U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy ENDS $60 Million Grant for Texas High-Speed Rail Project

Jean toomer

Superstar
Joined
Oct 15, 2015
Messages
10,347
Reputation
1,400
Daps
30,983
In the US people spend money on determining the routes instead of building the damn things. We need more top down decision-making that just eminent domain lists the property and pays people to get the F out-of-the-way.
Large scale construction requires environmental impact reports with which I am firmly aligned. You can’t just build stuff without analyzing consequences. However the rich can abuse the process, delaying and requesting additions to the EIRs that last years or even decades until the projects are abandoned. This is how the they subvert government.
 

King Poetic

Disciple of God
Supporter
Joined
Feb 15, 2013
Messages
101,278
Reputation
20,657
Daps
493,725
Reppin
1-2-5 The Danger Zone
Finish your own tracks texas, jeff bezos need that tax cut

train-wreck-train.gif
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
319,396
Reputation
-34,112
Daps
628,068
Reppin
The Deep State
Large scale construction requires environmental impact reports with which I am firmly aligned. You can’t just build stuff without analyzing consequences. However the rich can abuse the process, delaying and requesting additions to the EIRs that last years or even decades until the projects are abandoned. This is how the they subvert government.
We need to get rid of those damn reports. The world can’t wait for this stuff while fake environmentalists get to claim to care about every little species and habitat. Our infrastructure needs massive improvement and reforming those impact reports to a minimum would greatly help.
 

Kunty McPhuck

Scust Szn has Returned
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
33,635
Reputation
3,736
Daps
66,766
Reppin
Books and Pencils
These high-speed rail projects have to be hustles. These projects have spent 10s of millions of dollars (in the case of California, billions) with nothing to show for it.

They are. But not for the money its for the land that they force people to sell up and leave and then nothing happens.
 

Jean toomer

Superstar
Joined
Oct 15, 2015
Messages
10,347
Reputation
1,400
Daps
30,983
We need to get rid of those damn reports. The world can’t wait for this stuff while fake environmentalists get to claim to care about every little species and habitat. Our infrastructure needs massive improvement and reforming those impact reports to a minimum would greatly help.
So you don’t believe in assessing dimensions of environmental impact? If that’s the case there’s no room for reasonable discussion. I’d suggest reading the powerbroker by Robert caro to show the consequences of unchecked urban planning and major infrastructure builds or checking towns in Texas with abandoned oil rigs everywhere leaking shyt into the groundwater.
I’m of the opinion you can’t just build shyt quick, there should be some rational assessment.
 

Kunty McPhuck

Scust Szn has Returned
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
33,635
Reputation
3,736
Daps
66,766
Reppin
Books and Pencils
So you don’t believe in assessing dimensions of environmental impact? If that’s the case there’s no room for reasonable discussion. I’d suggest reading the powerbroker by Robert caro to show the consequences of unchecked urban planning and major infrastructure builds or checking towns in Texas with abandoned oil rigs everywhere leaking shyt into the groundwater.
I’m of the opinion you can’t just build shyt quick, there should be some rational assessment.

He's an idiot.

He's the type to turn around and then say :damn: what about the checks and balances.

These guys think you can just pitch up with some materials and tools and go to work without the initiation and planning phases to be completed first.
 

Jean toomer

Superstar
Joined
Oct 15, 2015
Messages
10,347
Reputation
1,400
Daps
30,983
He's an idiot.

He's the type to turn around and then say :damn: what about the checks and balances.

These guys think you can just pitch up with some materials and tools and go to work without the initiation and planning phases to be completed first.
It’s a remarkable mindset.
 

Black Hans

Follow Jesus. Be Beautiful
Supporter
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
7,987
Reputation
-1,233
Daps
19,668
Reppin
John 14:6
Good. What a waste of money! :camby:
Real World: Boston creh ftw on this one. :francis:

Ol' "Monorail!!!! Monorail!!! MONORAIL!!!!!!!!!!" face nikka :camby:
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
62,808
Reputation
9,538
Daps
172,001



Texas High Speed Rail Plan Issued Blow From Trump Administration​


Tuesday at null

Timelapse Video Shows California High-Speed Rail Route

By James Bickerton

US News Reporter

Plans for a new 240-mile high speed rail line between Dallas and Houston in Texas suffered a blow on Monday when U.S. Department of Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy announced an agreement to provide $63.9 million in federal funding for the project had been scrapped.

