From the 1490s when Christopher Columbus set foot on the Americas to the 1890 massacre of Sioux at Wounded Knee by the United States military, the indigenous population of the Western Hemisphere may have declined, the direct cause mostly from disease, to 1.8 million, from as many as 100 million.
What did people really think this was just happening in Africa?
If you were raised in America, and went to public schools, you pretty much only learn about Slavery in terms of American genocide, and even that is extremely diluted and whitewashed.
You know more about the Holocaust than anything else. They skim through the Trail of Tears for maybe 2 minutes.
In Brazil, they don't say shyt.
well the main difference, is that in the americas, the conquistadores and other colonists are still there and they still control everything, the majority of latin america is white or majoity white ancestry
the europeans actually wanted to colonize africa the same way they colonized the americas, as in it wasnt just about resources, they wanted to be the majority of the population
in GGS they explain how diseases and the environment stopped european expansion into africa
Brian O'Palmer said:I think the difference is that #1 the americas were a new discovery/world where as Africa had already established itself with civilizations like Egypt who were a huge superpower in the ancient world.