This c00n hasn’t even been in the senate a full term and he’s writing memoirs?

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,691
Daps
203,913
Reppin
the ether
I’ve personally never seen this guy take any strong opinion either way. All he does is find snobby language to defend the establishment. Ukraine got blown out too by the way so all that bullshyt you’ve been talking is out the door kid.

:dahell:


This is mind-blowing inaccurate to the point where I'm not even sure you recognize my screenname.

You've never seen me take a strong opinion? You think I'm pro-establishment? You think I didn't expect Ukraine to get blown out? What? :what:


There's a huge thread going on literally right now where all the pro-establishment guys are attacking me for not being pro-establishment and not believing that Ukraine can defeat Putin on the military battlefield. Where I have a massive 6-paragraph post attacking everything the Democratic establishment has done for the last 30 years. If you think that I'm pro-establishment, that I thought Ukraine can win, and that I don't take strong opinions, then you just proved that your don't even read what I post.
 

Broke Wave

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
18,704
Reputation
4,580
Daps
44,589
Reppin
Open Society Foundation
:dahell:


This is mind-blowing inaccurate to the point where I'm not even sure you recognize my screenname.

You've never seen me take a strong opinion? You think I'm pro-establishment? You think I didn't expect Ukraine to get blown out? What? :what:


There's a huge thread going on literally right now where all the pro-establishment guys are attacking me for not being pro-establishment and not believing that Ukraine can defeat Putin on the military battlefield. Where I have a massive 6-paragraph post attacking everything the Democratic establishment has done for the last 30 years. If you think that I'm pro-establishment, that I thought Ukraine can win, and that I don't take strong opinions, then you just proved that your don't even read what I post.
Buddy I’ve argued with you before and all I see you post is equivocations and word salads defending democrats. Just take the mask off and be a man. I’m not going to look back at my posts but you are 100 percent a pro establishment stooge. There is not one independent thought in your mind. You just try and find the more “intellectual” and “nuance” way to support the status quo. I try not to read your posts because they are revoltingly pretentious.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,691
Daps
203,913
Reppin
the ether
Buddy I’ve argued with you before and all I see you post is equivocations and word salads defending democrats. Just take the mask off and be a man.

Because when I'm arguing with you I'm arguing with an idiot who posts right-wing talking points. If you had read any of my other posts ever you see that I'm not even a Democrat and I hate the democratic establishment. But I always argue against bullshyt right-wing lies, that doesn't make me pro-establishment.

Napoleon is the most pro-establishment guy here and I've had him on ignore for 3 years because I got sick of arguing with his bullshyt. Pressure and 88m3 are massive pro-establishment guys and they hate my guts. You really need to get out more.



I’m not going to look back at my posts but you are 100 percent a pro establishment stooge. There is not one independent thought in your mind. You just try and find the more “intellectual” and “nuance” way to support the status quo.

I'm convinced you don't even understand the words that you're using.



This is a typical comment from me from just a few days ago. Everyone who actually reads political posts knows that this is the exact same posting I've done for 7 years (like all the way back in 2015 and 2016 when I defended people who refused to vote for Clinton). If you think is "pro-establishment" or "support the status quo" you're a fukking idiot:

Spot on. I feel like my entire adult life has been Groundhog Day in Democratic politics.


* Spent the entire mid/late 1990s lurching hard to the right - crime bills, welfare reform, massive deregulation of finance and industry, and huge neoliberal trade bills - that gave a temporary deceptive economic boost soon followed by a crash and setting the stage for a completely fukked up economy (and globe) in the 2000s. But when all their pandering failed to win them the presidency in 2000, they blamed.....a few thousand leftist voters for the Greens rather than the tens of millions of Democrats who hadn't voted at all.

* Spent the early 2000s lurching HARDER to the right, with many establishment dems joining forces with Republicans on some of Bush's most radical changes to the nation (huge tax cuts, the industry giveaway called Medicare Part D, War on Iraq, Patriot Act, and No Child Left Behind). Then in 2004 they pushed aside the liberal hopefuls to nominate a milquetoast moderate instead....and when he lost predictably (as there was little image-wise to even distinguish him from Bush, just another rich white capitalist who supported the war in Iraq), the Dems blamed....the Greens again.

* In 2008 the economic crash hand-delivered the White House to them (with most voters forgetting how establishment dems had done just as much as Republicans to set the stage for the crash). Still, they tried everything possible to say Obama was too liberal for the presidency and have their chosen establishment candidate in that space instead. Thankfully Obama had the personal charisma and feel-good story to overcome even the Democratic establishment for once, and won handily anyway on the most liberal message in decades.

