Tulsi Gabbard joins..The Daily Caller

[Pressure]

The deflection is palpable.

My mother is Black/African-American.

She failed you. Or you failed her.

 

[newworldafro]

Again, why would a "progressive" work with a white supremacist Tucker Carlson outfit, unless they aren't actually progressive. Unlike MSBC having Buchanan on, Gabbard agrees with most of Carlson's points.

Why would any black person work with Joe Biden?

The point is you can call anybody racist........working with alleged or actual racist doesn't make you one

Again CNN or HuffPo could have called and made an offer....maybe they did and she didn't like contract stipulations....idk.

Worked with people, Opie and Anthony, many called racist and he gets love years later.

Some of yall work with them right now..

 

[newworldafro]

She failed you. Or you failed her.

Nah. Deflection.

 

[Adeptus Astartes]

Why would any black person work with Joe Biden?

The point is you can call anybody racist........working with alleged or actual racist doesn't make you one

Again CNN or HuffPo could have called and made an offer....maybe they did and she didn't like contract stipulations....idk.

Worked with people, Opie and Anthony, many called racist and he gets love years later.

Some of yall work with them right now..

Breh...Stop deflecting to Biden. Biden ain't perfect. No one says he is. You're the one defending Gabbard working with a known right wing blog that has hosted and defended several major white nationalists. Defend her on her own merits. She put herself out there as a progressive. Recently, she's done more to defend the right, and is now working for a news organization full of white nationalists, who's owner's head writer was outed as a hardcore neo Fascist last year. If she had any integrity, or valued her progressive label, she'd have nothing to do with them. She sounds more and more like a paleocon or a national populist than a progressive.

 

[88m3]

@Rhakim thoughts?

@FAH1223 ?

 

[Black Panther]

Deflecting from the question?
Stay on topic

The deflection is palpable.

Nah. Deflection.

Is Joe Biden racist or getting back at law heavy conservatives to show he too can be tough on

Why would any black person work with Joe Biden?

"True for thee, but not for me"

 

[Paper Boi]

i honestly expected her to get a better deal than that

 

[Professor Emeritus]

IM SURE THE LEFT Wing hack media that called her a Russian stooge for calling out HillRaiser and the MIC were looking to hire her.

Did you storm the capitol with Alex Jones last week?

Deflecting from the question?

You didn't ask a question, how can he deflect from it?

If she wanted to sign up with a left-wing media outlet at the integrity level of The Daily Caller then it would have been easy.

We're not even talking The Washington Times or Fox News or some shyt. We're talking THE DAILY CALLER.

The Daily Caller has frequently published false stories. The website publishes articles that dispute the scientific consensus on climate change. The website has published articles by white supremacists such as Jason Kessler and Peter Brimelow. Scott Greer was deputy editor at The Daily Caller. After his departure in June 2018,[2] it was revealed that he published articles espousing white nationalist, racist anti-black and antisemitic views under a pseudonym in white supremacist publications.

In January 2017, The Daily Caller posted a video which encouraged violence against protesters.[40][41][42][43] The footage showed a car plowing through demonstrators, with the headline "Here's A Reel Of Cars Plowing Through Protesters Trying To Block The Road". The video clip was set to a cover of Ludacris' "Move bytch."[40] This Daily Caller stub drew attention in August 2017 when a white supremacist plowed his car through a group of counterprotesters at a white nationalist rally in Charlottesville.[40] After the video attracted attention, The Daily Caller deleted it from its website.[40][43]

I'm not surprised you're in here though, considering your past with both Tulsi and far-right outlets.

 

[FAH1223]

@Rhakim thoughts?

@FAH1223 ?

Looks like she has to clout chase to the right wing to make a buck.

 

[Professor Emeritus]

She is the only Dems even talking about racheting down the US foreign interventions. That's very substantial and original.

Tulsi has taken in hundreds of thousands of dollars in campaign donations from defense contractors. Tulsi voted to increase the defense budget under Trump. Tulsi has repeatedly co-signed drone strikes. Tulsi openly caped and lied for violent foreign dictators like Assad and Modi when they brutally killed their own people. Tulsi has literally said, "When it comes to the war on terrorists, I'm a hawk." She said the USA has the responsibility to "root out evil wherever it is" and "defeat radical Islamic extremism."

The only place where she's loud about reducing military interventions is in regime-change wars. The rest of the time she's a hawk when it comes to the military. There are many dems who are much more consistent in reducing our military footprint than she is.

 

[88m3]

Looks like she has to clout chase to the right wing to make a buck.

Isn't it strange that she's doing this by choice? Immediately going to far right outlets... I mean her supporters always talk about her being a "progressive" and she was a Democrat congresswoman for around 10 years... Why wouldn't she preach this to her supposed core audience?

 

[AnonymityX1000]

Tulsi has taken in hundreds of thousands of dollars in campaign donations from defense contractors. Tulsi voted to increase the defense budget under Trump. Tulsi has repeatedly co-signed drone strikes. Tulsi openly caped and lied for violent foreign dictators like Assad and Modi when they brutally killed their own people. Tulsi has literally said, "When it comes to the war on terrorists, I'm a hawk." She said the USA has the responsibility to "root out evil wherever it is" and "defeat radical Islamic extremism."

The only place where she's loud about reducing military interventions is in regime-change wars. The rest of the time she's a hawk when it comes to the military. There are many dems who are much more consistent in reducing our military footprint than she is.

And for like the 100th time I appreciate that about her as well as her stance on universal healthcare, reparations, regulating big tech (what she is actually talking about in the video). Kudos to those who work in that effort to reduce our military footprint as well, it's not a competition. Someone should make some threads about their efforts. She's not even a politician anymore. I'm not making threads about her.
And un what's going on here? Are people under the impression she works at the Daily Caller?

 

[FAH1223]

Isn't it strange that she's doing this by choice? Immediately going to far right outlets... I mean her supporters always talk about her being a "progressive" and she was a Democrat congresswoman for around 10 years... Why wouldn't she preach this to her supposed core audience?

She was the Vice Chair of the DNC..

 

[AnonymityX1000]

She was the Vice Chair of the DNC..

And then what happened? And people wonder why she ran to the right wing. lol

 

[Professor Emeritus]

And then what happened? And people wonder why she ran to the right wing. lol

What could possibly have happened in the last 5 years that would make anyone with a conscience want to run to the right wing?