The theory of evolution. Fact or fiction?

[Lexington Steele]

Yes, evolution has been proven.

No, your Young Earth Creationist argument is not new, has been debunked for many years, and is frankly at this point, boring.

Evolution's real, God isn't, nothing happens when you die, you will never see your loved ones again, those a$$holes you hated are not burning in hell, there is no purpose to life.

It sucks but that's the deal.

Try to enjoy p*ssy or music or whatever you like until it's over. Which it will be soon.

 

[Complexion]

You know what the difference is between monkeys and humans?

Spoiler

Monkeys are naturally intelligent, freely expressive and totally coherent:






What I was actually looking for was an old documentary in which a baby chimp falls from the tree as it was capering and its mother grabs him up, yells at the siblings and they all run off into the jungle and come back with a leaf, some bark and berries. The mother starts chewing the bark and squishes the berries into a pack which is then slapped on the kid via the leaf and held in place with the compression of her body.

Two days later the young thundercat was swinging through the trees again and the documentary team stands there with the Wee-bey face. They picked specimens and sent them off for a test. Turned out the bark was analgesic and numbed the pain whilst the berries were anti inflammatory and pro circulation. Just what was needed for healing.

Let that sink in because I'm pretty sure none of those chimps had PhDs, peer reviewed studies or pharmacists to break em off a little something something but they certainly are better in tune with the unfinite. If you ever find the clip please let me know, I think it was a BBC documentary from the 90s to 00s.

 

[MMS]

Yes, evolution has been proven.

No, your Young Earth Creationist argument is not new, has been debunked for many years, and is frankly at this point, boring.

Evolution's real, God isn't, nothing happens when you die, you will never see your loved ones again, those a$$holes you hated are not burning in hell, there is no purpose to life.

It sucks but that's the deal.

Try to enjoy p*ssy or music or whatever you like until it's over. Which it will be soon.

more childish statements and projections of what you're afraid of. God is a God of love. Not torment. Noone is even arguing for "young earth" either. But thats the political stance you take because you skim read. Another sign of lack of thorough reading on both the idea you wish to attack and the idea you supposedly know is rock solid (pun intended because them rocks cant be dated either)

Some of y'all in here on some "I feel..." "I think..." type shyt with nothing to back up yalls claims. And when presented with evidence not from some rabbit hole YouTube channel y'all get mad and confused and double down on yalls unbacked claims

what evidence? you do realize there is zero evidence of acquired beneficial traits (mutation)

do yall realize how indoctrinated you sound when you say "its been proven" when the only proof you have is your HS text books and google searches of other people saying its proven?

that isnt proof, its just other indoctrinated people

 

[MMS]

What I was actually looking for was an old documentary in which a baby chimp falls from the tree as it was capering and its mother grabs him up, yells at the siblings and they all run off into the jungle and come back with a leaf, some bark and berries. The mother starts chewing the bark and squishes the berries into a pack which is then slapped on the kid via the leaf and held in place with the compression of her body.

Two days later the young thundercat was swinging through the trees again and the documentary team stands there with the Wee-bey face. They picked specimens and sent them off for a test. Turned out the bark was analgesic and numbed the pain whilst the berries were anti inflammatory and pro circulation. Just what was needed for healing.

Let that sink in because I'm pretty sure none of those chimps had PhDs, peer reviewed studies or pharmacists to break em off a little something something but they certainly are better in tune with the unfinite. If you ever find the clip please let me know, I think it was a BBC documentary from the 90s to 00s.

what is this supposed to even mean?

i think it was @Ghost Utmost that said this (or along these lines) but the whole "spoken" world is at the expense of other worlds that you "could" sense

so the monkey might know languages you just arent perceiving in the smell/taste world.

monkeys also form packs and brutally kill other monkeys from other tribes and cannibalize them.

 

[Complexion]

what is this supposed to even mean?

Now we both know you're trolling its so much more fun to read your content. Have you ever wondered why they call the nutty "insane"? Surely they should be "outsane", yes? Isn't that so much more accurate? There is a reason I call these spells Devilish because they are which is why the Natives said "White man speaks with forked tongue", innerstand?

If you are infinite, by this logic, you are inside the finite (aka this dimension) whereas what I'm speaking of is transcendent, beyond yet equally present. Constant, unchanging. The unfinite suits best the experience of which I'm speaking and that is what all animals (expect humans, seemingly) have natural resonance with. Its why they jet before earthquakes and tsunamis as they may not speak but the innerstand when the unfinite does. Can you hear the Psylense?

There is a reason why most peeps think "awful" is bad when it once meant something else, as one would expect, because being full of awe really is something.

Words are weapons and thoughts are things.

 

[MMS]

Now we both know you're trolling its so much more fun to read your content. Have you ever wondered why they call the nutty "insane"? Surely they should be "outsane", yes? Isn't that so much more accurate? There is a reason I call these spells Devilish because they are which is why the Natives said "White man speaks with forked tongue", innerstand?

If you are infinite, by this logic, you are inside the finite (aka this dimension) whereas what I'm speaking of is transcendent, beyond yet equally present. Constant, unchanging. The unfinite suits best the experience of which I'm speaking and that is what all animals (expect humans, seemingly) have natural resonance with. Its why they jet before earthquakes and tsunamis as they may not speak but the innerstand when the unfinite does. Can you hear the Psylense?

