To me, I skimmed this and came to the conclusion that the only thing he is guilty of is being thirsty and making shyt awkward.
Even the article didn't have a tone of urgency or danger.
This doesn't even seem like coercion or blk mail. He's got issues with being too eager, but she got issues saying no which really needs to be addressed in these conversations, but isn't sexual assault. To be honest, she comes off just as awkward as he does.
It was cringeworthy to read this. Was there anywhere there was a clear no and he didn't back off? Did I miss a part?
Trust me when I say nothing is greater than the elite being called out on their bullshyt and this Hollywood witch hunt has been entertaining, but only if they actually doing something wrong. Especially b/c there are legitimate cases of assault that will be dismissed when the waters are muddied by sexually ambivalent chicks who just have postclit clarity.
Lemme read this again to see if I'm missing something.