Tucker Carlson Gets OWNED On White Supremacy By UConn Professor (>>Tariq)

[NotaPAWG]

I don't converse with the mentally ill (or in your case, a possible drug addict) and you clearly are that.

I have a nice life.

You're a fukking idiot. I don't do drugs.

I asked you several times how Greeks are not Caucasian and you keep dodging to answer it because the only answer you could present is the argument neo-nazis and st0rmfr0nt like people use.. the Turks. So if you're gonna tag me, present a fukking argument that isn't ONLY pushed by Nazis.

 

[DrunkenNovice]

He's giving work on twitter too

Matthew W. Hughey (@ProfHughey) on Twitter

 

[Ms. Elaine]

You're a fukking idiot. I don't do drugs.

I asked you several times how Greeks are not Caucasian and you keep dodging to answer it because the only answer you could present is the argument neo-nazis and st0rmfr0nt like people use.. the Turks. So if you're gonna tag me, present a fukking argument that isn't ONLY pushed by Nazis.

Yes, you do. It's quite obvious - just based on your keystrokes and scatterbrained thoughts.

You're getting blocked. Don't bother responding.

 

[NotaPAWG]

Yes, you do. It's quite obvious - just based on your keystrokes and scatterbrained thoughts.

You're getting blocked. Don't bother responding.

Ok nazi lol

 

[FTBS]

He dropped bombs but it meant nothing. There was a time when I would have relished in that shyt but now that I see shyt for what it is, its actually rather sad. People like Tucker have no problem brushing that shyt off on some "agree to disagree" type shyt just like he did at the end of the segment. Dude got destroyed and still had that smug look on his face, tried to diminish my man, and went on to the next segment. There are millions of people that see no need to dig any deeper than Tucker did and you can beat them over the head with all the facts that you want and their belief perseverance will remain strong. There is no owning or ethering in instances such as these. All that did was at that very least give dude content for a segment and at the most give him a ratings bump. Trump's rise has made it crystal clear to me that a great number of people, including many in positions of power/influence, don't give a fukk about facts and logic and making sense and even basic human decency.

 

[AJaRuleStan]

I have no idea why Tucker refused to confront the Unconn guy's explanation on the demographic change talking-point. The claim was extremely stupid, even dumber than when Tariq claimed the non-whites immigrating from mexico were perhaps actually white.

Let's assume for a minute that his claim for why the immigration act of 1965 was implemented was true, despite the fact that he didn't cite any evidence to back it up; i'm suppose to believe that a system that has been overseeing America since its inception for the purpose of advancing the interest of white people at the cost of non-whites would intentionally allow an immigration policy that would ultimately result in greatly reducing the influence of whites for a trade-off that stands to primary benefit the non-white voting population by increasing their numbers????
How does that make any sense - this "system" is essential going against its own objective which will only culminate in its destruction.

Also, some of the professor's other points are just moronic - "44 out of the 45 presidents of the United States are white", well, what the fukk did he expect to find? How many of the leaders in China do you think are fukking Chinese. What case is he looking at that has him thinking that this isn't the norm.

 

[Fatboi1]

............

@BmoreGorilla

 

[UpAndComing]

THIS is how you debate on FOX News

If we just gonna keep it a buck, the professor is a more polished debater than Tariq, and handled certain questions/attacks by Tucker rather easily. Tariq is better debater in long form type of media, like 2 hour radio podcasts, which is why he destroyed Shulz on the Brilliant Idiots show

But at the same time, Tucker interrupted the professor way less, and was less emotional towards the professor than he was Tariq. But still, that's what great debaters do, handle attacks at all angles, which is what the Professor did

 

[Sccit]

THAT DUDE ISNT WHITE?

 

[JahBuhLun]

I have no idea why Tucker refused to confront the Unconn guy's explanation on the demographic change talking-point. The claim was extremely stupid, even dumber than when Tariq claimed the non-whites immigrating from mexico were perhaps actually white.

Let's assume for a minute that his claim for why the immigration act of 1965 was implemented was true, despite the fact that he didn't cite any evidence to back it up; i'm suppose to believe that a system that has been overseeing America since its inception for the purpose of advancing the interest of white people at the cost of non-whites would intentionally allow an immigration policy that would ultimately result in greatly reducing the influence of whites for a trade-off that stands to primary benefit the non-white voting population by increasing their numbers????
How does that make any sense - this "system" is essential going against its own objective which will only culminate in its destruction.

Also, some of the professor's other points are just moronic - "44 out of the 45 presidents of the United States are white", well, what the fukk did he expect to find? How many of the leaders in China do you think are fukking Chinese. What case is he looking at that has him thinking that this isn't the norm.

