No the fukk it isn't
Titanfall 2 | PS4/XB1/PC | Out Now
- Thread starter Kamikaze Revy
- Start date
-
- Tags
- pc ps4 titanfall titanfall 2 xb1
Double dipping this bytch PS4 and PCGOAT FPS since Halo 2
Do cats still play Titanfall? Might get it just to prepare for 2...
Yes it is, how the fukk are you trying to argue that destiny is anything like titanfall?No the fukk it isn't
Borderlands is the closest thing to it.
I'm convinced you've never played any of these games
The "campaign" in destiny is not a traditional campaign like other shooters. It's basically just the strike missions with a couple voice overs and cutscenes. Same way as the Division campaign.
It's similar to titanfall in that titanfall's campaign is just the Normal multiplayer matches with some voice overs and cutscenes. Titanfall even has a Co-op mode that has some extra voice overs and cutscenes, but I still wouldn't compare that to a real campaign.
not really on PC. At most you'll see 900 people on, Xbox One still gets thousands of players at a time.Do cats still play Titanfall? Might get it just to prepare for 2...
martin payne
All Star
rip to COD in my house, gears4 and titan2>>>>>
Casual.Too much shyt going on
I'm starting to debate if you played the game for more than a hour or so. The campaign is absolute garbage but the MP is far from incomplete.No point in arguing over liking the game or not. There's enough people who do to warrant a sequel by next year this time.
I personally think anyone that paid even close to full price got scammed. Having paid ten bucks or so, reflecting on the game now I wouldn't have paid any more than that. The MP never had close to $60 of content even with all the DLC for free. Not enough variety between the game modes (sans the tower one that stood out) but they'll cram more maps in at cost.
I paid $10 or $20 for it with all the DLC and had a blast.
I think it got hurt pretty bad for being an exclusive.
This definitely was a factor but I don't think the game would have been made without the exclusivity for MS.
I don't know, I got it around launch and I loved the game. The DLC map thing sucked, really divided the population but Xbox One still has thousands of people playing
I wish I could understand the "if it was cheaper, it would be worthwhile/good/great" argument people have for games almost exclusively
Because I expect to have more content with a $60 purchases (which I rarely buy at that price). Titanfall at $60 you get only MP with less content than free to play games and about the same kind of fun. Top of that having to pay for extra maps. I mean you had less content than a base release Battlefield game which is already a bad enough buy, but it looks meatier by comparison. You can judge by hours of fun which is an acceptable metric for the player, but I personally don't want to pay out for slightly varied game modes of each other and price gouging for DLC (which is essentially map packs). Then again this is EA publishing.
A good example, I bought The Orange Box a decade ago for Team Fortress 2, which is also MP only. At $60 on launch even that game would not have been worth it alone. Instead, it came with the Half-Life 2 releases and Portal packed in, making it a heavy value even at $60. Ten years later TF2 is free to play and has had a decade of support with a newly added in matchmaking system. Clearly a better buy in terms of content.
Titanfall to me had about $10 worth of stuff to play. The gameplay was fast and fun, but I have Quake Live to satisfy my arena itch and even that old game has more content in the restricted form that is Quake Live than Titanfall does.
Again, I just don't see it as a good value at the launch price. MAYBE this second one will be better in terms of what you get at that price. And I don't restrict it to just games either.