The Way They Killed The Villain In Thor 2 Was Trash: Yes Spoiler
- Thread starter Mr. Somebody
- Start date
Mr. Somebody
Friend Of A Friend
More then 1 out of every 2 movie critics enjoy the film. Thats saying a lot since movie criticis try so hard to hate, friend.56% on rottentomatoes says other wise.
Its odd how man of steel is better then thor 1 and 2 but man of steel gets more hate.
Saysumthinfunnymike
VOTE!!!
56% on rottentomatoes says other wise.
Nobody cares what a bunch of entitled and pretentious cacs think about films based on source material that they don't know dikk about. Man of Steel had mostly positive reviews from overseas, it didn't drop below "Fresh" until it hit here in the U.S. because our reviewers are miserable fukking lames.
Thor 2 was what I've come to expect from the MCU outside of Winter Soldier which was very well done.. Most of their films have generic plots with weak villains and there's no real threat or urgency.. there's no weight to the story because the villains are usually a joke and nobody of importance is in danger of dying..
55% on metacritic as well
and nerds still fighting over it a year later on its IMDB message board
I don't co-sign any @Mr. Somebody thread in which he doesn't say friend in the first post, friend.
I agree with you though.
I agree with you though.
Ed MOTHEREFFING G
Chances make champions
that film was pretty trash...i'm still curious why anyone gave a fukk about the ether...its REAL tesseract-y
Mr. Somebody
Friend Of A Friend
I think the demonic elf was a sore loser. Basically because the elves lost a war to the asgardians he wanted to destroy the universe and start over again.
Its so demonic, friends.
Those ships they were using were pretty cool though.
Ive never seen so many pillars get knocked down and not weaken a structure.
what kinda logic is this?every movie you ever wanted to see you managed to within 8-9 months of it's release?
every movie you ever wanted to see you managed to within 8-9 months of it's release?
obviously, and if i didn't i certainly wouldn't be mad if someone posted a spoiler many months later
so you've never taken longer than 9 months to see a movie you liked?
damn breh I didn't know there was rules to this created by you out here. i gotta family, still haven't even made it outta season one of game of thrones.
But lemme guess it's cool for someone to tell me everything that's going on cause I shoulda been watching it already right ???
have you seen old boy?
so you've never taken longer than 9 months to see a movie you liked?
damn breh I didn't know there was rules to this created by you out here. i gotta family, still haven't even made it outta season one of game of thrones.
But lemme guess it's cool for someone to tell me everything that's going on cause I shoulda been watching it already right ???
have you seen old boy?
That's a tv show right (game of thrones) i never seen that.
And i heard of old boy but never seen it. Usually the movies i wanna see i see right away. And if it's something i never seen and i just heard of i can't be wait if someone spoiled the movie you know. I say if something just came out (Spiderman 2) then give it a month or 2 before you start spoiling the movie IMO.
That should be plenty of time to go and see it.
so you got no problem with me telling you the twist to Old Boy right now?
absolutely not, i'll probably never see it and if i did i wouldn't remember what you said anyway lol.
Mr. Somebody
Friend Of A Friend
Thats the sign of a good film as far as im concerned. People didnt fight over Superman Returns, because it was poop, friend.55% on metacritic as well
and nerds still fighting over it a year later on its IMDB message board
