Unarmed Man Is Charged With Wounding Bystanders Shot by Police Near Times Square

WheresWallace

Superstar
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
11,955
Reputation
6,074
Daps
42,648
Reppin
NULL
Unarmed Man Is Charged With Wounding Bystanders Shot by Police Near Times Square
16shoot4-articleLarge.jpg

Hiroko Masuike/The New York Times
The scene at 42nd Street and Eighth Avenue after officers fired at a man who was darting in and out of traffic on Sept. 14.

By JAMES C. McKINLEY Jr.
Published: December 4, 2013

An unarmed, emotionally disturbed man shot at by the police as he was lurching around traffic near Times Square in September has been charged with assault, on the theory that he was responsible for bullet wounds suffered by two bystanders, according to an indictment unsealed in State Supreme Court in Manhattan on Wednesday.

The man, Glenn Broadnax, 35, of Brooklyn, created a disturbance on Sept. 14, wading into traffic at 42nd Street and Eighth Avenue and throwing himself into the path of oncoming cars.

A curious crowd grew. Police officers arrived and tried to corral Mr. Broadnax, a 250-pound man. When he reached into his pants pocket, two officers, who, the police said, thought he was pulling a gun, opened fire, missing Mr. Broadnax, but hitting two nearby women. Finally, a police sergeant knocked Mr. Broadnax down with a Taser.

The shootings once again raised questions about the police use of firearms in crowded areas and drew comparisons to a shooting a year ago, when officers struck nine bystanders in front of the Empire State Building when they killed an armed murder suspect.

Initially Mr. Broadnax was arrested on misdemeanor charges of menacing, drug possession and resisting arrest. But the Manhattan district attorney’s office persuaded a grand jury to charge Mr. Broadnax with assault, a felony carrying a maximum sentence of 25 years. Specifically, the nine-count indictment unsealed on Wednesday said Mr. Broadnax “recklessly engaged in conduct which created a grave risk of death.”

“The defendant is the one that created the situation that injured innocent bystanders,” said an assistant district attorney, Shannon Lucey.

The two police officers, who have not been identified, have been placed on administrative duty and their actions are still under investigation by the district attorney’s office, law enforcement officials said. They also face an internal Police Department inquiry.

Mr. Broadnax’s lawyer, Rigodis Appling, said Mr. Broadnax suffered from anxiety and depression and had been disoriented and scared when the police shot at him. He was reaching for his wallet, not a gun, she said. “Mr. Broadnax never imagined his behavior would ever cause the police to shoot at him,” she said.

After his arrest, Mr. Broadnax was taken to Bellevue Hospital Center, where he told a detective that “he was talking to dead relatives in his head and that he tried throwing himself in front of cars to kill himself,” according to a court document released on Wednesday.

A judge ordered a mental evaluation, and a psychiatrist later found Mr. Broadnax competent to stand trial, Ms. Appling said.

On Wednesday, Justice Gregory Carro set bail at $100,000 bond or $50,000 cash.

Mariann Wang, a lawyer representing Sahar Khoshakhlagh, one of the women who was wounded, said the district attorney should be pursuing charges against the two officers who fired their weapons in a crowd, not against Mr. Broadnax. “It’s an incredibly unfortunate use of prosecutorial discretion to be prosecuting a man who didn’t even injure my client,” she said. “It’s the police who injured my client.”























:aicmon: Really?
 

little4209

All Star
Joined
Jun 2, 2012
Messages
2,736
Reputation
580
Daps
8,405
Why was he running in the first place?

Shoot first, ask questions later smh

It says that he was mentally disturbed tho...maybe he was on a molly or something, doesn't mean that he should be shot and killed
 

Auger

Superstar
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
12,388
Reputation
2,830
Daps
29,261
Reppin
6ix
Shoot first, ask questions later smh

It says that he was mentally disturbed tho...maybe he was on a molly or something, doesn't mean that he should be shot and killed
What if he wasn't in his right mind and was. In the proximity of you and your family, the article says he was dodging in and out of traffic on foot, that sounds normal.
 

the cac mamba

Veteran
Bushed
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
101,442
Reputation
13,396
Daps
296,639
Reppin
NULL
can we stop with these fukkin idiots claiming that they MEANT to reach for the taser?

u know what, fine. but u dont ever get to wear a badge and gun again u fukkin piece of shyt :pacspit:
 

ugksam

The White King TuT
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
7,586
Reputation
-488
Daps
7,508
NYC fukk boys cant throw hands and have no aim
 
Joined
Nov 14, 2013
Messages
998
Reputation
440
Daps
2,298
most of these trigger happy cops are just scared they need more traing or something.
 

A.V.

reTIreMEnt: THE ALBUM (01/22) ALL DSPs
Joined
Oct 15, 2012
Messages
12,883
Reputation
8,214
Daps
42,023
Reppin
#AnyCityGang
So let me get this right. :patrice:





It's established that the man is emotionally/mentally disturbed...:lupe:


At most, his sole offenses were jaywalking/traffic violations and possibly eluding...even THOUGH he was disturbed :lupe:


He's confirmed suicidal, and reached for his wallet...possibly knowing the notorious NYPD would shoot :lupe:


NYPD shoots, misses, hits innocents, and THEN uses tasers on the man, ignoring protocol and being completely ass backwards :lupe:


Man is jailed, and a grand jury that hears cases regularly not only is swayed by the D.A. but BELIEVES there's enough REASONABLE suspicion to charge this man as if he's responsible for the shootings...not the oft-inaccurate, overzealous, highly publicized officers from one of the most notoriously incompetent police departments in U.S. history? :lupe:






Why????! :mindblown: How the fukk...:dwillhuh:



































































Oh, he's black. :skip: Ok.
 
Top