A lot of you guys claiming "weirdo" rap is the new trend sound like he personally offended you.
He did start to sound ridiculous though. The point, that he was trying to make, is that never before in hip hop has it be so cool to be the victim instead of the one causing the action. He's referring to all these people OD'ing about rapping about being on mollys, etc., and that's the cool thing instead of being the guy pushing it (I'm not say it's right). Aside from that, he's basically saying these new rappers are too in touch with their feelings to the point where it becomes whiny and nauseating. In his eyes, when the music came from the ruggedness, swagger and action of the streets it was at its highest quality. To him, that is the default position of rap and that anything that deviates from that is "weird" but what he means is that it's a sub-genre of hip hop. It is no different than African-American culture in general where what is culturally "black" has been defined by those at the bottom more so than with any other group of people (right or wrong). What is common in hip hop is the hustler, and he says that he has no problems with those that deviate from that, but that they are not the norm and in his case "weirdos."
Somewhere in there, many of you agree with him too or there would not have been all that approval about Pusha T's album being a legitimate traditional hip hop album and a reprieve from everything else. I think most people listen to different types of rappers and appreciate them for what they do, but it's now reached a point where this hipster faction and new age rap fan feels that they can dictate, demean and form a cultural critique of every single rap artist based on their narrow conceptions of what is or isn't acceptable. There "critiques" are less about music and more akin to normative analyses about what rappers, and the communities they come from should be doing. They're often short-sighted, even if the dope boy is largely played out.