bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
59,190
Reputation
8,782
Daps
163,875
Why do people migrate all the way across the seas to the UK for asylum when there are other countries along the way which are stable and in decent economic condition? It doesn't make sense to me.

For example there are refugees fleeing from wars and they cross like 10 other countries just to reach the UK...what about Turkey? Poland? Germany? Etc...all these are stable countries they come across on the journey yet they still want to end up in the UK.
Something tells me there is more to this....

perhaps the country they're migrating to have established ethnic communities and charitable aid that can help them or they have family there already.
 

null

...
Joined
Nov 12, 2014
Messages
29,883
Reputation
5,169
Daps
47,242
Reppin
UK, DE, GY, DMV
Why do people migrate all the way across the seas to the UK for asylum when there are other countries along the way which are stable and in decent economic condition? It doesn't make sense to me.

For example there are refugees fleeing from wars and they cross like 10 other countries just to reach the UK...what about Turkey? Poland? Germany? Etc...all these are stable countries they come across on the journey yet they still want to end up in the UK.
Something tells me there is more to this....

those countries are psychologically dangerous to the refugee with their mono-cultures and intractable racism and ethnocentricism.

in a lot of those countries they are still fighting the ethnic wars of 7/8 hundred years ago.

the UK is not much better for those who want to get ahead but at least there are enclaves of alternative culture success.


 

voiture

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
3,706
Reputation
183
Daps
15,266
those countries are psychologically dangerous to the refugee with their mono-cultures and intractable racism and ethnocentricism.

in a lot of those countries they are still fighting the ethnic wars of 7/8 hundred years ago.

the UK is not much better for those who want to get ahead but at least there are enclaves of alternative culture success.


But since when did beggars become choosers? If you are fleeing a war torn country shouldn't your first priority be somewhere safe and the rest is secondary?

I think the UK benefits system is the magnet. Let's keep it 100...they won't get that in Turkey, or any of the eastern-stan countries even though those countries are very safe.
 

null

...
Joined
Nov 12, 2014
Messages
29,883
Reputation
5,169
Daps
47,242
Reppin
UK, DE, GY, DMV
But since when did beggars become choosers? If you are fleeing a war torn country shouldn't your first priority be somewhere safe and the rest is secondary?

yeah but it is not safe.

people need a relative well-being not an absolute well-being.

it is this principle which means that million dollar alimony is often set to prevent "mental cruelty".

that is why ex-millionaire businessmen throw themselves off tall buildings despite still have a net worth greater than most other people.

these people fleeing war don't want only safety, they want safety + social acceptance.

UN et-al don't mention this .. because to do so would be to shine a light on why "they the civilised european" treat people fleeing war inhumanely.

their self-image is that they are "good" and evidence to the contrary is avoided.

I think the UK benefits system is the magnet.

:mjlol:

clearly you have never lived in a wealthy country.

where do you get those ideas breh?

Let's keep it 100...they won't get that in Turkey, or any of the eastern-stan countries even though those countries are very safe.

i'll take it to 110.

the german, scandanavian, swiss (to name some) benefits systems are far superior to the borderline poverty provided by that in the uk.

not to mention that health standards, cost of living, housing standards and many other markers of standard of living are low in the uk.

the uk is characterised as a low-skill, low wage economy with low living standards.

(that is why boris and then may used to babble about "levelling up" ( and tangentially upping productivity) )

truss/kwarteng spelt out the reality which did it for them.


-

in living memory west germany absorbed and modernised a country of some 15 million people.

germany takes far for asylum seekers than the uk (or they used to).

1.5 million immigrants arrived in germany in the space of 18 months in 2015 - 2016.

"Among the six countries with the highest number of applicants were the five most populous EU countries: Germany (roughly 111,000 first-time applicants asked for asylum between January and September), France (87,100), Spain (80,000), the UK (32,000) and Italy (25,000), according to an InfoMigrants data analysis based on Eurostat numbers. The notable exception among the top 6: Greece (which received 47,000 applications)."


2019 while the UK was still in the EU for ease of comparison.
 

null

...
Joined
Nov 12, 2014
Messages
29,883
Reputation
5,169
Daps
47,242
Reppin
UK, DE, GY, DMV
@voiture

truss:

"Another book by the same authors, Britannia Unchained, was published in September 2012. The book attracted controversy for claiming that "the British are among the worst idlers in the world. We work among the lowest hours, we retire early and our productivity is poor".[68] In 2022, Truss stated that the authors had each written a different chapter of the book; Raab had written the chapter which contained that claim.[68]"

 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
59,190
Reputation
8,782
Daps
163,875

Brexit Cost the UK Economy £140 Billion, London Mayor Says​


Study suggests UK has 2 million fewer jobs due to EU divorce

Sadiq Khan says ‘mature approach’ needed to forge closer ties



-1x-1.jpg
London Mayor Sadiq Khan.Photographer: Jose Sarmento Matos/Bloomberg

In this Article
LABOUR PARTY/THE

By Irina Anghel

January 11, 2024 at 5:50 AM EST
Updated on
January 11, 2024 at 8:17 AM EST



London Mayor Sadiq Khan on Thursday will blame Brexit for costing the UK economy £140 billion ($178 billion), calling on the government to “urgently” rebuild relations with the European Union to stem the decline.

