DEDE BROWN
Rookie
Bad neighborhoods can be watched 24 7 now
This HD Video From Space Is Going To Change The World
- Thread starter theworldismine13
- Start date
So whats that robot doing on Mars?
Is a robot a man?
You realize there's a layer of radiation that surrounds an area of space around the Earth
and no human being can survive passing through it, they haven't discovered the proper shielding
dude, thats just flat out fukking wrong.
thats not even how space fukking works.
Lets say we didn't go to the moon the first time.
I'll give you one.
THERE WERE SIX OTHER LUNAR MISSIONS
DEDE BROWN
Rookie
do you really believe that conspiracy theory lol...cmon bro its 2014..realize whats true and not
It
dude, thats just flat out fukking wrong.
thats not even how space fukking works.
Lets say we didn't go to the moon the first time.
I'll give you one.
THERE WERE SIX OTHER LUNAR MISSIONS
It's called the VAN ALLEN BELT
Nasa just discovered a THIRD LAYER TO THE BELT LAST YEAR
so if they already been to the Moon they would already know how many layers it was
there could be more, they don't even know how big the belt is, DUMB ASS
Your understanding of radiation is flawed
We're talking about the surface of the moon...something you can protect against ON the moon with the right clothes.
I guess we're going to have to debunk your shyt now
Your understanding of radiation is flawed
We're talking about the surface of the moon...something you can protect against ON the moon with the right clothes.
I guess we're going to have to debunk your shyt now
You have to understand a space flight flying through that belt would FRY anybody inside of it, you have understand how intense it is
because of the material the ship is made off
What do you think with all the advancements we've made in Video Technology, there isn't a crystal clear 1080p video of The Surface the moon or a clear a video of a man on the moon, or fukk even a Ship with people on it anywhere near the moon
and also it doesn't change the fact, that if they would know the Van Hellen belt had a third layer
if they made it all the way to the Moon, because they would have had to pass through it
also the date of the moon landing, there were solar flares and other shyt going on space, that would've render all the electronic instruments useless if they were on the moon
look at the facts if a Murder tells a detective he didn't do it, it's not gonna just say OK
you can't believe shyt anybody tells you if the facts don't add up
http://spacemath.gsfc.nasa.gov/weekly/3Page7.pdf
4. Some people believe that the Apollo moon landings were a hoax because astronauts would have
been instantly killed in the radiation belts. According to the US Occupation Safety and Health Agency
(OSHA) a lethal radiation dosage is 300 Rads in one hour. What is your answer to the 'moon landing
hoax' believers?
Note: According to radiation dosimeters carried by Apollo astronauts, their total dosage for the entire trip to the moon and return
was not more than 2 Rads over 6 days.
The total dosage for the trip is only 11.4 Rads in 52.8 minutes. Because 52.8 minutes is equal to 0.88
hours, his is equal to a dosage of 11.4 Rads / 0.88 hours = 13 Rads in one hour, which is well below
the 300 Rads in one hour that is considered to be lethal.
Also, this radiation exposure would be for an astronaut outside the spacecraft during the transit through
the belts. The radiation shielding inside the spacecraft cuts down the 13 Rads/hour exposure so that it is
completely harmless.
Once again I'm not gonna ask the liar for the truth
s
go find some source from independent reseacher
also it doesn't explain them just knowing the third layer was there
in 2013 if we went to the MOon in the 60's
and ask yourself with all the advancements in broadcasting technology why haven't there's been another moon landing live in Color
Dawg, this makes NO fukking sense.
Learning shyt in the future doesn't preclude the efforts taken in the past.
Environment
1. The astronauts could not have survived the trip because of exposure to radiation from the Van Allen radiation belt and galactic ambient radiation (see radiation poisoning and health threat from cosmic rays). Some conspiracists have suggested that Starfish Prime (a high-altitude nuclear test in 1962) was a failed attempt to disrupt the Van Allen belts.