There is a reason why most peeps think "awful" is bad when it once meant something else, as one would expect, because being full of awe really is something.

Words are weapons and thoughts are things.

surely

but to me words are healing, and thoughts are realities

why do you think the symbol "Ankh" is always in the hands of the egyptian "deities" handing them to egyptians?

Holy Bolt

Holy Bolt is a Paladin Skill in Diablo II. The Paladin can learn to summon bolts formed of pure, righteous energies. These projectiles are vessels of life, bane to the undead, and succor to the faithful. At the battle of Taelohn Bridge, the villagers feared the day was lost when an army of the...

diablo.fandom.com

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

what evidence? you do realize there is zero evidence of acquired beneficial traits (mutation)

Actually.....

Acquired traits can be inherited via small RNAs

Researchers have found the first direct evidence that an acquired trait can be inherited without any DNA involvement. The findings suggest that Lamarck, whose theory of evolution was eclipsed by Darwin's, may not have been entirely wrong.

www.sciencedaily.com

https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(11)01341-9?_returnURL=https%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS0092867411013419%3Fshowall%3Dtrue

 

[MMS]

Actually.....

Acquired traits can be inherited via small RNAs

Researchers have found the first direct evidence that an acquired trait can be inherited without any DNA involvement. The findings suggest that Lamarck, whose theory of evolution was eclipsed by Darwin's, may not have been entirely wrong.

www.sciencedaily.com

https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(11)01341-9?_returnURL=https%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS0092867411013419%3Fshowall%3Dtrue

from the Abstract

In an early theory of evolution, Jean Baptiste Larmarck (1744-1829) proposed that species evolve when individuals adapt to their environment and transmit those acquired traits to their offspring. For example, giraffes developed elongated long necks as they stretched to feed on the leaves of high trees, an acquired advantage that was inherited by subsequent generations. In contrast, Charles Darwin (1809-1882) later theorized that random mutations that offer an organism a competitive advantage drive a species' evolution. In the case of the giraffe, individuals that happened to have slightly longer necks had a better chance of securing food and thus were able to have more offspring. The subsequent discovery of hereditary genetics supported Darwin's theory, and Lamarck's ideas faded into obscurity.

so note, the assumptions of Lamarck and Darwin were

• that different length necked Giraffes must have existed
• the giraffe we see today are the only ones who survived
• long necks were acquired through breeding

now back to the papers investigation of "Round worms"

immunity to certain viruses is a mechanism that is independent of the actual viruses in question. Meaning the same mechanism is often used for new immunities albeit different proteins

can you really say this is a "novel" mutation? meaning that no such mechanism existed before this type of roundworm developed it?

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

can you really say this is a "novel" mutation? meaning that no such mechanism existed before this type of roundworm developed it?

Nope, but that isn't the issue you raised.​

 

[MMS]

Nope, but that isn't the issue you raised.​

the issue I raised is "acquired beneficial trait"

so you're saying that had I said: "acquired beneficial feature" then that is somehow different?

first off, one of the biggest things in evolution is the idea that we start small/less complex, and then creatures gained traits/functions/features over time

meaning: a bacterium must have become a eukaryote, and a eukaryote must have become a slime mold, and a slime mold must have eventually turned into water bugs etc

this type of change has never been observed but is theorized and is the backbone of evolution.

To me, this is where the big lie is. We can agree to disagree if what I said doesn't make sense.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

the issue I raised is "acquired beneficial trait"

so you're saying that had I said: "acquired beneficial feature" then that is somehow different?

No, and what you might have said is of no consequence.​

 

[Still Benefited]

Yes, evolution has been proven.

No, your Young Earth Creationist argument is not new, has been debunked for many years, and is frankly at this point, boring.

Evolution's real, God isn't, nothing happens when you die, you will never see your loved ones again, those a$$holes you hated are not burning in hell, there is no purpose to life.

It sucks but that's the deal.

Try to enjoy p*ssy or music or whatever you like until it's over. Which it will be soon.

Its easy to make up science "facts" ,when you dont feel embarrassed standing on baseless assumptions.

Well I assume I will be reincarnated immediately after I die. In a world just as "real" as this one where everyone flies like Superman. And the earth is incredibally flat. My assumption that you cant disprove just completely made your "laws",and evolution theory false and irrelevant

 

[Uitomy]

Yes, evolution has been proven.

No, your Young Earth Creationist argument is not new, has been debunked for many years, and is frankly at this point, boring.

Evolution's real, God isn't, nothing happens when you die, you will never see your loved ones again, those a$$holes you hated are not burning in hell, there is no purpose to life.

It sucks but that's the deal.

Try to enjoy p*ssy or music or whatever you like until it's over. Which it will be soon.

So, why is life even a thing? What started evolution?

 

[Tasha And]

So, why is life even a thing? What started evolution?

There is no scientific theory for abiogenesis yet, just competing hypothesis’s.

 

[Lexington Steele]

Its easy to make up science "facts" ,when you dont feel embarrassed standing on baseless assumptions.

It's "easy" to put "quotation marks" around words to "make" it "seem" like you're actually making a "point."