Twitter has officially removed all the blue checks from verified accounts

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
56,111
Reputation
8,239
Daps
157,793
[/U]

Twitter Removes Evidence of Blue Check Support for Mass Murder​



Alejandra Caraballo surfaced evidence that MMA fighter Jake Shields asked his followers if they supported executions for trans people and their supporters. Many did. Now Twitter has hidden the evidence.

by Evan Urquhart

This morning on Twitter a post from Alejandra Caraballo began to circulate widely. It showed a Tweet by MMA fighter Jake Shields asking his followers, “Would you support public executions of anyon who helps a child transition? This would include doctors, therapists, teachers, guidance counselors, etc.” Caraballo’s initial post also included the responses, by blue-checked Twitter accounts, all saying that they would, in fact, support the murder of therapists, doctors, and teachers.

Would you support public executions of anyone who helps a child transition? This would include doctors, therapists, teachers, guidance counselors, etc.

screenshot from Caraballo’s Twitter account

Twitter removed the posts, presumably because advocating for mass murder is still against the TOS. They also removed the evidence. Tweets, including Caraballo’s, that contained a collage of screenshots including the question and the affirmative answers. Those tweets now show only a blank panel. Asked to comment, Caraballo responded over text message:

Twitter is censoring posts calling attention to violent rhetoric from users of the site. This isn’t the first time, as Trust and Safety Head Ella Irwin responded to a prior post about Hitler memes and defended pictures of Hitler. It’s clear that the moderation policy is now Calvinball with anything that might embarrass or shame Twitter being subjected to arbitrary censorship through the targeted removal of images showing severe content policy violations by users expressing concern.
Caraballo speculated that the involvemenet of Ella Irwin may have been a connecting factor, as both her own post today and an earlier example of a blanked out image were Tweets where Irwin was tagged directly by concerned users attempting to find relief after the normal reporting process failed to result in their removal.

Twitter’s owner, Elon Musk, has long presented himself as a champion of free speech, and contrasted that approach with the site’s previous ownership. His changes at the company have included reversing bans of accounts that engaged in hate-fueled harassment, while at the same time banning journalists for reporting, including one incident as recently as last week. In the interest of preserving this information, we are including links to the internet archive of Jake Shield’s posts and the responses here and here as well as screenshots of the tweets as captured by Caraballo. While some of the accounts pictured have been suspended, not all have been and Shields himself has not been sanctioned by Twitter for tweeting in support of public executions of people who support gender-affirming medicine.

user @af_nolan responds I would settle for us putting an armband on those who introduced it into the culture. Something to identify them with.

@LolaGranola17 replies: Absolutely. Hannging or firing squad. @ajmcgredor85 replies Anybody who commits a crime against children is a rapist who should be publicly hung.

@Big_Hueso replies: I volunteer to be the executioner. @D_Monayyy94 replies: Public execution is kinda wild. I'm not saying I'm against it I'm just saying that's some wild shit to throw out there then again so is changing your gender so idk lol

@bayc1404 replies: 100 100 100 @murdahhhhhh replies: Sure why not Can we add pedos to that list as well

@ajmcgregor85 replies: Yes @bluetoblackkat57 replies: Yes @graffanati19 replies: Yes

signal-2023-04-26-13-25-50-037-2.jpg
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
56,111
Reputation
8,239
Daps
157,793


:dead: anybody who paid for a blue check mark gotta feel like a dumbass now.


:russ:





1/2
What happened? I didn’t pay for this. I would NEVER pay for this.

When did the Blue Check mark start getting passed around again?!

2/2
Receipts that I didn’t pay for this new blue check.

Mine is from the way back. The olden days of verification not validation.

Back when Twitter was nice and breezy. Shoot, I was still live-tweeting award shows back then!
GKRzD0-asAAKQYM.jpg

GKR2LVEaQAAT_cG.jpg

GKR08UCXoAArByC.jpg





1/2
I see that Musk is going back to the failed attempt to stick blue checks on people to try to obscure the difference between sensible folks and people who will pay eight dollars to Elon Musk.

2/2
DO YOU SEE ONE
GKRxm2iXMAAdfIe.jpg

GKWAbDdWsAAZBMi.jpg
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
56,111
Reputation
8,239
Daps
157,793

Elon Musk’s reversal on blue checkmarks shows his desperation to lure high-profile users back to X​

Analysis by Oliver Darcy, CNN

Published 7:10 AM EDT, Fri April 5, 2024

gettyimages-2074365027.jpg

Odd Andersen/AFP/Getty Images

CEO of X, Elon Musk, has restored the blue checkmarks on some high profile accounts that had been taken away previously in order to charge an $8 subscription fee.

Editor’s Note: A version of this article first appeared in the “Reliable Sources” newsletter. Sign up for the daily digest chronicling the evolving media landscape here.

New YorkCNN —

Elon Musk has given up, restoring the “lords and peasants” blue checkmark system he once admonished and assailed as elitism.

After insisting that journalists, celebrities and other notable users pay him $8 a month for Twitter’s once-coveted blue checkmark, the erratic billionaire has thrown in the towel, widely restoring blue badges to prominent accounts on the imperiled social media platform.