- There are two main Van Allen belts - the inner belt and the outer belt - and a transient third belt.[104] The inner belt is the more dangerous one, containing energetic protons. The outer one has less-dangerous low-energy electrons (Beta particles).[105][106] The Apollo spacecraft passed through the inner belt in a matter of minutes and the outer belt in about 11⁄2 hours.[106] The astronauts were shielded from the ionizing radiation by the aluminum hulls of the spacecraft.[106][107] Furthermore, the orbital transfer trajectory from Earth to the Moon through the belts was chosen to lessen radiation exposure.[107] Even Dr. James Van Allen, the discoverer of the Van Allen radiation belts, rebutted the claims that radiation levels were too harmful for the Apollo missions.[108] Plait cited an average dose of less than 1 rem (10 mSv), which is equivalent to the ambient radiation received by living at sea level for three years.[109] The spacecraft passed through the intense inner belt and the low-energy outer belt. The total radiation received on the trip was about the same as allowed for workers in the nuclear energy field for a year[106][110] and not much more than what Space Shuttle astronauts received.[105]
Where is this even from
I can quote a bunch of shyt too saying the exact opposite all over the web
just because you copy and paste something doesn't make it truth, and there's no proof James Van Allen even said that
Look at the obvious
No HD moon footage
No man on the moon since the moon landing film
I mean damn, you think would have a black man on the moon by now
no Russian Moon landing, they have a pretty good space program
hmm
You think they would be able to stream a moon landing on the internet in this day in age
being that they could Broadcast it in 1964 for no programs no interference
yet your Direct TV can't even get a good signal when it rains hard
also wear is the live feed from this robot on Mars
show me a video of the surface of mars
man yall believe everything
There isn't a rocket a man can build that will be powerful enough to break Earth's orbit
and being that rocket fuel cannot burn in space, there's no to sustain that trust long enough to push a ship pass Earth's orbit, it's impossible that's why the soviet's never attempted it
you need an entirely different propulsion system for space travel and it hasn't been invented yet
Last edited:
the footage is VERY high quality.
I take it that you know nothing about film.
Film has a higher resolution than digital
Its expensive to keep going and we've been there several times
stupid statement
The chinese just landed a robot there last year
more bullshyt
Thats not the same signal, dummy
Go look at nasa's website
Mars is exponentially farther than the moon. It takes 7 minutes for light to travel. Not the 2 seconds it takes for the moon.
and you know nothing.
This is patently false. Unless you wanna explain the not 1, not 2, but FOUR robots on mars.
So now you don't understand basic physic yet?
So I guess God just put those satellites up there, huh?
the footage is VERY high quality.
I take it that you know nothing about film.
Film has a higher resolution than digital
Its expensive to keep going and we've been there several times
stupid statement
The chinese just landed a robot there last year
more bullshyt
Thats not the same signal, dummy
Go look at nasa's website
Mars is exponentially farther than the moon. It takes 7 minutes for light to travel. Not the 2 seconds it takes for the moon.
and you know nothing.
This is patently false. Unless you wanna explain the not 1, not 2, but FOUR robots on mars.
So now you don't understand basic physic yet?
So I guess God just put those satellites up there, huh?
Show me a high quality video of men on the moon
the video capabilities we have no a vastly superior then, anyone can see that why would you make such a dumb statement, also digital has surpassed film which is why it's extinct, in movie theater's have stopped ordering reels
so you tell me the Moon landing footage is a higher resolution than this
are you that fukking moronic
Show me the robots on Mars
You said its too expensive to go, but we haven't been back in decades
Nasa funding started at 5 percent to now 1 percent, because they haven't made any real progress all this time
once again Satellites orbit, they're not traversing the galaxy
you said China landed a robot on the moon, okay the can easily put a camera on it, where's the footage
I ask simple questions still no answers, that tells you something is wrong
this ninggaz drove a buggy on the moon, do you know how ridiculous that is
Last edited: