But the comment isn't about the legal situation. It's merely that restitution for gitmo prisoners has absolutely nothing to do with provid8ng justice to those who lost their lives or were affected by 9/11.
She didn't say anything about restitution being justice for victims in that comment. I already told you what she was saying and you ignored it.
She was saying that ONE OF the several injustices of Gitmo is that its very nature has prevented the victims from getting justice. That by committing those abuses, the USA forestalled one of their own supposed objectives.
Fostering the idea that the victims of 9/11 hold any responsibility for the actions the US government took is absurd.
It's just an absurd assertion.
She didn't say that anywhere. Your reading comprehension is shyt.
"Sorry James, the death of Osama Bin Laden did not give them a sense of justice. What they really need to is reparations for gitmo detainees to feel whole."
She didn't say anything like that, dumbass.
Literally your entire argument these last two pages is based on a
@the cac mamba level reading comprehension error compounded by a strained attempt to position yourself amongst the victims as if that makes up for not even understanding the legal situation.