Umar Johnson and Tariq Nasheed Beefing Update: Umar never had a psychology license

get these nets

Veteran
Joined
Jul 8, 2017
Messages
53,106
Reputation
14,319
Daps
200,158
Reppin
Above the fray.
this isnt a hollywood studio block buster film. im sure tariq put up the footage of everyone he interviewed. neither of you are answering my question. WHY? explain why tariq would fly out, film 3 hrs worth of footage, then disregard all of it. without going into what hollywood film practices and all that shyt. what actual sense does it make?


I was just answering your question about why footage for ANYTHING would/could be shot and not used.
Sorry that you don't like the answer but that's it.

I don't know the nature of your side argument with the man you quoted, as to WHY or WHETHER certain things happened, but people sign releases for unused footage everyday....commercials, documentaries, feature films, tv shows, web series,etc
 

SlimeyLilDude

Richest shooter
Joined
Jun 2, 2013
Messages
7,448
Reputation
-2,645
Daps
17,404
Reppin
NULL
There was an actual thread discussing what Tariq really meant when he referred to TS as "crispy".

When Tariq Called Tommy Crispy He Was referring To His Skin Tone

You will cringe reading some of the comments, I know I did.

What am I suppose to be looking for? Tariq simply say he not nobody leader. He say not in the conscious community. He say black people need to know their history beyond being slaves. He say black people need to have a code of conduct like white supremacists do(Don't put a black person down for a white supremacist). He say black people need to create a economic base and practice group economics, get protection(stay strapped), don't be c00n, and replace the system of white supremacy with a system of justice. Other than that he a regular cool dude. I don't know why people painting him to be some perfect dude or something. Everybody disregarding everybody's else flaws and pointing out his so called flaws. Crispy talking all that shyt about black women and stealing money and shyt and y'all worrying about a nikka calling him crispy? Umar picked on people skin color and haven't showed recipes for the donations he got but y'all worrying about petty shyt about Tariq? Something ain't right. Y'all criticizing the only 1 of the 3 of them that actually do the most for black people. Y'all nikkas backwards
 

marcuz

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
55,000
Reputation
12,801
Daps
157,156
I was just answering your question about why footage for ANYTHING would/could be shot and not used.
Sorry that you don't like the answer but that's it.

I don't know the nature of your side argument with the man you quoted, as to WHY or WHETHER certain things happened, but people sign releases for unused footage everyday....commercials, documentaries, feature films, tv shows, web series,etc

the context is here for anyone to read, its not hard to follow. im just trying to figure out how umar didnt know he’d be in HC.

if an actorsigns on to be on a show/film, signs the release, gets paid; how can they then act oblivious to the fact they were going on tv?
 

get these nets

Veteran
Joined
Jul 8, 2017
Messages
53,106
Reputation
14,319
Daps
200,158
Reppin
Above the fray.
What am I suppose to be looking for? Tariq simply say he not nobody leader. He say not in the conscious community. He say black people need to know their history beyond being slaves. He say black people need to have a code of conduct like white supremacists do(Don't put a black person down for a white supremacist). He say black people need to create a economic base and practice group economics, get protection(stay strapped), don't be c00n, and replace the system of white supremacy with a system of justice. Other than that he a regular cool dude. I don't know why people painting him to be some perfect dude or something. Everybody disregarding everybody's else flaws and pointing out his so called flaws. Crispy talking all that shyt about black women and stealing money and shyt and y'all worrying about a nikka calling him crispy? Umar picked on people skin color and haven't showed recipes for the donations he got but y'all worrying about petty shyt about Tariq? Something ain't right. Y'all criticizing the only 1 of the 3 of them that actually do the most for black people. Y'all nikkas backwards

this is a very long thread. are you confusing me with somebody else? i linked the old thread to illustrate my earlier point about these guys displaying behavior that they've exhibited before. In the interest of "equal time", read this thread

Umar Johnson comes for Shannon Sharpe. The Hypocrisy.

Again, perhaps you are confusing me or my comments with somebody else.
Otherwise the "y'all" comments don't makes sense.
 

get these nets

Veteran
Joined
Jul 8, 2017
Messages
53,106
Reputation
14,319
Daps
200,158
Reppin
Above the fray.
the context is here for anyone to read, its not hard to follow. im just trying to figure out how umar didnt know he’d be in HC.

if an actorsigns on to be on a show/film, signs the release, gets paid; how can they then act oblivious to the fact they were going on tv?

