Twitter seems to be advertising only Trump ads and are promoting #comradekamala. Elon is trying to influence the election. How is this legal
- Thread starter Tony D'Amato
- Start date
yes for violating their terms of services, in fact he was on a special list not to be auto suspended because his tweets kept violating their terms of services. he was getting special treatment for years while people who reposted his tweets word for word were getting suspended,
One Twitter account is reposting everything Trump tweets. It was suspended within 3 days.
The account was suspended for "glorifying violence."
mashable.com
This test proves Jack ain’t lying—Twitter treats Trump differently [UPDATED]
Repeating a call to shoot looters got @SuspendThePres a visit from the banhammer.
arstechnica.com
Original story: In the past, Twitter has said that incitements to violence from world leaders like President Donald Trump should be treated differently from those made by the rest of us. This week, that policy was shown to clear effect when the social media network banned the @SuspendThePres account and ordered it to delete a tweet. Its crime? Tweeting the exact same words used by Trump a day earlier.
Further Reading
Twitter clarifies special rules for tweets by world leaders like TrumpThe experiment began on May 29 when a Twitter account was repurposed as a bot with a single mission: to copy Trump's tweets verbatim and see how long it would take to get banned.
The next thing the account tweeted was a copy of Trump's infamous "when the looting starts, the shooting starts" missive. When the president issued that tweet, it was, in fact, sufficient for Twitter's moderation to kick in. Trump's tweet is still viewable behind a "click to view" barrier. But three days after repeating that same call to shoot at protestors, @SuspendThePres got a Twitter timeout, along with an order to take down the offending message:
It’s a private entity and Facebook does the same.
Trump Suddenly Looks Very Afraid of Being Sued by Taylor Swift
Donald Trump now wants nothing to do with the A.I. images he shared just a few days ago.
newrepublic.com
Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling/
August 23, 2024/11:58 a.m. ET
Trump Suddenly Looks Very Afraid of Being Sued by Taylor Swift
Donald Trump now wants nothing to do with the A.I. images he shared just a few days ago.
Rebecca Noble/Getty Images
Donald Trump is trying to brush off the fact that he shared A.I.-generated images of Taylor Swift endorsing his campaign to his Truth Social account earlier this week, now claiming that he doesn’t know “anything about them.”
“I don’t know anything about them, other than somebody else generated them,” Trump told Fox Business correspondent Gary Trimble after his campaign event in Asheboro, North Carolina, on Wednesday. “I didn’t generate them.”
One fabricated image shared by Trump of the notoriously litigious pop star had Swift clad in red, white, and blue, posing like Uncle Sam before an American flag emblazoned with the text: “Taylor wants YOU to vote for Donald Trump.”
“I accept!” Trump captioned the image.
Another Swift-related post shared by the former president depicted a group of women marching in “Swifties for Trump” shirts (the post was labeled satire by its creator).
If Trump truly can’t tell the difference between an A.I. generated image and a genuine photograph, especially one that’s doctored to illustrate a campaign endorsement, then that’s a significant problem. But it’s far from the only A.I.-generated image that Trump has shared in recent weeks. Shortly after he began posting to his Twitter account—the first time he’d done so in earnest since the January 6 riot—the former president shared an A.I.-generated video of himself and X owner Elon Musk dancing.
Still, Trump warned Trimble, “A.I. is always very dangerous.”
“Somebody came out. They said, ‘Oh look at this,’” Trump attempted to explain to the reporter on Wednesday. “These were all made up by other people. A.I. is always very dangerous in that way.”
It’s not the first time this summer that Trump has obsessed over Swift. During a closed-door meeting between Trump and House Republicans in June—his first visit to Capitol Hill since before the January 6 insurrection—Trump insisted on discussing the pop phenom, lamenting that she might endorse President Joe Biden while he was still in the race. Days before the meeting, Variety reported that Trump had spoken at length about Swift in a one-on-one interview, describing her as “unusually beautiful.”
CodeKansas
Superstar
I can't tell if OP is being sarcastic or not. 
How is it legal when CNN, Fox News or MSNBC does it?
Same thing, it's not illegal
Same thing, it's not illegal
Pull Up the Roots
I have a good time when I go out of my mind..
Just straight up spreading bullshyt to justify your narrative. What the hell is wrong with some of you?
It’s not bullshyt bc u don’t like it bud
Similar threads