* Of course, Obama immediately turns to the Empire and nominates a bunch of Wall Street insiders and retreds to handle economic policy, then lets the bankers off scot-free while the American poor still suffered. Obamacare fails to reform heath care (it only expands it) and is as much a giveaway to industry as it is to the uninsured, which is why even industry ends up backing it. And of course any substantial movement on civil rights or other major liberal priorities is seen as pushing too far because only the economy matters. Does it work? What do the massive congressional losses in 2010 tell you?

* 2016 and eight years of Obama's centrism (more free trade agreements, more foreign wars, more putting off reform until later) has American voters pretty unenthusiastic for Democrats in election year. Bernie Sanders runs a campaign with surprising enthusiasm despite starting late and having the entire establishment against him. Democrats completely shut him down with a mix of dirty moves and general force, put forth yet another centrist instead, then luck out by getting one of the all-time WOAT presidential candidates on the other side. She fumbles the fukk out of the bag in the biggest general election upset of our lifetimes. Who do the Democrats blame? Sanders, of course, despite Sanders wholeheartedly supported Clinton in the general (and despite a higher % of Sanders voters supporting Clinton in the general than Clinton voters had supported Obama in 2008).

* Trump fukks up 2020 so bad that the election should have been a gimme. The economy was fukked. The response to Covid was fukked. The response to Black injustices was fukked. The momentum was ALL for the left. Bernie comes into the primaries and starts crushing the buildings, all the momentum is behind him, he has genuine enthusiasm from independent voters, left-wing voters, 3rd-party voters, young voters, brown voters, working-class rust belt voters - all groups that the Democrats had been losing the trust of recently. Do the Dems double down on that energy? Of course not. Instead, the entire establishment throws its weight behind a guy who had finished 4th in Iowa (half of Bernie's support), 5th in New Hampshire (1/3 of Bernie's support), and a distance 2nd in Nevada (less than 1/2 of Bernie's support). A guy who had sucked ass in multiple previous presidential elections. A guy who had looked like shyt in the debates and who had been making nonsensical diversions and falsehoods in stump speeches. A guy who didn't even have the energy to campaign frequently and who didn't even want to because there was no enthusiast base for him anyway. A guy whose entire record was the polar opposite of the BLM energy sweeping the nation, whose entire persona was the opposite of the movement the young and the left (especially the young left black and brown) were feeling to actually change something in this country. But the establishment wanted him elected, so he got elected. Trump was fukking up the economy, fukking up with Covid, fukking up with BLM, and the vote-by-mail was a godsend for Democratic turnout. It should have been a fukking blowout.....and yet Biden barely squeaks through, badly underperforming compared to polling #'s. After all those advantages the election was basically a tossup - Biden won 4 out of 4 states decided by 1.1% or less, if Trump had won any 3 of them, the presidency would have been his.

Now Biden is having a hell of a time with the American people, in large part due to the same deficiencies that made it so hard for him to win presidential contests in the first place - he speaks poorly, makes lots of errors, brings no enthusiasm, and no one except for moderate establishment dems is convinced he's on their side. Who do the Democrats blame for this predictable turn of events?

They blame....wait for it.....wait for it.....THE LEFT!!!!



Like I said, fukking groundhog day. Except Bill Murray actually tried to improve himself and get better, while these old-ass self-serving establishment democrats never fukking learn.
 

Ethnic Vagina Finder

The Great Paper Chaser
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
55,153
Reputation
2,816
Daps
156,234
Reppin
North Jersey but I miss Cali :sadcam:
:dahell:


This is mind-blowing inaccurate to the point where I'm not even sure you recognize my screenname.

You've never seen me take a strong opinion? You think I'm pro-establishment? You think I didn't expect Ukraine to get blown out? What? :what:


There's a huge thread going on literally right now where all the pro-establishment guys are attacking me for not being pro-establishment and not believing that Ukraine can defeat Putin on the military battlefield. Where I have a massive 6-paragraph post attacking everything the Democratic establishment has done for the last 30 years. If you think that I'm pro-establishment, that I thought Ukraine can win, and that I don't take strong opinions, then you just proved that your don't even read what I post.

If you don’t think the current state of this country started with Obama’s presidency. If you don’t think he turned an opportunity to shape this country into something better, into doing whatever he had to to not be a one term president, which resulted in fukkery ever since, then you’re probably pro establishment.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,691
Daps
203,913
Reppin
the ether
If you don’t think the current state of this country started with Obama’s presidency. If you don’t think he turned an opportunity to shape this country into something better, into doing whatever he had to to not be a one term president, which resulted in fukkery ever since, then you’re probably pro establishment.


