To be honest. We need to have some form of population control(not killing) for the be

AB Ziggy

AB Ziggy

Banned
Joined
Dec 14, 2012
Messages
10,686
Reputation
-985
Daps
25,612
It's better so we won't have to end up having to work so damn hard for a single job due to the intense competition of many of their peers competing for that same position. And what happens to those who don't get the job and can't do anything else. They end up on the streets if there's no other option they can take. The fact is, the more the global population grows, the more competition there will be among them to secure careers in the future. Eventually there will be too many people and not enough positions to fill, just as it is happening enough today with so many college graduates not securing their respective jobs. Back in the mid-20th century, it was much easier to find jobs because they were more readily available since the world population then was at least half of what it was now. I'm not saying we shouldn't have kids at all, but we need to have less of them around for their own futures. Let's say in 2050 and we have 15 billion people around. How many jobs can we provide for all of those people of their interests?

If yall hate on me for this mentality. Fine. But that's what I'm starting to think.
 
Vandelay

Vandelay

Waxing Intellectual
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
23,011
Reputation
5,610
Daps
79,774
Reppin
Phi Chi Connection
The government is just going end up subsidizing everything for those at or around the poverty line, which is going to swell something serious in the next 30 years. QoL will diminish, but its cool cause youtube, and xvideos will distract everyone.


Either that or there will be a revolution.

Let someone go 3 days without food or water and watch how 'civilized' a person will remain.

I'm going with the former. The status quo wants to maintain that with the least amount of unrest possible.
 
Toe Jay Simpson

Toe Jay Simpson

Searchin’
Joined
May 12, 2012
Messages
23,598
Reputation
7,538
Daps
127,733
Reppin
Carmel City
How bout instead of controlling the population controlling the billionaires who cut jobs so they can still declare "record profits"

Just like the water crisis, just like the food shortage...there's enough everything for everybody. But it's not enough to meet both the extreme satisfactions of the grossly entitled and the basic needs of the have nots. We'll let 3rd world nations drink dirty water as long as our golf courses get that good stuff everyday

You're doing what they want you to do by thinking the problem is people just like you
 
Orbital-Fetus

Orbital-Fetus

cross that bridge
Supporter
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
40,290
Reputation
17,645
Daps
146,070
Reppin
Humanity
Toe Jay Simpson said:
How bout instead of controlling the population controlling the billionaires who cut jobs so they can still declare "record profits"

Just like the water crisis, just like the food shortage...there's enough everything for everybody. But it's not enough to meet both the extreme satisfactions of the grossly entitled and the basic needs of the have nots. We'll let 3rd world nations drink dirty water as long as our golf courses get that good stuff everyday

You're doing what they want you to do by thinking the problem is people just like you
Click to expand...

yup...every person on Earth could live in the state of Texas with a population density similar to that of New York City.

http://persquaremile.com/2011/01/18/if-the-worlds-population-lived-in-one-city/

At NYC's Density, the World's Population Could Live in Texas : TreeHugger
 
Still FloW

Still FloW

Gawd Of Shinobi
Joined
Dec 5, 2012
Messages
16,860
Reputation
4,745
Daps
58,102
Reppin
Inside K. Michelle's Box
HUUH

AQkCgc7.gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top