here is the reason why I bring up Broner....
you sittin here talmbout we hyping Crawford up too much...because YOU KNOW he is on Wards heels or you wouldnt give a fukk right?
but you were always hyping Broner. meanwhile shytting on Crawford comp when it was better than Broners.
who did Broner ever beat that was better than Postol or Indongo?
I know, Paulie.
right?
well, I didnt give you much heat about that but fact is, Paulie was near retirement before he went over to the Ukraine as stopped the undefeated dude. he was just taking any payday he could get and he got fortunate and that extended his career and gave him the belt at the right time to fight Broner. Paulie was a bigger name but he wasnt better than Postol or Indongo at that stage. He got a controversial decision against Cano right before the Broner fight so he got lucky there. Broner barely beat Paulie. He struggled with him early. Paulie comes back and beat the only fighter more washed up than him....Zab. Gets killed by Porter and Swift and lost to Eggerton.
Broner next fight he loses to Maidana. Lost to all the best fighters he ever faced. He didnt stop Molina Jr. He had a struggle SD with Granados. And you in here hyping him for that one SD over Paulie yet shytting on Crawford saying he is overhyped due to his competition that I may add he is dominating. Stopping Indongo with that body shot way more impressive than that struggle win over Paulie.
No fukkin way you can sit here and hype Broner with his level of opposition and controversial decisions and turn around and say Crawford is overhyped.