Timothy Bradley: I Am A Better Fighter Than Pacquiao

[Newzz]

Aside from the fact that he is a horribly non-entertaining fighter to watch in the ring, it is shyt like this quote that really makes me dislike Bradley:


You aren't too nice...you just have zero KO power and fight in a dull anti-action fukking style. That is why you have 12 KOs in 31 fights. He is the biggest hype job that Bob Arum has ever produced and it boggles my mind that people buy into it.

A hype job with legitimate victories over Nate Campbell, Lamont Peterson, Devon Alexander, Ruslan Provodnikov, and Juan Manuel Marquez?

Timothy Bradley is far from a hype job

 

[mr. smoke weed]

Upon re-watching the JMM fight bradley won that shyt 9-3 8-4 if you're generous. It was an exciting fight with Bradley flashing all types of D. JMM didn't conduct an interview in the ring. @Jello Biafra is this not the type of boxing you enjoy?

 

[Jello Biafra]

Okay there breh where did I compare the careers of Marquez Pacquiao and Bradley? A controversial W over pac man yea he got one. Marquez? He clearly beat marquez.
A fukking boxing fan telling me that hit and not get hit is boring boxing? Sorry breh, I think we're different types of boxing fans.

Upon re-watching the JMM fight bradley won that shyt 9-3 8-4 if you're generous. It was an exciting fight with Bradley flashing all types of D. JMM didn't conduct an interview in the ring. @Jello Biafra is this not the type of boxing you enjoy?

Did you miss the part where I laid out the different types of defensive fighters? Bradley is not an entertaining defensive fighter. He's the opposite of entertaining.

 

[mr. smoke weed]

You need to re-catch the fights then breh.

 

[Jello Biafra]

A hype job with legitimate victories over Nate Campbell, Lamont Peterson, Devon Alexander, Ruslan Provodnikov, and Juan Manuel Marquez?

Timothy Bradley is far from a hype job

No one gave two fukks about Bradley's wins over Campbell, Alexander and Peterson. The talk of him being supposedly great is all off of his last three bouts against Pac (a gift), Provodnikov (controversial and disputed), and Marquez (a bland split decision borefest). If he didn't get a gift over Pac and if the ref actually counted the knockdown in the guest against Provodnikov then we would still be mentioning Bradley as being in the same level as Devon Alexander.

 

[Jello Biafra]

You need to re-catch the fights then breh.

I don't need to re-watch anything. Bradley has had 2 entertaining matches in his whole career tops.

 

[mr. smoke weed]

No one gave two fukks about Bradley's wins over Campbell, Alexander and Peterson. The talk of him being supposedly great is all off of his last three bouts against Pac (a gift), Provodnikov (controversial and disputed), and Marquez (a bland split decision borefest). If he didn't get a gift over Pac and if the ref actually counted the knockdown in the guest against Provodnikov then we would still be mentioning Bradley as being in the same level as Devon Alexander.

Bradley been pound for pound for 173 weeks breh. You don't like bradley that's cool. Don't throw shade and be blatantly wrong though.

 

[Jello Biafra]

Bradley been pound for pound for 173 weeks breh. You don't like bradley that's cool. Don't throw shade and be blatantly wrong though.

How am I wrong? He is a bore that hovered around the bottom half of the Ring's pound for pound rankings until that gift against Pacquiao.

 

[mr. smoke weed]

Do you know any of the fights during Bradley's showtime run breh?

 

[HARLEM AL]

How am I wrong? He is a bore that hovered around the bottom half of the Ring's pound for pound rankings until that gift against Pacquiao.

Please stop homie

 

[patscorpio]

for the record whereas i thought bradley was soundly defeated by pac..he did beat ruslan in a close fight....the only slight in that fight was the ref not calling the first KD in the round 1 which would have made the fight a draw and i also thought soundly beat marquez on some 9 to 3 type shyt

 

[Newzz]

No one gave two fukks about Bradley's wins over Campbell, Alexander and Peterson. The talk of him being supposedly great is all off of his last three bouts against Pac (a gift), Provodnikov (controversial and disputed), and Marquez (a bland split decision borefest). If he didn't get a gift over Pac and if the ref actually counted the knockdown in the guest against Provodnikov then we would still be mentioning Bradley as being in the same level as Devon Alexander.

But yet you think Keith Thurman is the truth while Timothy Bradley's resume shyts all over his AND he's faced much tougher competition

 

[patscorpio]

But yet you think Keith Thurman is the truth while Timothy Bradley's resume shyts all over his AND he's faced much tougher competition

its not more the resume breh with bradley....i get where jello is coming from...its how he fights...similar to how i felt about watching john ruiz fight...it drove me crazy..has been for years..since the witter fight...i hated the constant headbutting, the no jab, and the bad punching mechanics (with the exception of the overhand right)...i felt it was wild amateurish and why i can't get behind him...but i respected the conditioning...there are numerous of fighters i would rather watch than tim bradley

 

[Jello Biafra]

But yet you think Keith Thurman is the truth while Timothy Bradley's resume shyts all over his AND he's faced much tougher competition

Keith Thurman is a baby in the sport...comparing him and Bradley is stupid. I do prefer to watch Thurman's fights though.
And he's better than Broner.

 

[Jello Biafra]

Do you know any of the fights during Bradley's showtime run breh?

Didn't we have that debate in another thread already? Someone mentioning Bradley's Showtime fights like they were a series of "Thrillers in Manila" seems very familiar sounding.