Britain’s EU divorce has also meant there are 2 million fewer jobs nationwide than there otherwise would have been, including 290,000 lost positions in London, according to research by Cambridge Econometrics commissioned by City Hall that the Labour Party’s Khan will reference in a speech at Mansion House. Half of the total job losses are in financial services and construction.

“The hard-line version of Brexit we’ve ended up with is dragging our economy down and pushing up the cost of living,” Khan will say, according to excerpts released by his office. “The cost of Brexit crisis can only be solved if we take a mature approach and if we are open to improving our trading arrangements with our European neighbors.”

While Khan’s excoriation of Brexit is in tune with the UK’s mainly Remain-voting capital city, it’s at odds with the more cautious line Labour leader Keir Starmer is trying to tread ahead of a general election expected in the second half of the year. A Remainer himself, Starmer is nevertheless seeking to win back the votes of Brexit-supporting former Labour voters in the north of England and the Midlands who switched to the Conservatives in the 2019 election. Starmer said in September there is “no case for rejoining the EU” or its single market and customs union.

Starmer has also said he wants a closer relationship with the EU, but he tends to avoid referring to the negative effects of Brexit, which was backed by 52% of voters in the 2016 referendum that triggered Britain’s exit from the bloc.

UK Economy Is 6% Smaller Because of Brexit


Difference from non-Brexit scenario

Source: Cambridge Econometrics

Britain’s economic output would have hit £2.34 trillion in 2023 if the nation had remained inside the EU, 6% more than the £2.2 trillion it logged, according to Cambridge Econometrics. It predicted the impact will worsen, shaving £311 billion off projected output in 2035 compared to a non-Brexit scenario, equivalent to a 10.1% hit. The analysis uses historical data to predict how the economy of a non-Brexit “counterfactual UK” would have performed.

The report also suggests London’s economy was £30 billion smaller than it would have been without Brexit. The average Londoner was £3,400 worse off in 2023 due to the vote, compared to the £2,000 estimate for the average Briton.

Khan will use the report to make the case for addressing London’s post-Brexit labor shortages with an approach to migration that is “informed by evidence, not prejudice,” as well as pushing for new arrangements with the EU.

“We urgently need to build a closer relationship with the EU,” Khan will say. “A new settlement would not only turbocharge our economy and help to raise living standards, but help to unlock the growth and prosperity we need.”

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s spokesman, Max Blain, dismissed the findings, telling reporters at a regular briefing Thursday the IMF’s forecast for UK economic growth is brighter than for many of its peers. “The UK has grown faster than Italy and Germany since the Brexit referendum in 2016, and faster than Germany since leaving the EU in 2020,” he said.

— With assistance from Emily Ashton and Lucy White

(Updates with comment from Sunak’s spokesman in final paragraph.)
 

Heimdall

Pro
Joined
Dec 13, 2019
Messages
456
Reputation
311
Daps
1,011
Just remembered this
full



MPs who lose their seat at the next general election are set to get taxpayer-funded help with finding a new job, the BBC can reveal.

Under a proposed "career transition" scheme, they could receive free advice with tasks such as writing a CV from a designated career coach. Commons officials are looking to hire a recruitment firm to deliver the programme from next year.

The move is part of a push to make being an MP a more attractive career.

Under the plans, support would only be offered to MPs voted out of their job at an election, rather than those choosing to stand down.

It adds that they could also have access to a career coach to help them identify their transferable skills, and write a CV "that stands out in the crowd".


It was proposed that MPs should be advised of the help on offer during the winding-up period they are given to close down their offices after an election.

This period, for which MPs receive their net salary, is set to be extended from two to four months at the next election.

MPs who lose their seat also get a separate payment linked to their time in Parliament, which averaged £5,250 after the last election in 2019. :dahell:
At first I thought, as if things weren't cushy enough for MPs (do they really need help attracting more people to run? I wouldn't have thought exit options were putting people off)

...but this current crop of MPs might need the help. :hhh:

Obviously there are existing services they could use (NCS?, DWP? :pachaha:), but all they know is 'recruiting firms'. Whose friends will get the contracts this time? :laugh:
 

jj23

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Nov 26, 2016
Messages
24,935
Reputation
5,876
Daps
114,540
Just remembered this
full




At first I thought, as if things weren't cushy enough for MPs (do they really need help attracting more people to run? I wouldn't have thought exit options were putting people off)

...but this current crop of MPs might need the help. :hhh:

Obviously there are existing services they could use (NCS?, DWP? :pachaha:), but all they know is 'recruiting firms'. Whose friends will get the contracts this time? :laugh:
Pure money heist

The cross-party body of senior MPs and officials in charge of Commons administration has endorsed the plan, and a process is now under way to choose an external HR company to deliver the training.

Commons authorities hope to put a programme in place ahead of the next general election, which is expected to take place next year.

The final scheme is yet to be announced, but a draft proposal has been obtained by the BBC following a request under Freedom of Information laws.

An internal document from September recommends departing MPs receive a "budget" to spend with the winning training provider.
 
Top