UHC CEO Killer Wasn't Insured By UHC

[Black Panther]

What you just said is the equivalent of "the police are investigating themselves, it could have been a clean shot. let's wait on more evidence before saying all cops are bad"

negro please. I'll believe the crackhead across the street before I believe a multibillion dollar corporation on something like this.

He could have been actually insured by UHC, it doesn't matter.

I'm not in a rush to cheer for an Ivy League-educated trust fund baby who was inspired by the Unabomber, even if he was spot on about US healthcare. He's a broken cac and AND a broken clock.

 

[Theo Penn]

I think the killer just wanted to take his 'stand' against the industry as a whole, not necessary UHC. Had the BCBS CEO been there, it wouldn've been him instead.

No. He targeted the UHC guy. It’s the most corrupt of the insurers

 

[Seoul Gleou]

He could have been actually insured by UHC, it doesn't matter.

I'm not in a rush to cheer for an Ivy League-educated trust fund baby who was inspired by the Unabomber, even if he was spot on about US healthcare. He's a broken cac and AND a broken clock.

brother, no one is saying you have to cheer for him. there are literally millions who will do that for you

this event is proof that there's shyt so fukked up it goes across politics, gender, race, and class. and that shyt is the abhorrent state of healthcare in this country.

you can be petty about the killer being a rich cac, but that literally doesn't change how people feel about the shooting or how it immediately had results

 

[AlbertPullhoez]

what the hell do you guys even stand for

Not for white people. fukk that cac who got killed and the shooter

If this was a nikka the energy would've been different

 

[RamsayBolton]

Not for white people. fukk that cac who got killed and the shooter

If this was a nikka the energy would've been different

 

[Black Panther]

brother, no one is saying you have to cheer for him. there are literally millions who will do that for you

this event is proof that there's shyt so fukked up it goes across politics, gender, race, and class. and that shyt is the abhorrent state of healthcare in this country.

you can be petty about the killer being a rich cac, but that literally doesn't change how people feel about the shooting or how it immediately had results

You're being obtuse. I didn't address whether someone shouldn't or should cheer for him; I'm addressing the fact that many people already are.

I'm glad that this event restarted the conversation on healthcare--but it's not hard to see that these details about the shooter are unhelpful to those who want meaningful healthcare reform (i.e. Medicare for all). They will use these details to dismiss his actual good points.

 

[im_sleep]

They want it to be personal when he did it on principal

 

[King Sun]

what the hell do you guys even stand for

Nothing but being obedient to the system.

 

[Still Benefited]

He obviously picked out UHC because they are the WORST when it comes to procedure and medication denials. What’s so hard to understand?

Should we just take a killers word for it? Oh wait,the killer hasnt even been found guilty,nor has he confessed to shyt as far as we know


Sometimes Indian Style is the best position to take while you await the facts


The idea some rich white kid couldnt find a white drug dealer to sell him pills doesnt quite add up for me.

 

[Seoul Gleou]

You're being obtuse.

lol you keep using this word... but i'm not the one focusing on semantics to grandstand. you're questioning why i, or anyone else, would be skeptical about a multibillion dollar corporation saying it investigated itself and found a person acting against it was not associated with it.

my friend, that is being obtuse.

I didn't address whether someone shouldn't or should cheer for him; I'm addressing the fact that many people already are.

then what is this:

I'm not in a rush to cheer for....

I'm glad that this event restarted the conversation on healthcare--but it's not hard to see that these details about the shooter are unhelpful to those who want meaningful healthcare reform (i.e. Medicare for all). They will use these details to dismiss his actual good points.

again, you want to wait and see details about this person's motive and reasoning. the large majority of people don't care. they care that he did it at all and that this was retributive justice in their eyes. just like a large majority of people won't care if a police brutality victim's family member kills a cop in broad daylight. they won't care about an investigation from police that found the officer killed was innocent.

 

[Zero]

You posted this like he was lying or something. This was not done for you or me. It's slowly coming out that it wasn't for them either

 

[Gloxina]

shyt, all the better then. He put all these ceo's on notice that it wasn't personal and that anybody can get it.

He obviously picked out UHC because they are the WORST when it comes to procedure and medication denials. What’s so hard to understand?

I don’t agree with what he did, but basically this

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

Not for white people. fukk that cac who got killed and the shooter

If this was a nikka the energy would've been different

Why you bringing race into this hypothetically when clearly this isn’t a partisan issue. All races are in harmony on this issue because of class status. This is a class issue, not a racial one

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

-but it's not hard to see that these details about the shooter are unhelpful to those who want meaningful healthcare reform (i.e. Medicare for all).

How do we go about achieving this?

 

[Black Panther]

lol you keep using this word...

Clearly, it continues to be both relevant and descriptive.

but i'm not the one focusing on semantics to grandstand.

Neither am I.

you're questioning why i, or anyone else, would be skeptical about a multibillion dollar corporation saying it investigated itself and found a person acting against it was not associated with it.

I'm not fond of conspiracy theories.

We don't have enough info to speculate or insinuate that they're lying about this specific subject. They could be, and if it's proven that they are I wouldn't be mad or surprised. We don't know at this point. That's all I've said.

Your skepticism is warranted. Your speculations, at this moment, are not.

then what is this:

Me speaking for myself?

again, you want to wait and see details about this person's motive and reasoning. the large majority of people don't care. they care that he did it at all and that this was retributive justice in their eyes.

And in an America where corporate-backed conservatives hold as much power as they currently do, that's a huge problem towards changing things.