Pardon me. This is a long thread...I've only read the first and last pages.

What exactly is being discussed? Which of the men made a comment, what was it , and what part are you questioning?
 

O.G.B

Real O.G.
Joined
Dec 1, 2012
Messages
10,751
Reputation
-546
Daps
31,681
bruh you make no sense. why would tariq film him for 3 hrs and disregard all the footage? why? that shyt dont even sound right.

First fam, you obviously didn't look at Umar's video or didn't throughly listen to it like @Y2Dre because Umar clearly stated (allegedly) that the first HC1 he was supposed to be interviewed for 2 hours but Tariq ended it abruptly after they met & talked briefly.

So not only do you have this incorrect, the 3 hour time frames you're referring to that Umar was interviewed for (allegedly) were both HC2 & HC3 .

Furthermore, no is suggesting that Tariq disregarded all the footage due to the fact Umar was evidently in all 3 HC's. However Tariq (or any other network/production company) isn't obligated (unless it is contractually stated) to put anyone their movie/documentary & they can scrap the entire interview if need be or they decide go another route because the network/production company has paid the person for the full rights of their intellectual property, which now they own.
 

O.G.B

Real O.G.
Joined
Dec 1, 2012
Messages
10,751
Reputation
-546
Daps
31,681
Pardon me. This is a long thread...I've only read the first and last pages.

What exactly is being discussed? Which of the men made a comment, what was it , and what part are you questioning?

No, you're absolutely right on the money. @marcuz thinks that because Tariq interviewed Umar for the first HC documentary this automatically meant he was going to be in HC1, when it fact it should be obvious that just because a network, media outlet or production company pays you for a interview to use for a specific purpose, doesn't mean they will absolutely use it for that purpose (or at all) unless it is contractually stated as such.
 

O.G.B

Real O.G.
Joined
Dec 1, 2012
Messages
10,751
Reputation
-546
Daps
31,681
david202 negged you for your post in the thread Umar Johnson and Tariq Nasheed Beefing. With the following comment: that corny gif is you talkin


Agents like @david202 getting all in their feelings !

Hassan_UMAD.png


 

marcuz

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
55,000
Reputation
12,801
Daps
157,156
First fam, you obviously didn't look at Umar's video or didn't throughly listen to it like @Y2Dre because Umar clearly stated (allegedly) that the first HC1 he was supposed to be interviewed for 2 hours but Tariq ended it abruptly after they met & talked briefly.

So not only do you have this incorrect, the 3 hour time frames you're referring to that Umar was interviewed for (allegedly) were both HC2 & HC3 .

Furthermore, no is suggesting that Tariq disregarded all the footage due to the fact Umar was evidently in all 3 HC's. However Tariq (or any other network/production company) isn't obligated (unless it is contractually stated) to put anyone their movie/documentary & they can scrap the entire interview if need be or they decide go another route because the network/production company has paid the person for the full rights of their intellectual property, which now they own.
link me to the vid

and this still isnt explaining what im asking. i know why a production may cut/remove footage. but im asking why, in this specific case, would tariq remove it—and how did umar NOT know he was going to be involved jn HC
 

Y2Dre

Melanated God
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
8,555
Reputation
5,913
Daps
62,116
Sorry, but I can't do your homework for you homie:heh:

This what nikkas say when they make claims, you ask for receipts and then they juelz their way out of it. :mjlol: :laff:

You got it my G.

“Eurocentric” emails, day late DVD shipments, lack of “peer respect”, and not being notified of a screening that everyone on this forum knew about (but somehow Umar didn’t) equates to shady janky suspect business dealings :bryan:


I swear nikkas don’t read their own posts before they hit reply.

Nothing you’ve described equates to any shady business. PERIOD.

Umar Fraudson is a charlatan b.

He literally is creating a beef in his head so he can get some publicity, scrape up a few extra bucks, and skip the country with the bread IMHO.
 

Po pimp

Superstar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
12,957
Reputation
2,124
Daps
48,216
Reppin
Chi-Town
because him being in the movie benefited him
So basically, everything that happened in HC1 that he was complaining about (receiving $500, Tariq allegedly acting standoffish, and not being informed his scenes would be shown in the film) is irrelevant since he went on to appear in two more Hidden Colors films.
 
Top