A number of people — including yours truly — woke up on Thursday to learn that X had declared them “an influential member of the community” and, thus, would be giving them “a complimentary subscription to X Premium.” The message the company sent to those users noted that X “reserves the right to cancel the complimentary subscription in its sole discretion.” (Translation: If you’re mean to Musk, you are likely putting yourself in jeopardy of losing it.)

The move is a major reversal by Musk, who made user payments for the blue checkmark a central tenet of his plan to build a subscription business on X and reduce the platform’s heavy dependency on advertiser dollars. “Trash me all day, but it’ll cost $8,” Musk insisted, endlessly repeating a version of that message to the vocal and constant complaints of users.

“To all complainers, please continue complaining, but it will cost $8,” Musk declared.

Musk — who often uses his perch as the most-followed user on X to share absurd and dangerous right-wing conspiracy theories — also took glee in stripping journalists of their status. The thin-skinned Musk has repeatedly smeared the press and, when he took over the platform, made it a point to strip journalists of any special cachet they carried, framing it as a move aimed at empowering the masses.

“Twitter’s current lords & peasants system for who has or doesn’t have a blue checkmark is bullshyt,” Musk wrote in November 2022. “Power to the people!”

Naturally, users pushed back against his plans, noting that verification of journalists offered the public a helpful way of quickly identifying credible sources of news. In reality, the legacy verification system benefited the average user far more than it benefited those who were given the badges. But Musk, blind or disinterested in that reality, vigorously pushed back.

“You represent the problem: journalists who think they are the only source of legitimate information,” Musk wrote to one protesting user. “That’s the big lie.”

“Empowering the public relative to journalists sure is a great way to earn negative press 🤣🤣,” Musk said in another post.

But most journalists and other notable users who once sported the checkmark declined to fork over the cash. Instead, the people willing to shell out money for the status symbol consisted of a cocktail of Musk super-fans, right-wing trolls and others who would not have been able to attain a checkmark under the legacy system which required them to be a notable public figure. (Ironically, a fair continent of this group spent years mocking journalists for supposedly being obsessed with the checkmark, only to pay $8 for it while the journalists declined).

Even worse, trolls impersonating the identities of others were granted blue checkmarks, stripping the symbol of its core value: identity verification.

As a direct result, the once-coveted status symbol lost all its value, instead becoming a toxic sign of obedience and fealty to Musk, which many users rejected. This week, when Musk suddenly appended checkmarks to the accounts of “influential members of the community,” plenty of users loudly noted that they had not paid for it.

“What happened? I didn’t pay for this. I would NEVER pay for this,” actress Yvette Nicole Brown posted on X.

“Stating for the record I did NOT pay to have my check mark restored,” added the conservative commentator Amanda Carpenter.

A representative for X did not respond to a request for comment on Musk’s move to restore the blue checkmarks. But it’s obvious.

Since Musk’s disastrous takeover of the social media company, the platform has been on a downward spiral. Notably, X’s daily usage has plummeted over the last year, with the user base down a staggering 23%, according to data Sensor Tower provided NBC News’ David Ingram. Daily active users are down an additional 18%, the analytics firm added.

That’s an alarming trend for the platform, which likes to market itself as the place where live conversation occurs. Meanwhile, Meta’s X competitor, Threads, continues to show growth, with Mark Zuckerberg telling investors in February that the platform has grown to more than 130 million monthly active users. Zuckerberg has said that his goal is to get Threads to 1 billion users. And other platforms like Mastodon and BlueSky have also become refuges for Twitter exiles.

It all spells trouble for Musk, whose platform continues to descend into an uninhabitable right-wing fever swamp (quite frankly, it already can be fairly defined as such). Don’t just take my word for it, either. The evidence is plain as day in Musk’s own public actions. The billionaire has grown so desperate to lure back one-time power users, he is reversing course on what was his rallying cry against the elites.

Gone are the days when Musk poked the journalists and celebrity class about paying him $8 a month. Now, Musk is so desperate to see their return, he’s willing to crown them with the blue badge and restore their accounts to “lord” status. That says it all.
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
56,111
Reputation
8,239
Daps
157,793


X won’t let users hide their blue checks anymore​


The change comes after X began verifying "influential" users who hadn't signed up for premium.​

Karissa Bell

Senior Editor

Thu, Apr 11, 2024, 6:29 PM EDT·1 min read

1

7ea21070-cb70-11ee-b7ff-090451c3fa8e

Anadolu via Getty Images

X will no longer allow users to hide their blue checks, regardless of whether they paid for premium or not. On Thursday, the app began notifying users that “the hide your checkmark feature of X Premium is going away soon.”



The change comes shortly after X unexpectedly began adding blue checks to the accounts of “influential” users with at least 2,500 followers who pay for a premium subscription. While Elon Musk suggested that change was meant to be a perk, some of his critics — including formerly verified users — were less than pleased with the blue badge appearing on their accounts, lest others suspect them of actually paying for a subscription.
 
Top