Newsweek contacted Amtrak and Texas Central, who together are overseeing the project, for comment via email on Tuesday outside of regular office hours.



Why It Matters​


The past few years have seen a renaissance for high-speed rail in the United States with a number of new lines being proposed, while construction has begun on tracks linking San Francisco to Los Angeles in California and Las Vegas in Nevada to Cucamonga, southern California.

The Biden administration was supportive of high-speed rail projects, with then-Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg in April 2024 saying the proposed line from Dallas to Houston "makes me very excited." Monday's announcement suggests this level of backing might not continue under the Trump administration.



What To Know​


On Monday the Department of Transportation announced the scrapping of a $63.9 million grant to Amtrak from the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA). The grant, which had been announced in September 2024, was described by Transportation Secretary Duffy as "a waste of taxpayer funds."

The money had been granted to the Texas Central Railway project, since renamed as the Amtrak Texas High-Speed Rail Corridor, from the FRA's corridor identification and development program.

The proposed high-speed rail line linking Dallas and Houston was initially proposed by Texas Central, a private group. Texas Central went on to announce a collaboration with national passenger railroad company Amtrak, which has since taken the lead over the project.

In a press release the Department of Transportation said: "This project was originally announced as a purely private venture, but as the cost estimates dramatically ballooned, the Texas Central Railway proposal became dependent on Amtrak and federal dollars for development work.

High speed train


This undated stock photograph shows a high speed train in Himeji in Japan. John W. Banagan/GETTY

"The project capital cost is now believed to be over $40 billion—making construction unrealistic and a risky venture for the taxpayer."

The statement said Amtrak has "struggled with significant operating deficits" since the coronavirus pandemic and said that "under the previous administration" it "considered massive loans underwritten by the federal government, along with additional grants, as the only way to spur construction activities."

Consequently: "Walking away from the Texas Central Railway project at this time will allow Amtrak to focus on necessary improvements to deliver more reliability to its current riders."

According to developers the proposed Dallas to Houston line, to be based around Japanese Shinkansen technology, could slash journey times between Texas' two biggest cities to 90 minutes. Amtrak predicted the line would reduce the number of cars traveling on Interstate 45 by 12,500 per day and cut annual greenhouse gas emissions by over 100,000 tons.



What People Are Saying​


Transportation Secretary Duffy said: "I am pleased to announce that FRA and Amtrak are in agreement that underwriting this project is a waste of taxpayer funds and a distraction from Amtrak's core mission of improving its existing subpar services.

"The Texas Central Railway project was proposed as a private venture. If the private sector believes this project is feasible, they should carry the pre-construction work forward, rather than relying on Amtrak and the American taxpayer to bail them out. My department will continue to look for every opportunity to save federal dollars and prioritize efficiencies."

FRA chief counsel Kyle Fields commented: "Connecting Dallas and Houston remains one of the more exciting opportunities for new passenger rail in the United States.

"Today's announcement reflects a recognition by Amtrak and FRA that federalizing the Texas Central Railway proposal is not the best use of taxpayer funding."

In a statement provided to Newsweek Kleinheinz Capital Partners, the lead investment sponsor in Texas Central, said: "We are proud to have stepped in as the private sector sponsor of the Texas high-speed rail, and today's announcement is good news for the overall project.

"The first Trump Administration gave this project the green light, but after President Trump left office the project got hung up in the politics of the Biden Administration's efforts to jam Amtrak and politics into the equation. We agree with Secretary Duffy that this project should be led by the private sector, and we will be proud to take it forward. This project is shovel-ready and will create significant new jobs and economic growth for Texas as part of President Trump's efforts to boost the U.S. economy."



What Happens Next​


The FRA grant made up only a small chunk of Amtrak Texas High-Speed Rail Corridor's estimated cost, and the project could still go ahead with the support of private investors. However, these will likely prove harder to attract without any underwriting from the federal government.

Update 4/15/25, 11:26 a.m. ET: This story has been updated with comment from Kleinheinz Capital Partners.
 
Top