It's also in the fukking State Department press release. My
2 replies and you still won't acknowledge it.
and again....you changed the topic
It's also in the fukking State Department press release. My
Acknowledged what? Lay out your argument and back it up with something. I showed your dumbass that the 1.7b and 400m was mentioned in the press briefing on 1/19/16 and in the press release from the State Department on 1/17/16.2 replies and you still won't acknowledge it.
and again....you changed the topic
Acknowledged what? Lay out your argument and back it up with something. I showed your dumbass that the 1.7b and 400m was mentioned in the press briefing on 1/19/16 and in the press release from the State Department on 1/17/16.
this'll be my last reply to you: everybody can see how functionally retarded you are:
1) you argued that this was "OLD NEWS"
2) i said the 400 million dollar part was the NEWS that has people talking - Obama and the white house has acknowledged this
3) here you are now with the goal post across the street talking about "acknowledge what!?"
so here weirdo: at 5:40 Obama admits himself that the "NEWS" is what i just said - the 400 million dollar payment.
the white house is arguing that this 400 million should be clumped in with the january announcement - that's not for them to decide
PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: Okay. It's been interesting to watch this story surface. Some of you may recall, we announced these payments in January. Many months ago. There wasn't a secret. We announced them. To all of you. Josh did a briefing on them.
This wasn't some "nefarious deal." At the time we expressed that Iran had pressed a claim in a tribunal about money of theirs we had frozen that as a consequence of it working its way through the international tribunal it was the assessment of our lawyers where we are are at a point that there was significant litigation risk and we could cost ourselves billions of dollars. It was their advice and suggestion that we settle.
So what I'm interested in is if there is news to be made, why not have some of these folks who were predicting disaster say, you know, this thing actually worked. That would be a shock. That would be impressive. If some of these folks who had said the sky is falling, suddenly said, you know what, we were wrong, and we are glad that Iran no longer has the capacity to break out in short term and develop a nuclear weapon.
But of course that wasn't going to happen. Instead what we have is the manufacturing of outrage in a story that we disclosed in January. And the only bit of news that is relevant on this is that we paid cash.
this'll be my last reply to you: everybody can see how functionally retarded you are:
1) you argued that this was "OLD NEWS"
2) i said the 400 million dollar part was the NEWS that has people talking - Obama and the white house has acknowledged this
3) here you are now with the goal post across the street talking about "acknowledge what!?"
so here weirdo: at 5:40 Obama admits himself that the "NEWS" is what i just said - the 400 million dollar payment.
the white house is arguing that this 400 million should be clumped in with the january announcement - that's not for them to decide
Oh god, you can't be seri
But they did announce the $400 million in January. The only part they didn't disclose was that it was in cash. That was Obama's point--the only "news" to this story is the method of payment, which makes it seem like something out of a spy novel. He's saying nobody would consider it news if it was a $400 million wire transfer--which, as the President explained, wasn't feasible due to banking restrictions.
I don't need help. You're just not good at articulating yourself. If your point was really only about the payment being in cash and not this ransom or payment disclosure bullshyt then I apologize for the hostility. It's still a non-story though. How else were they going to pay them?nikka. the wall street journal broke the story about the cash. which is what obama just said in this video.
that's literally the only point i was making.
there is seriously something wrong w/you fam. you need to get some help.
Well on the previous page you did say that the White House didn't disclose the "400 million." I guess what you meant was that they didn't tell us it was in cash. And you're correct. I just don't see what the big deal is--we owed them money and gave it to them the quickest way we could as a good faith measure. What difference does it make whether it was cash or a bank transfer?you're confusing me too. you're literally repeating my point.
i was just telling the OP that donald trump didn't break this story.
you dudes are so uptight and shook over this story man that you all aren't even thinking straight
I don't need help. You're just not good at articulating yourself. If your point was really only about the payment being in cash and not this ransom bullshyt then I apologize for the hostility. It's still a non-story though. How else were they going to pay them?
Well on the previous page you did say that the White House didn't disclose the "400 million." I guess what you meant was that they didn't tell us it was in cash. And you're correct. I just don't see what the big deal is--we owed them money and gave it to them the quickest way we could as a good faith measure. What difference does it make whether it was cash or a bank transfer?
I don't think you know what goalpost moving means. We were just talking past each other.you're still being weird. the 400 million was the cash payment.
in all your goal post moving, you're wanting people to say "400 million cash" just to appease you.
you can suck the toaster strudel out of my shyt with a coffee stirrer sir.
I said 400 million you know what the fukk i'm talking about. take your straight jacket needing self the fukk on somewhere...
same to you: the wall street journal broke the story about the 400 million cash (which really was known in IRAN just not over here)
whether i say cash or 400 million, it's the same thing. we didn't know the details of the payment that was announced in january...the story broke, and it looks like a fukking ransom payment. <<<<FACTS. NOT OPINION. please stop showering me with all these feels and emotions brothers...
I don't think you know what goalpost moving means. We were just talking past each other.
Anyway, this all could have been avoided if you just said "cash".
Still doesn't make it a ransom payment.
It's bad optics, sure. 'Bout it though.and as other people have pointed out to you, myself included
if this was NOT a ransom payment, this is one of the most unfortunate timings of an international payment in the history of international payments.
It's bad optics, sure. 'Bout it though.