Read the last comment I just posted dumbass. :laff:
 

get these nets

Veteran
Joined
Jul 8, 2017
Messages
53,621
Reputation
14,554
Daps
201,668
Reppin
Above the fray.
A lot of you guys just bandwagoning hating on OP. How the fukk is it appropriate for a sitting U.S. senator who voted on some innocuous funding bills writing a memoir? You remember “Memoirs of a Geisha”? That hitch was a Geisha her whole life. He’s trying to be the next narcissist black senator like Obama.

Warnock is the second AA Senator elected in the South. He headed a historic Black church (MLK's church) and he is a first generation college graduate (from Morehouse).

Sounds like a life story that would appeal to different people. And surely serve as inspiration to young Black men.

You can make jokes about Geisha girls though. Hope you get Madame Butterfly'd one day.
 

Broke Wave

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
18,704
Reputation
4,580
Daps
44,589
Reppin
Open Society Foundation
Because when I'm arguing with you I'm arguing with an idiot who posts right-wing talking points. If you had read any of my other posts ever you see that I'm not even a Democrat and I hate the democratic establishment. But I always argue against bullshyt right-wing lies, that doesn't make me pro-establishment.

Napoleon is the most pro-establishment guy here and I've had him on ignore for 3 years because I got sick of arguing with his bullshyt. Pressure and 88m3 are massive pro-establishment guys and they hate my guts. You really need to get out more.





I'm convinced you don't even understand the words that you're using.



This is a typical comment from me from just a few days ago. Everyone who actually reads political posts knows that this is the exact same posting I've done for 7 years (like all the way back in 2015 and 2016 when I defended people who refused to vote for Clinton). If you think is "pro-establishment" or "support the status quo" you're a fukking idiot:
Like I said I’m not reading your gigantic word salad which is the same “the Democratic Party needs to go more left!” Childish nonsense. Nap, 88 and pressure are not pro establishment they are pro imperialism. Unabashedly they support the killing of innocent people around the world and the destruction of nations if someone in Washington says it is for “American interests”. Arguing with a paid shill and two well known WOATs doesn’t give you any credentials.

I don’t even wanna go back and forth with you brother you are intellectually stunted and therefore boring to argue with. I’m looking to clown people who are openly stanning Ukraine. Clowns like @Lord Beasley and @Orbital-Fetus who at least openly took a side in the psy op. A clown like yourself is still looking for the nuanced third way.
 

Broke Wave

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
18,704
Reputation
4,580
Daps
44,589
Reppin
Open Society Foundation
Warnock is the second AA Senator elected in the South. He headed a historic Black church (MLK's church) and he is a first generation college graduate (from Morehouse).

Sounds like a life story that would appeal to different people. And surely serve as inspiration to young Black men.

You can make jokes about Geisha girls though. Hope you get Madame Butterfly'd one day.
So he was the second black senator in the south and the head of a church at one point. Big fukking deal. I don’t think it should be illegal for him to write his stupid little book. I think morons like you can go and read it and be inspired. I’m glad he achieved so much and gained such a high level of power and influence only to do absolutely zero advocacy for the same group he rode to go to the top. You’re lauding his public voting record like he’s made any headlines. He’s going along to get along so he can be the longest serving senator and write another book.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,691
Daps
203,913
Reppin
the ether
Like I said I’m not reading your gigantic word salad

If you really want to look like a clown too immature to participate in serious discussions, then call 6 paragraphs a "gigantic word salad" just because it was too long to fit in a tweet.

Nothing in what I said was a "word salad". I gave a linear account of 30 years of American politics. That's not what "word salad" means.




which is the same “the Democratic Party needs to go more left!” Childish nonsense. Nap, 88 and pressure are not pro establishment they are pro imperialism. Unabashedly they support the killing of innocent people around the world and the destruction of nations if someone in Washington says it is for “American interests”. Arguing with a paid shill and two well known WOATs doesn’t give you any credentials.

So what, you like the Democrats as they are? Or think the Democratic party needs to go more right? And that somehow makes me the pro-establishment guy? :skip:

I've been anti-imperial on all sides since I first posted here. But somehow that doesn't make me anti-establishment.....



I don’t even wanna go back and forth with you brother you are intellectually stunted and therefore boring to argue with. I’m looking to clown people who are openly stanning Ukraine. Clowns like @Lord Beasley and @Orbital-Fetus who at least openly took a side in the psy op. A clown like yourself is still looking for the nuanced third way.

