To Add More Fuel to the Fire, The Ravens kicker missed

[No1]

It's pretty much a 50/50 call. If it went the other way ravens fans would be bytching.

The Pats have literally built a dynasty off EVERY questionable call going their way for a decade, so

Name them. Take out the tuck rule and name them. But you dumb asses can't. People hate New England so much because they win that if they lose and it ruins the sanctity of the game then it's all good. This must be what being a bitter bytch looks like.

The Patriots lost their dynasty off of suspect calls NOT going in their favor. You can't be serious. Shout out to that PI in the Colts AFC championship game.

 

[23Barrettcity]

For all of yall saying its good...u do realize that the WHOLE ball has to be inside, right?

The refs there have the best angle

 

[ReplacementRef]

Tell that to the Packers lol

 

[3rdLetter]

I'm surprised I haven't seen any camera angles from under the goal post. NFL always had those.

 

[Real]

The refs there have the best angle

Post of the day

After lastnight u honestly believe them nikkas know what the fukk they're doing?

 

[Sam Peel]

 

[STAN JONES]

Name them. Take out the tuck rule and name them. But you dumb asses can't. People hate New England so much because they win that if they lose and it ruins the sanctity of the game then it's all good. This must be what being a bitter bytch looks like.

The Patriots lost their dynasty off of suspect calls NOT going in their favor. You can't be serious. Shout out to that PI in the Colts AFC championship game.

This nikka delusional as fukk

 

[gldnone913]

It's pretty much a 50/50 call. If it went the other way ravens fans would be bytching.

The Pats have literally built a dynasty off EVERY questionable call going their way for a decade, so

 

[No1]

This nikka delusional as fukk

Breh, I'm known for keeping calls one hundred. I've been asking since 2009 for one person to point out calls outside of "the tuck rule" which was the rule and no one can.

Do you see me defending the Steelers? Nope. We all know what it is with that.

But you guys have got nothing on the Pats. But it's all right you had that same look on your face before the AFCCG last year too.

 

[KillbertArenas]

kick was good

 

[STAN JONES]

Breh, I'm known for keeping calls one hundred. I've been asking since 2009 for one person to point out calls outside of "the tuck rule" which was the rule and no one can.

Do you see me defending the Steelers? Nope. We all know what it is with that.

But you guys have got nothing on the Pats. But it's all right you had that same look on your face before the AFCCG last year too.

Breh I literally see a shytload of bad or phantom calls that go in y'all favor every fukking time I see a pats game

If you dont see the same thing then you're delusional breh

No team get help from the league as much as y'all,why you think y'all always get one of the easiest schedules every fukking year

I really don't want to hear no complaining from pats or steeler fans cause nobody has benifited more from bad calls over the years then y'all two

Ravens got cheated last week when we played the eagles but you don't see us crying do you?

 

[Shogun]

Name them. Take out the tuck rule and name them. But you dumb asses can't. People hate New England so much because they win that if they lose and it ruins the sanctity of the game then it's all good. This must be what being a bitter bytch looks like.

The Patriots lost their dynasty off of suspect calls NOT going in their favor. You can't be serious. Shout out to that PI in the Colts AFC championship game.

no offense man but your the most irrational poster when it come to the Patriots.

If you're seriously going to try an argue that the Pats haven't benefited from favorable officiating than you must not have been watching many of their games. Or at least watching them objectively.

And I aint even talking about the tuck rule. Forget that.

Throughout their run there's been countless suspect roughing the passer calls, countless suspect defensive holding calls, countless suspect no-calls against them. There's literally been so many, that its hard to take you seriously when you deny it. Now these aren't blatant game breaking calls like we've seen the past few days, but a free 1st down hear, and there adds up.

shyt like this



again, it didn't break the game but it adds up.

or



shyt, you even got Rodney, Tom's biggest cheerleader, calling him out Its alright breh, you can be honest too....no one will revoke your #1 fanboy status

I'm not saying the Pats aren't a great team. Of course they are, but every team that played them for a long time had to beat biased referees on top of a great team. So even if your convinced that field goal was no good (which of course you are) you can't deny that it was a 50/50 call that even regular refs would have struggled with. If things didn't go the Pats way this time then...as I originally stated...

*waits for your smug, "my team is great so I know everything about football" response*

 

[Danie84]

They better not screw with Big Blue. You knw how the middle of the season gets for us.

 

[Shogun]

Name them. Take out the tuck rule and name them. But you dumb asses can't. People hate New England so much because they win that if they lose and it ruins the sanctity of the game then it's all good. This must be what being a bitter bytch looks like.

The Patriots lost their dynasty off of suspect calls NOT going in their favor. You can't be serious. Shout out to that PI in the Colts AFC championship game.

no offense man but your the most irrational poster when it come to the Patriots.

If you're seriously going to try an argue that the Pats haven't benefited from favorable officiating than you must not have been watching many of their games. Or at least watching them objectively.

And I aint even talking about the tuck rule. Forget that.

Throughout their run there's been countless suspect roughing the passer calls, countless suspect defensive holding calls, countless suspect no-calls against them. There's literally been so many, that its hard to take you seriously when you deny it. Now these aren't blatant game breaking calls like we've seen the past few days, but a free 1st down hear, and there adds up.

shyt like this

Redskins Patriots bad pass interference call on Santana Mos - YouTube

again, it didn't break the game but it adds up.

or

Rodney Harrison and Ray Lewis diss Tom Brady - YouTube

shyt, you even got Rodney, Tom's biggest cheerleader, calling him out Its alright breh, you can be honest too....no one will revoke your #1 fanboy status

I'm not saying the Pats aren't a great team. Of course they are, but every team that played them for a long time had to beat biased referees on top of a great team. So even if your convinced that field goal was no good (which of course you are) you can't deny that it was a 50/50 call that even regular refs would have struggled with. If things didn't go the Pats way this time then...as I originally stated...

*waits for your smug, "my team is great so I know everything about football" response*

Nothing? I thought you were "known for keeping it one hundred"

 

[HollywoodP]

looks like he barely made it, but that whole if any part of the ball goes over then it's good is retarded. because if they were even a little higher it would've bounced off.

I don't agree...cuz it would be impossible to determine trajectory and if would bounce if it went over slightly. The rule makes sense the way they have it...if they changed it that way it would make things a whole lot more complicated.