Only women who should be 200+ or athletes or 6’2 and up. Anything else is wild sloppy
It’s never justified unless she’s 6’4+
Only women who should be 200+ or athletes or 6’2 and up. Anything else is wild sloppy
It’s never justified unless she’s 6’4+
And my point is 200+ lbs looks different on everyone. This is the same woman and even she looks totally different in both pics being over 200 lbs. She happens to be pear shaped but someone her same height and weight might store fat in their upper body which will look totally different lean or not
And my point is 200+ lbs looks different on everyone. This is the same woman and even she looks totally different in both pics being over 200 lbs. She happens to be pear shaped but someone her same height and weight might store fat in their upper body which will look totally different lean or not
And my point is 200+ lbs looks different on everyone. This is the same woman and even she looks totally different in both pics being over 200 lbs. She happens to be pear shaped but someone her same height and weight might store fat in their upper body which will look totally different lean or not
And my point is 200+ lbs looks different on everyone. This is the same woman and even she looks totally different in both pics being over 200 lbs. She happens to be pear shaped but someone her same height and weight might store fat in their upper body which will look totally different lean or not
That’s muscle not fat. What the hell you talking about?
You said fat looks different on different people then used a muscle bound woman as an example. Why not show a 200+ women with little to no muscle to back up your claimThat's exactly what I'd like to ask you
First you asked is a woman over 200 lbs ok, then it shifted to body fat, now it's muscle. If you wanted to talk about specific semantics say that in your initial post. Wanting an absolute answer when there's isn't one because the topic is nuanced is wild. Again, bodies are different. 200 lbs will look different on all of us
You said fat looks different on different people then used a muscle bound woman as an example. Why not show a 200+ women with little to no muscle to back up your claim
And depending on that woman’s height, even with the muscle 215 is way too big. It’s more than just looks. Body builders lose weight all the time(on purpose) for that very reason
You’re being disingenuous. And moving the goal post. Have a good day. CacI used her to show how 200 lbs on a woman can look good/normal. Everyone knows how it looks if the person doesn't work out or is sloppy why show that?
You’re being disingenuous. And moving the goal post. Have a good day. Cac
These "My girl can't be over 155" brehs just don't know what they're missing.The difference between 210 to 225.
I'm taking 225 look at the fat on them thighs and ass.. can see it from the front