Wait, so you're not pro-Ukraine, and you think going "third way" is a clown position....so what's that leave, pro-Russia? Would you buy Russian oil to fund their imperialist adventures or no?
 

get these nets

Veteran
Joined
Jul 8, 2017
Messages
53,621
Reputation
14,554
Daps
201,668
Reppin
Above the fray.
So he was the second black senator in the south and the head of a church at one point. Big fukking deal. I don’t think it should be illegal for him to write his stupid little book. I think morons like you can go and read it and be inspired. I’m glad he achieved so much and gained such a high level of power and influence only to do absolutely zero advocacy for the same group he rode to go to the top. You’re lauding his public voting record like he’s made any headlines. He’s going along to get along so he can be the longest serving senator and write another book.
You're making jokes and speaking in extremes about comments thst can be verifiable refuted. With the limited leverage and pull he has as a newbie Senator, he has publicly advocated for additional funding for AA farmers and for HBCUs.


Booker Appointed to Senate Agriculture Committee

February 02, 2021
Washington, DC -- US Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ) has been appointed to the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry, one of the oldest Senate committees whose jurisdiction focuses on agriculture, nutrition, food, and hunger.


In addition to Booker, Sen. Raphael Warnock (D-GA) was also appointed to the committee, marking the first time in history two African-Americans will serve simultaneously on the panel. The pair are only the second and third African-Americans to ever serve on the Senate Agriculture Committee in its history.

========================
Full list of the Ag. Committee is here

Committee Membership | The United States Senate Committee On Agriculture, Nutrition & Forestry

Like I said earlier, his activity in the Senate is public record. You HAVE to walk back the "zero advocacy" line. It's YTer babble paid for by Republicans and targeted to audience that needs to be told what to think and what to say.
 

Ethnic Vagina Finder

The Great Paper Chaser
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
55,153
Reputation
2,816
Daps
156,234
Reppin
North Jersey but I miss Cali :sadcam:
Warnock is the second AA Senator elected in the South. He headed a historic Black church (MLK's church) and he is a first generation college graduate (from Morehouse).

Sounds like a life story that would appeal to different people. And surely serve as inspiration to young Black men.

You can make jokes about Geisha girls though. Hope you get Madame Butterfly'd one day.

If this was 1972, or even 1992, I would agree. But in 2022, I’m past being mesmerized by shyt like that.

Lebron James didn’t go to college and he’s a billionaire. White people drop out of college and go on to become successful entrepreneurs. Furthermore, what does his accomplishments and his legacy have to do way black people in 2022. When it’s all said and done, he will have profited and benefited more than anyone else.
 

Ethnic Vagina Finder

The Great Paper Chaser
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
55,153
Reputation
2,816
Daps
156,234
Reppin
North Jersey but I miss Cali :sadcam:
Someone name dropped Corey Booker. The same Cory Booker that leveraged being mayor of Newark, NJ (in which he accomplished very little) into a vacated senate seat. The same Cory Booker that…..




Then turn around and…




Nothing but political speak
 

acri1

The Chosen 1
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
24,286
Reputation
3,818
Daps
106,728
Reppin
Detroit
Someone name dropped Corey Booker. The same Cory Booker that leveraged being mayor of Newark, NJ (in which he accomplished very little) into a vacated senate seat. The same Cory Booker that…..




Then turn around and…




Nothing but political speak


So basically you just hate any black person that goes into poltiics :skip:
 

get these nets

Veteran
Joined
Jul 8, 2017
Messages
53,621
Reputation
14,554
Daps
201,668
Reppin
Above the fray.
If this was 1972, or even 1992, I would agree. But in 2022, I’m past being mesmerized by shyt like that.

Lebron James didn’t go to college and he’s a billionaire. White people drop out of college and go on to become successful entrepreneurs. Furthermore, what does his accomplishments and his legacy have to do way black people in 2022. When it’s all said and done, he will have profited and benefited more than anyone else.
1) You don't have to be mesmerized, but his parents instilled strong values and work ethic in him to have achieved those things. People with similar values can identify with his story, others may not.

2)The same LeBron James who built a public high school for the other 99.99% of the children in Akron who won't become professional athletes so that they are prepared for the training,education,career options that are available to them?
That LeBron?
Just say openly that you don't value formal education.

3) You continue to make things up as you go along. First criticizing him for having done nothing yet. Now saying that when it's all said and done, Black people will not have benefited from him being in office.
 
Top