Right, you posted an opinion piece from Jeff Sessions. Of course he's going to attempt to justify himself. *His* words don't hold any weight here.
Wrt your 3rd point, it is misleading:
The Real Story of Jeff Sessions's Role in Prosecuting the Klan - The Atlantic
What Jeff Sessions's Role in Prosecuting the Klan Reveals About His Civil-Rights Record
Defenders of Trump’s choice for attorney general have cited an Alabama lynching case as evidence of his commitment to racial equality. The real story is more complicated.
Sessions doesn't get credit for not obstructing the case.
In 1986, Figures testified before the Senate that while it was “literally true” that Sessions had not “obstructed the investigation of the murder of Michael Donald,” Sessions had “tried to persuade me to discontinue pursuit of the case.” Figures said that Sessions “remarked, with regard to the investigation, that the case was a waste of time, that it wasn’t going anywhere, that I should spend more time on other things, and that, if the perpetrators were found, I would not be assigned to the case.” Figures told the Senate that after the case went to the grand jury, and it “became increasingly apparent that we were going to break the case, Mr. Sessions attitude changed” and that he supported the prosecution.
Coretta Scott King's 1986 statement and testimony on Jeff...
Sessions also used his office to intimidate black voters and to turn a blind eye to racist judges. But you're giving him the benefit of the doubt, you were all for his ratcheting up the war on drugs. You were happy to see what little in the way of sentencing reform be done away with.
I'm not defending or damage controlling shyt. I just don't like you as a person. You're a snake. You're always in these threads hammering away at something (from encouraging people not to vote or spreading nonsensical conspiracy theories) and attempting to sow discord.
It's also funny how you don't realize you're doing exactly the same thing you're mad at Obama for, but for Jeff Sessions.