The People's Republic of China (PRC) officially recognizes 56 distinct ethnic groups, the largest of which are Han, who constitute 91.51% of the total population in 2010. Ethnic minorities constitute 8.49% or 113.8 million of China's population in 2010. During the past decades ethnic minorities have experienced higher growth rates than the majority Han population, because they are not under the one-child policy. Their proportion of the population in China has grown from 6.1% in 1953, to 8.04% in 1990, 8.41% in 2000 and 8.49% in 2010. Large ethnic minorities (data according to the 2000 census) include the Zhuang (16 million, 1.28%), Manchu (10 million, 0.84%), Uyghur (9 million, 0.78%), Hui (9 million, 0.71%), Miao (8 million, 0.71%), Yi (7 million, 0.61%), Tujia (5.75 million, 0.63%), Mongols (5 million, 0.46%), Tibetan (5 million, 0.43%), Buyi (3 million, 0.23%), and Korean (2 million, 0.15%).

The United States has never been 90% white.

Poor whites in this country have no voice, just like any other poor demographic, the issue is what poor whites feel that they are entitled to. That was the whole point of slavery, to have people of color work to death for free while building up the nation's wealth.

I can have a million people work for me, for what ever wage I choose to pay them because they have no true voice. The only power they would have would be strength in numbers to physically overthrow me, but then who's going to run the business? A lot people don't have mental ability or want to of being a business owner. So it's easy for a handful of people to run and dominate a larger group of people when does people live in a constant state of fear.

 

[Pitfalls0117]

This when he knew he fukked up

He looks like he just saw a mirror and realized he has no lips.

 

[Gravity]

I have no idea why Tucker refused to confront the Unconn guy's explanation on the demographic change talking-point. The claim was extremely stupid, even dumber than when Tariq claimed the non-whites immigrating from mexico were perhaps actually white.

The demographic change talking point was nothing but a deflection. Regardless of how the demographics have changed it doesn't negate the existence of systematic white supremacy. Tucker's point that this isn't a white supremacist country because it allows non whites to immigrate here was invalid.

Let's assume for a minute that his claim for why the immigration act of 1965 was implemented was true, despite the fact that he didn't cite any evidence to back it up; i'm suppose to believe that a system that has been overseeing America since its inception for the purpose of advancing the interest of white people at the cost of non-whites would intentionally allow an immigration policy that would ultimately result in greatly reducing the influence of whites for a trade-off that stands to primary benefit the non-white voting population by increasing their numbers????
How does that make any sense - this "system" is essential going against its own objective which will only culminate in its destruction.

You're talking like you don't realize that whites just came together and put an open white supremacist in office who ran on a platform to stop non white immigration into this country. Whites are still damn near 70% of the population but they are now feeling threatened by the numbers and influence of non whites in this country and have started to push back full force. "Make Amerikkka great again" simply means to reinvest in white supremacy. at pretending that you don't see whites circling their wagons at the perception that their influence/power is dwindling in this country.

Also, some of the professor's other points are just moronic - "44 out of the 45 presidents of the United States are white", well, what the fukk did he expect to find? How many of the leaders in China do you think are fukking Chinese. What case is he looking at that has him thinking that this isn't the norm.

Well China doesn't pretend to be this all inclusive democracy melting pot. China is a communist country for Chinese people. This is the United States of America tho, not the United States of white america. Blacks and other non whites have been on this land since before this country was founded. If you crackers would just be upfront and honest about the fact that you're racist and you see America as a white country for white people and that you've put a system in place that ensures white supremacy, then there wouldn't be any arguments because everyone would know what it is. The problem is that whites lie about being racist to promote this fake democracy where all men/women are treated equally. The point in acknowledging the fact that 44/45 presidents have been white men is to expose the ideology of white male supremacy that this country was founded on. If we're supposed to expect white supremacy in Amerikkka the way that you expect Chinese supremacy in China then let's rip up the constitution so that we can start being real instead of wasting time faking the funk.

 

[TTT]

Apartheid South Africa imported labor from black African countries as well as exploiting black South Africans. Numerical superiority does not always translate to political power, women comprise a large voting bloc in many countries but that does not mean they automatically get political power. Tucker sees this in a rudimentary manner, to get to the top of business, politics etc there are many filters and ways of reducing political influence. For instance , even if a large number of immigrants are admitted to the US you wont get many of them clamoring for political office they would need to be a natural born citizen in the first place and first generation immigrants are more likely to be concerned with other things. Tucker is obviously not well read on the issues and relies on typical Fox outrage strategies. A poster mentioned that the best way to win those debates is not to treat them like you are going to change their minds on anything, it reminds me of Colbert of O'Reilly and he just went there to troll and make O'reilly look silly. I did not see the Tariq interview but if he even conceded any point about his tweets or tried to deflect he chose the wrong option because that is how your typical Fox anchor debates issues by simply latching on to side issues at the expense of any other facts.

 

[CarbonBraddock]

the tucker guy got owned but he did make a valid point. it is not in the best interest of whites to allow other ethnic groups to flood into the country unless they can absolutely guarantee that their(white) power will not be taken away since, on paper, this is a type of democracy, the groups that are not white eventually may be majority and could then vote all the whites out. it seems like he doesn't have the ability to put into words what he thinks very well.

 

[Rawtid]

White people are so delusional.