps
121,345
So kill off 95% of the American population that they profit off of, just to prove a point? :skip:

95% pay the taxes a d support their corrupted business model. Without them, they would collapse economically.
I forgot who I was responding to. He's the same guy caping for Israel in most threads where it comes up.

"Those toddlers were human shields. What did you expect the Israeli airforce to do?!"

Dude seems to love arguing for the sake of argument itself.
 

Wild self

The Black Man will prosper!
Supporter
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
81,320
Reputation
11,533
Daps
219,349
I forgot who I was responding to. He's the same guy caping for Israel in most threads where it comes up.

"Those toddlers were human shields. What did you expect the Israeli airforce to do?!"

Dude seems to love arguing for the sake of argument itself.

That's a lot of Coli posters that want to be a part of the 1%.

Ita too late to join that elusive club, cause now they are being gunned down. French Revolution 3.0 is here.
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,063
Reputation
8,154
Daps
122,260
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
So kill off 95% of the American population that they profit off of, just to prove a point?
Not necessary. The whole point is that if America descends into anarchy/The Purge, Local/State/and Federal Forces will put it down. This is the MAJOR problem with the ideology of 'Kill the rich!'. Doing so won't make them care more.​
 

Wild self

The Black Man will prosper!
Supporter
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
81,320
Reputation
11,533
Daps
219,349
Not necessary. The whole point is that if America descends into anarchy/The Purge, Local/State/and Federal Forces will put it down. This is the MAJOR problem with the ideology of 'Kill the rich!'. Doing so won't make them care more.​

No, kill them off so they don't have a society LEFT to rule. Let them kill Americans on some genocide WWII numbers, and don't have a tax base left.
 

Seoul Gleou

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Feb 11, 2017
Messages
11,837
Reputation
7,052
Daps
79,707
Reppin
McDowell's
The United States' Armed Forces have more weapons and NOWHERE did I insinuate CEO's own the Government.
you did. below.

The American people collectively own significantly more weapons than CEOs or any specific subset of the population.
When the American public gets it's hands on nuclear submarines, F-22/35's/C-130's, battalions full of well-trained forces, drones, & aircraft carriers, it might stand a chance.​
 

Scustin Bieburr

Baby baybee baybee UUUGH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
21,227
Reputation
10,496
Daps
121,345
The United States' Armed Forces have more weapons and NOWHERE did I insinuate CEO's own the Government.​

So then the US government is not obligated to use its military to protect CEOs if they are being targeted by enraged citizens and being murdered on a regular basis.

So once again what are you arguing for? We are only having this discussion because all other attempts at change have failed.

People tried to sue health insurance companies and lost. They tried to vote for politicians who would change the system and the companies threw their money around using lobbying to buy off politicians and kill the attempts at regulating them.

Nobody WANTS this to be the way that people get heard, but when you block off other options for a peaceful resolution what do you expect people to do?

Take the empathy you have for the judeo-fascist state that murders civilians and is literally doing apartheid and apply it to people who are fed up with companies choosing to deny lifesaving care because they want money while adding nothing. They're literally a middleman between doctors who want to provide care and patients who need it.

Give us your strategy then if lawsuits don't work, if bills get killed by compromised politicians who care more about their personal financial gain. What is your plan?

Did the british allow America to declare independence after reading well articulated arguments? Was slavery ended when southern leaders read abolition paperwork? Did colonialism end because the Europeans listened to organized protests and lawsuits? Was Zimbabwe freed because of constructive dialogue between good faith actors? If you refuse to obey a police officer's command does he patiently stand there and continue to talk to you until you do, or perhaps write a letter or give you a phone call?
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,063
Reputation
8,154
Daps
122,260
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
So then the US government is not obligated to use its military to protect CEOs if they are being targeted by enraged citizens and being murdered on a regular basis.
They CAN be if the current trend gains any traction under the Insurrection Act or some exemptions under the Posse Comitatus Act.

We've HAD a strategy for better treatment of the general population since 1964 that actually WORKED.

Violence is NOT the answer and I have no empathy for ANY fascist State, so miss me with that accusation. You'd be wise to stop caping for terrorists under the guise of 'liberators' since the only thing they've 'liberated' is humanitarian aid and your morals.​
 
Last edited:
Top